sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2006-01-11 05:09 pm

The Language Fascist strikes again!

I just came across the term "material solidarity" in an (otherwise well-intentioned) e-mail. What they meant, I think, was "aid."

Is anyone else getting sick of the way corporatespeak, or at least the structures of corporatespeak -- euphemism, jargon, etc. -- has infiltrated activist vocabulary? All of a sudden, I'm hearing about "point-people" and "bottom-lining." (One friend remarked: "You [the Wobblies] still use 'secretary'? Why?" Because it's the most accurate description of the task. Why else?)

It actually irritates me more than "wimmin" and "persyn," fundamentally misguided though those may be. Corporatespeak is pernicious in any context because it robs the language of meaning. In the realms of business and government, this is done for very specific reasons -- to shift accountability and to obscure information. ("The functionality of the copy machine has been compromised by our Associate Coffee/Errand Assistant I." vs. "The intern broke the copier.")

So what does it mean when we do it?

I'm out of here for the night. Politicos and language geeks -- discuss.

[identity profile] see-my-glock.livejournal.com 2006-01-12 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
Words are subjective if only due to the nature of human condition. As one learns to use language one must build upon a current understanding of thought and form. Because these building blocks differ based on any number of contributing factors, ones understanding of the meaning of words must and will be highly subjective.

However to use language with the expectation that other people will understand exactly the same way you do is foolish at best [for all but the most skilled linguists].

[identity profile] teapolitik.livejournal.com 2006-01-12 10:23 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. All of what you said is true. But it isn't really the phenomenon I'm describing. Subjectivity exists, of course. But abusing or scapegoating subjectivity to avoid being caught in an error is not an honest or effective way to communicate.

[identity profile] see-my-glock.livejournal.com 2006-01-12 01:56 pm (UTC)(link)
okay, i see what youre getting at. please excuse my error in comprehension, i was quite exhausted last night and have the flu.