sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2007-03-03 06:52 pm

Don't click these links

Remember how I said that I didn't think anyone would post the story about a kid dying because he didn't have dental coverage to [livejournal.com profile] conservatism or [livejournal.com profile] libertarianism? I called it wrong. It's now been posted to both.

I was right that the response would be scary.




"While this ultimately wasn't the reason the boy died, I couldn't help but notice there wasn't even one mention of the father being anywhere in the picture.

So, basically, assuming the article didn't fail to mention the dad for whatever reason, this woman had two kids on an obviously low income, and the father is nowhere to be found.

Poor life choices started this journey. The bureaucracy finished it." – The appropriately named [livejournal.com profile] theblackoil.


"If America's "expensive" healthcare goes away, the quality will go with it." - [livejournal.com profile] fishsupreme, whose daddy is a dentist.


"I also would like to add that the whole thing is stupid. These kids were on insurance and she couldn't pay an extra eighty bucks? What?" - [livejournal.com profile] ghoststrider, who has apparently never met a poor person.


"Maybe it's not the GOVERNMENT'S fault, but maybe its the dentist's fault for not seeing a patient in need or working out a payment plan. Then again, who's ultimately responsible for their children's welfare? The feds? The state? or his own mother and father?"

" Plus as mentioned in another thread, this sounds like child abuse and so it should have been reported and the mother should be in jail for this." – [livejournal.com profile] ilovethecure, predictably.


"in a free economy, such things as deamonte's death wouldn't happen. there'd be an incomprehensible amount of medical progress - and abundance. one of the death blows to the fear and hatred of capitalism is that the impulse to charity is biologically present. (hard-core economistic-interpretation types, who'd claim charitable donations are purely about tax-lessening, are unable to explain the huge charity projects of the 19th century, pre-income-tax.)" - [livejournal.com profile] birkin, who claims that his wife died of cancer when they were poor because they couldn't afford a better doctor. Clearly, he lost his mind after that experience.


"If I'm in debt and can find a way to get $1200 for an emergency plane ticket for my grandmothers funeral I think that a mother can scrounge up $80 for obviously needed dentist work for her son." – [livejournal.com profile] strbjun, who is internet-poor.


"Their fault." – [livejournal.com profile] macchaos.


"I've worked with the homeless before so I know that it's exceptionally rare that the homeless have any money whatsoever.

I will say this-if it is a fact that the mother has a mental illness, I will no longer blame her."

"Oh. Well, yeah, I think the primary responsibility falls upon the mother, though I am angry no one intervened in this child's life in time when so many people could have. It's a disgrace.

If if it makes any difference, I'm upper middle class." – [livejournal.com profile] uberarcanist. El oh el.


"this just further proves what i've been saying for years: poor people eat too much candy." – [livejournal.com profile] xdavinx. The level of absurdity in the thread was so high by this point that I can't tell if this cat is joking.


"I bet that mom thinks twice about skipping an $80 dental procedure.

I wonder how much junk food/alcohol/cigarettes that bought. Helpful hint: more toothpaste, less sugary snacks." [livejournal.com profile] reality_hammer. Not joking.



These people should all be cut off from the society that they, in their Randroid-Thatcherite-Reaganite 20-something-upper-middle-class sheltered existences, do not believe exists or affects them in any way, and be left to starve in the wilderness, if any remains after their ideological overlords have burned and pillaged every inch of our world. Beyond that, the only thing I can say is
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
[livejournal.com profile] brownfist and I went to Seekers yesterday. He looked at serious books and I giggled over the backs of Ayn Rand books. That's why he's an academic and I'm not.

Besides that, I mostly wrote and painted today and was kind of productive. My head is going all weird, so I have bursts of inspiration in between long stretches of apathy. YAY.

[identity profile] jhfurnish.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
Republicans are generally people who never experience the lives of the majority of people. If they do start out poor, and become rich, they generally have nothing but contempt for those who do not become rich.

[identity profile] eyelidlessness.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I mean, a huge portion of the Republican support base is the rural poor.

Then again, their options are pretty limited. They can either vote against their own self-interest in Republicans, vote against their own self-interest in Democrats, vote for someone who won't win, or not vote. While the urban poor at least get some lip service, the rural poor simply don't exist in American politics.

[identity profile] smhwpf.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
OK, so these guys obviously got missed when they were handing out... souls. Or something.

Dental is one thing that isn't free on the NHS - although it is for children and those on means-tested benefits, so that is still something that couldn't happen over here. Nor, I guess in Canada?

[identity profile] seaya.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
It could, if they sent the papers for means testing to the wrong place, as has happened in this very case.

[identity profile] lokilokust.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
i'd like to hold down each and every one of those people, take their teeth and eat them while they it there bubbling blood at me.
barring that, i'd like watch each and every one of them die from their inevitable cancer.

[identity profile] threeliesforone.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
i'm totally going to vomit.
ironed_orchid: (opinions suck)

[personal profile] ironed_orchid 2007-03-04 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
oh my fucking god

I mean, I know these people are morally bereft, but it's still shocking to see people exhibit such a clear lack of understanding of what it is to be poor.

Here, if you earn less than a certain amount a week (it was $305 a few years ago), you are entitled to free health care, and subsidized pharmaceuticals and dental care. You still have to pay for most dental visits, but at a greatly reduced cost. Dental health care is provided to children attending state schools, and is usually provided during school hours.

But of course, that requires government spending on both health and education.

The Kantian Nihilists would never have let that kid die.

[identity profile] princessrugger.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
i clicked on the cut-tag (like an idiot), but i'm not looking at the links. because i've been in a really hate-The-Man mood lately, and that will seriously put me over the edge. just for today, i will not commit homicide.

[identity profile] terry-terrible.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
Haven't someone told these people that blaming the victim makes the baby jesus cry?

[identity profile] aaronfreed.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
That does it, I'm adding "Kantian nihilism" to my interests list. Everyone else should do likewise.

I'm actually surprised at how many people on my friends list Don't Get It either. It makes me a sad panda.

[identity profile] elgordochico.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
I'll add it too. Kantian nihilism totally owns Ayn Rand.

[identity profile] seaya.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
I don't even know what it is. I mean, Kantian morality is like do what would be right for any situation. It's quite universalist. It isn't really nihilist.

[identity profile] elgordochico.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
Others know a lot more about Kant than I do, but the fact that tried to reconcile an epistemological, subjective approach to truth (e.g. beauty is in the eye of the beholder, for instance, is a subjective definition) with universalistic ideas made him a really hateful figure to Ayn Rand, who herself held subjective ideas of her own, but, she claimed, a subjective approach to truth, in fact, leads to individualistic conclusions, not to universalistic conclusions as Kant had claimed.

Therefore, it's okay to hate on Kant because he is so dumb that he doesn't see that irretutable logic. Oh, wait, I think what she actually says is Kant is intellectually dishonest, which is a short way of saying he is in the pocket of the Church. Blahblah.

[identity profile] elgordochico.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
...the ironic part is that "morality" of Ayn Rand was a freedom from morality. She didn't believe in universal morals. So, it has always struck me as ironic that she managed to attach "nihilism" to Kantian morality. It's like Ann Coulter calling Hillary "a shrill, opportunistic pseudo-intellectual cunt." Says more about the speaker than the thing under discussion.

[identity profile] misfratz.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought Rand was also against subjectivism, though? I mean, she certainly wasn't an amoralist in the manner of Nietzsche, more of a kind of 'might-makes-right' 'alternative' moralist, who asserted different 'objective' values that were still moralistic. Not that I think she had any kind of coherent philosophical position (and she's certainly not considered a philosopher by any rigourous definition), but she was not in any way against universal value imposition.

[identity profile] elgordochico.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 05:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Hm. I think you're right about her position towards subjectivism. I was writing from memory, but her universal principles, even her objectivism, always struck me as a bit self-contradictory. Fist of all, she believed in the will to power as ultimately the only legitimate motivation for human action. She also believed that this motivation had been perverted by a parasitical idea called "altruism," which was first introduced by Christianity, and later adopted by Communism. So far that's strictly Nietzchean. And then didn't she claim pure egoism would lead to a moral society because everyone was free to do what they liked? Leaving aside the madness of such an assertion, isn't it an opposite of a universal value imposition?

[identity profile] aaronfreed.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
yeah, that's why I like the phrase "Kantian nihilism" so much. It makes no sense.

[identity profile] seaya.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
Heh. I think this discussion has convinced me. I added it!

[identity profile] uberbitsch.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Heh. Our NHS dental service is so headed down that route.

[identity profile] pluvka.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
i took a look at those threads yesterday and saw someone actually claim that they didn't believe any dentist would really turn away a child in need and that the mother must have lied about it.

i also saw someone say that it was the mother's fault for putting the other son's needs first (the one with SIX CAVITIES).

[identity profile] elgordochico.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
"Ayn Rand alone stood firm against the tide of Kantian nihilism and in support of reason, individualism, and laissez-faire capitalism."

It's funny because it's true.

[identity profile] chailash.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
this country makes me sad.

[identity profile] 99catsaway.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
Jesus Christ.

[personal profile] fannishnonsense 2007-03-04 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
God, I wish I hadn't clicked those links.

I don't have dental insurance myself, and I recently had to pay $95 out of pocket to my dentist. Plus I have to go back- a few years without insurance has led to 4 fairly serious cavities. But apparently this is my own fault for making "poor life choices" or whatever those assholes call them. Because I chose to be working class apparently.

[identity profile] king-felix.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
Any person who acts in this world in such a way as to alter the course of life for many, has to assume that they have the knowledge, clarity, and moral authority to enact, at times against popular wishes, what is believed to be best for everyone.

This has been something that's bothered me for a long time, because approaching anything from this position constricts people's autonomy and will invariably lead to some form of abuse. And yet the fact remains that no form of governance can exist without this constriction. The choices seem to be that the few tyrannize the many, or the many tyrannize the few -- either way a lot of people will likely be cheated. This is part of the reason I waver in my wish for some sort of revolution...

But getting to the point: What I've learned from history and culture is that none of the above considerations matter. Our enemies should be shown no respect, and in fact should be robbed of personhood. This is why I would consider placing every conservative fucknut (starting with the pundits, of course) in a zoo, caged until they die, so that people (who are meant to learn from the conservative suffering) have a place to go with their families where they can toss food*, jeer, and generally feel good about their situation in contrast with the poor fucks who have been robbed of their freedom, and their strength through their "belief" in absolute self-governance.

I’d have a coliseum built where we would place spin-doctors and advisors to battle it out with African lions.

And thirdly, I’d build giant pens where marketers are artificially fattened, and then forced to eat McDonald’s for every meal of the day for the rest of their short, natural lives.

*This is the only way they’ll be fed, through both the charity and condescension of others.


I don’t actually know how any of this is related, but there you have it. I work long hours, I get crazy.

I knew I shouldn't...

[identity profile] theoldanarchist.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 05:41 am (UTC)(link)

but I couldn't help it. I read that garbage, and got just what I expected: blame the victim, blame the mom, blame the bureaucrats; but never never blame the market. Blah blah blah. These people are not libertarians---their views have nothing whatever to do with liberty. When did libertarianism become not-giving-a-shit-about-anybody? Talk about nihilism...

[identity profile] aaronfreed.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 06:23 am (UTC)(link)
More on Kantian Nihilism

Actually, a shitload of stuff turns up when you google. It's good stuff.

[identity profile] roter-terror.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 08:34 am (UTC)(link)
Birkin's comment... well, that's a piece of work.

All of those people need to have holes drilled into their teeth, and then the holes should be packed full of shit and smarties.

[identity profile] nom-de-grr.livejournal.com 2007-03-04 05:18 pm (UTC)(link)
[livejournal.com profile] ilovethecure makes baby Robert Smith cry.

Off Topic

[identity profile] rohmie.livejournal.com 2007-03-05 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
Cuttlefish are cute, if not cuddly.

Actually *On* Topic

[identity profile] rohmie.livejournal.com 2007-03-05 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
My friend, [livejournal.com profile] jamie_miller, made this parody on the matter which has gotten picked up by Salon.

Back Off Topic

[identity profile] rohmie.livejournal.com 2007-03-05 05:47 am (UTC)(link)
You have to admit it's true.

[identity profile] lemur-man.livejournal.com 2007-03-05 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)
If Randroids are all so individualist and anti-collectivist, why do they join Objectivist clubs in university and stage protests (in groups!) against things like volunteerism?

Isn't Objectivism just adolescent I-don't-wanna-mow-the-lawn petulance disguised as a political philosophy?

[identity profile] lopukhov.livejournal.com 2007-03-06 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
I'm kinda at a loss of intelligent words right now. Because I'm juvenile, I'm resorting to attacks ad hominem. Cons and Libs do it all the time anyway, so I guess it doesn't matter: [livejournal.com profile] ilovethecure's concubine has drag queen eyes.

I think Robert Smith would have shaken his goff hair at him.