sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2009-12-01 05:48 pm

Even evil has standards

Wow, check it out! Former "center-left" cyclist turned warmongering fascist Charles Johnson has turned again. Colour me skeptical (like someone pointed out on [livejournal.com profile] fengi's LJ, it'll take one more terrorist attack to turn him back, but it's almost heartening to read.

I wonder if he'll apologize for his blog being a gathering place for genocidal maniacs for the last eight years.

If he's serious, though: Welcome back to the reality-based community.

[identity profile] pope-guilty.livejournal.com 2009-12-03 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Those smaller social structures- structures based around cooperation and free association- are what anarchism is, not some inane Mad Max fantasy.

Definitely read some Kropotkin and Bookchin- defining anarchism by anarchists' words instead of by their enemies' is kind of important.

[identity profile] pofflewomp.livejournal.com 2009-12-03 10:57 am (UTC)(link)
That's what I was saying - I thought smaller communities were necessary, but now I've been told (see above) that Bookchin says not necessarily so. I have read Kropotkin but not Bookchin, and I don't know any enemies of anarchism who actually know what it is! What I was wondering was how an anarchist community could work on a large scale, with huge populations in huge cities. I can't imagine it, I think because I see human nature as not that naturally cooperative, or perhaps not since it has developed in huge cities under capitalism - people might need readjustment and re educating, and it might be a lengthy process and they might not want it!