Entry tags:
Today's discussion questions
It's another one of those long days at school and I won't be around, so here are two discussion questions for you. Fight talk amongst yourselves.
1. What do we think of this news story? There's a lot in there, so let's pick it to pieces.
2. Speaking of genocide, the Toronto District School Board has a new history course dealing with the subject. It officially recognizes three genocides: Armenia, the Holocaust, and Rwanda. What's missing, and why do you think they chose to exclude the genocide that happened in the country where the course will be taught.
Have a happy Friday!
1. What do we think of this news story? There's a lot in there, so let's pick it to pieces.
2. Speaking of genocide, the Toronto District School Board has a new history course dealing with the subject. It officially recognizes three genocides: Armenia, the Holocaust, and Rwanda. What's missing, and why do you think they chose to exclude the genocide that happened in the country where the course will be taught.
Have a happy Friday!
no subject
The book quotes extensively from numerous IBM and government memos and letters that describe how IBM in New York, IBM's Geneva office and Dehomag, its German subsidiary, were intimately involved in supporting Nazi oppression. The book also includes IBM's internal reports that admit that these machines made the Nazis much more efficient in their efforts. Several C-SPAN broadcasts and a 2003 documentary film "The Corporation" showed close-ups of several documents including IBM code sheets for concentration camps taken from the files of the National Archives. Prisoner Code 8 was Jew, Code 11 was Gypsy. Camp Code 001 was Auschwitz, Code 002 was Buchenwald. Status Code 5 was executed by order, code 6 was gas chamber."
What about this? I don't know *anything* about foreign business policy but shouldn't IBM's involvement have been taken seriously? PRETTY EFFED UP IMO.
no subject
I'm no fan of IBM. I usedf to work for them and hated it. But let's look at a modern parallel. Let's say Microsoft sold SQL Server to the government of Israel which then used that software to track Palestinians it wanted to rub out would you really say that Microsoft was responsible?
no subject
That's everyone's excuse for their involvement in the Holocaust! Okay though.
that is . . .
no subject
But it's true. I mean you wouldn't blame a German chemical company for the bombing of Dresden because their pre-war US subsidiary made explosives for the US Air Force. Or would you?
no subject