sabotabby: two lisa frank style kittens with a zizek quote (trash can of ideology)
I've finished watching it (I know, I know, I missed the Discourse). Conspirituality recently did an episode about it (two, actually, as it was mentioned at length in the preceding episode. They thought it was well done but ultimately fell into a conservative framework while distorting basic truths and fanning a moral panic, and I've seen that sentiment elsewhere online. However. I disagree to the point where I wonder if they watched the same show I just did.

The spoiler-free version: I thought it was stunning acting. The continuous shot thing can be a gimmick (and I think it can be problematic in a way slightly orthogonal but not unrelated to Conspirituality's critique) but it made for compelling TV. It is very obviously a fictional show that plays some elements up for dramatic effect, but it captures some fundamental truths about the kids today and I think it's worthwhile. I do not think it should be the basis of policy for the UK government or anywhere else; I do think it's important viewing for people who work with kids or have kids in their lives.

I have to get more spoilery if I want to discuss the critiques. )
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
It was recently Remembrance Day here in so-called Canada, and schools across the country must grapple with some inherent contradictions. Remembrance Day may have started as a whole anti-war, never again sort of vibe commemoration but as the bloody fist emerged from the velvet glove, it became a celebration of war and militarism. Canadian values, as seen in the foolhardy invasion of Afghanistan to replace the Taliban with *checks notes* the Taliban, or the brutal torture and murder of a Somali teenager, the continuous violence enacted on Indigenous peoples, or the overthrowing of a democratically elected government in Haiti, are reframed as a valiant, noble fight for peace, freedom, and security. Generations of schoolchildren must memorize and monotonously recite "In Flanders Fields." Military recruiters are frequently brought in to sell war as an exciting adventure for broke students searching for a way to pay for tuition.

At the same time, schools must grapple with a mandate to be as inclusive and inoffensive as possible, celebrating diversity and multiculturalism and definitely not causing any "harm." As many students in any given school are likely to have experienced the trauma of war firsthand, the beleaguered teachers and students forced to organize the Dreaded Remembrance Day Assembly must at least nominally talk about peace. It is especially awkward this year, as our government and corporations continue to arm a rogue state that is committing a genocide that gets livestreamed to the kids on their phones.

This leads to some weird aesthetic decisions. My favourite was when a gung-ho recruiter straight out of a 60s-era Vietnam movie talked about the noble and thrilling mission in Afghanistan (to an audience that included Afghan refugees–that was before we barred them from coming in the country), and encouraged the kids to sign up to get blown up by an IED. This speech was followed by an absolutely brutal rendition of John Lennon's "Imagine." With lyrics. You know, the lyrics that are essentially "No Gods, No Masters," but somehow less cool? That one.

This year, one Ottawa school tried its best. Sir Robert Borden High School, located in an area with a large Arab population, played "Haza Salam." You can read the English translation in that video—it's pretty general and inoffensive. And prettier, musically, than "Imagine." I bet you can guess what happened next!

That's right! Triggered by having to hear Arabic, because the entire language is antisemitic now, some of the worst people—the Jewish Federation of Ottawa, the soon-to-be last democratically elected Prime Minister of Canada Pierre Poilievre. and Lisa MacLeod, an MPP who cut funding to autistic children in a decision so unpopular that she had to immediately be shuffled off elsewhere—started shrieking their lungs out. Naturally, the principal of the school, who presumably doesn't want to organize the Remembrance Day assembly by himself next year, stood behind the hardworking students and educational professi—ahahaha just kidding he totally threw them under the bus and apologized to these braying fascists. I'm fairly certain this is in violation of the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board's own human rights policy, but we all know this doesn't apply to Muslims or Arabs (and especially not to Palestinians). 

This kind of thing is increasingly common in schools, which have always been bastions of white supremacy but have been given tacit permission through the re-election of the Orange Man and the media coronation of our own Trumplet, Poliievre, who gets to be appointed Prime Minister without us even needing to have an election about it. The lip service to diversity and inclusion and belonging lasts only so long as it can be done away with, revealing the rot beneath. Get ready for a firehose of stories like this, as the authoritarian personalities who worm their way to the top are at last allowed to stop pretending that they think all children are equally human.

3Rs

Aug. 30th, 2024 12:54 pm
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
Another school year is bearing down on us. Instead of protecting our kids from the deadly pandemic giving them brain damage, most school boards in the Anglosphere are focused on banning cellphones and social media, or, further to the south, books about queer and Black people. Many provinces in Canada are fumbling over whether or not teachers should forcibly out trans kids to their potentially abusive parents. Centrist and far-right governments everywhere promise a return to the "3Rs*" and no gender funny business. If any government or board has addressed the myriad societal problems schoolteachers are expected to magically fix with the thing that would actually work—a giant injection of funding, social workers, school nurses, food programs, and housing-first services—I've yet to hear about it.

Into this fray, as always, stride the Facebook Posting Brigade, armed with memes explaining what subjects should be taught in school.

You know the ones.

359813049_6287501574678922_7294924079185606729_n

70233

And once again, because I'm a masochist, I gotta dive in and argue with people.

Most of the "courses" that people suggest are, in fact, taught in schools. Some, like taxes, can be taught in an afternoon and shouldn't be a full course. Others have their own course code. Your kid probably didn't gain the knowledge delivered for one of three reasons:

1) This was taught in an elective course, and it was cut, along with the teacher's job, so that corporations could get a tax break. You may have voted for the government that made that decision.
2) Your kid's teacher taught this skill as part of a core course, such as math or English, but your kid didn't learn it. Maybe taxes aren't relevant to them at age 15? Or they have anxiety around public speaking and got an accommodation so that they didn't have to present something to the class.
3) This knowledge is no longer relevant. Cars today are highly computerized and a regular person can't just maintain them like you're rebuilding a jalopy in the 1950s.

The ugly truth is that it's almost impossible to know what kind of information will be useful to someone years down the road. Even something as certain as taxes isn't actually that important, since we now have software to do it for us. When I was in school, we had to memorize basic numeracy, because "we wouldn't always have a calculator on us," which in hindsight is hilarious. Meanwhile, the large sheet of Victorian floral wallpaper that I had to design and painstakingly paint in watercolour** turned out to have taught me incredibly important skills and life lessons that I use to this day.

The best schools can do is supply your child with general knowledge that will allow them to establish an understanding of consensus reality, research and critical thinking skills that will help them navigate a rapidly changing world rife with disinformation, competencies in as many areas as possible, and connections with future paths for study and careers. Which includes code! But if the AI techbros are to be believed, those jobs will soon be obsolete too***, so they might be better off learning how to do watercolour.

I can't help but reflexively raging out at these memes, which I did at this one too until I saw the bottom text.

457247006_10169313566090080_6023494928772640420_n

This year, why not go easy on the teachers in your life, and let them do their jobs as best they can with no resources or support.

* As a pedantic child and an even more pedantic adult, this always bothered me immensely. Only one of these begins with an R. Why does no one else care?
** Each flower. Identical. By hand.
*** I'm not a Comp Sci expert and will leave it to them to predict the future of the field. I don't think this is the case. But I do think, in general, there will be fewer entry-level jobs in every sector as a result of not just automation but of employers knowing that they can fire two employees and get a third to absorb that workload lest she be fired too. Not speaking from experience, of course.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
Stephen Lecce, who forced another student to fuck a goat and has likely done so himself, announced new mandatory curriculum about the Holodomor. You can watch the whole press conference here if you want, or just skip to 6:20 for what I'm going to talk about.

Now, to get this out of the way, I don't think it's a bad thing to teach about the Holodomor. I've been on the education bus that he's talking about, and...it's fine? It's, as far as I can tell, a relatively factual exhibition on the atrocity. But obviously a guy like Lecce has an agenda beyond teaching kids about a genocide that happened 90 years ago and it has nothing to do with education and everything to do with propaganda: specifically ensuring that Ontario institutes a Florida-style anti-communist propaganda curriculum.
 
For some context: It has come to my attention that Ontario schoolchildren learn nothing about Nazi atrocities or the Holocaust in high school. This is fascinating to me because I learned a fair bit about it when I was in school, and we met with a survivor and learned about why and how this genocide happened. In general, we learned more about the war than the reasons for the war, but we did have clear education around why the Nazis were bad. Today's kids do not have that. I know this, because the subjects that I teach intersect quite frequently with this part of history and the kids profess ignorance of even basic facts. If this was just a post-covid thing it would make sense, since most of the current students I teach played video games through Grade 10 history, but this is a trend I've noticed ever since playing Call of Duty (the main way students learned about WWII before) became less popular. I asked some of my history teacher friends about what is taught, and apparently it's like. Optional. The justification is that we're a lot farther from WWII now than we were when we were all growing up, which is a baffling justification but there you have it.

Another bit of context: Edgelord teenagers draw swastikas more often than they draw hammers and sickles.

High school students only have one semester of mandatory history, in Grade 10. It focuses largely on Canadian contributions to [insert historical event here]. Weirdly, the Spanish Civil War, which we were forbidden to investigate when I was in high school, does get a mention. But the reason why they don't learn anything about the Holocaust is because what they learn is around the contributions of Canadian soldiers and the effect of the war on the home front. In that framing, it makes much more sense to talk about the Spanish Civil War, where at least Canadians fought (although they were blacklisted as "premature anti-fascists" when they returned home), vs. the Holodomor, which really just involved the USSR and Ukraine. I guess you could argue, as Lecce does in this video, that this is the reason why we have such a large Ukrainian-Canadian population, except that this is factually untrue. Also we interned Ukrainian immigrants in camps during and after WWI, which I think he neglects to mention when he refers to Canada as "the greatest country in the world" (citation needed). 

There are a lot of genocides to cover in that one semester, including many that were perpetrated by settler-Canadians against Indigenous peoples. Those ones are important to cover because they form the basis of the Canadian settler-colonialist extractive state from which we (excluding Indigenous people) all benefit, and which threatens to destroy all life on earth through the continued exploitation of fossil fuels. Others, like the Holocaust, are really important to cover because they're an obvious template for how genocides work—first through marginalization and dehumanization, then through extermination. And also because Canada's contribution to the Shoah is important to learn about, including the "none is too many" doctrine and the rejection of the MS St. Louis, where anti-semitic government policy led directly to the murders of Jewish refugees. We just didn't have very much to do with the Holodomor, and while it's important, it's not more important than King Leopold's genocide of the Congolese (1.3-13 million dead in 32 years), or Winston Churchill's engineered famine in Bangladesh (2.1–3 million dead in one year), or the genocide of the Armenians that continues to be carried out with the complicity of major world powers. The Holodomor is only special because it was perpetrated by communists, and far-right extremists like Lecce are determined to brand all left-wing ideologies as "extremist Marxist-Leninism." I can guarantee he's never read either Marx or Lenin, incidentally.

He also engages in some truly bizarre sophistry around Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Putin is not a communist. Present-day Russia is not communist and hasn't been since Lecce was five years old. Russia's imperialist ambitions towards Ukraine both pre-date and post-date its experiments with state communism.

The good news here, if there is in fact any good news, is that Lecce has very little to do with the curriculum-writing process in Ontario. I'm not actually sure that he knows how it works. Curriculum is written on a cycle of years—one of my subject areas was last updated in 2006, one in 2009, one in 2010, and one in 2019. Education ministers can certainly interfere with curriculum development, as they did when they cancelled the updating of several subject areas to include consultation with Indigenous peoples in response to the Truth and Reconciliation Calls to Action. But it's just as likely that they will declare a change, and then it will take so long to change that the next government in power wants a different thing. So I doubt Lecce will get a chance to implement his PragerU-style curriculum where Putin is a socialist and only Russia has ever done a genocide.

But it's still unsettling because it is really the first time I've seen an Ontario government declare that it is mandatory to educate against a particular ideology. I am in no way a fan of Stalin, but brainwashing children into a particular political opinion is what the opponents of public education claim that we're doing. I suspect that if you teach kids about Stalin and what he did very few of them are going to come out thinking that Stalin is cool and good, but it's also not very useful to learn about Stalin in isolation when, say, Hitler and Churchill committed similar atrocities for vastly different ideological reasons.

Far more extreme versions of this are happening elsewhere, and of course Florida begun literally incorporating PragerU content in its "education" system. Given the understandable sympathy that most Canadians feel for today's Ukrainian refugees, Lecce displays a very low form of cunning in using them as a shield for his indoctrination agenda, which has nothing to do with supporting Ukrainian victims of Russian imperialist aggressions and everything to do with instituting a climate of fear around any unpopular opinion by declaring it "communist."
sabotabby: (furiosa)
transphobia and suicide )

Why is my union negotiating with this child-killer and terrorist? We should refuse to enter the same room until he agrees to keep trans and nonbinary kids safe and alive.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
Dear every journalist who writes an article on this subject:

No, Grade 11 English courses do not typically do Shakespeare. They're definitely not doing Dickens anymore. This is not the 1950s. This is not even the 1990s. I'd say if you did a straw poll you'll find a lot of schools where they are now debating swapping out Hunger Games for Indigenous authors.

Most schools are already not doing Shakespeare because the language is too challenging for the kids. In my friend's son's Grade 11 university-level class, they did not even assign a single book. I'd estimate a good half of Grade 11 English courses are doing easy YA because the new philosophy is that if you make kids read something hard they will be turned off reading forever.
 
And yet every single news story about the Indigenous lit course references "swapping out Shakespeare," because rather than doing even the most cursory investigation, the writer assumes that nothing has changed since they went to high school. That, or these articles are being written by an extremely racist AI.

Here's CBC in 2017. Globe & Mail in 2017. Vice in 2020. Durham Region, 2022. CBC again in 2019. National Socialist Post in 2017 being typically fashy about it. The Record in 2021. Ottawa Citizen in 2020.
 
It's just an incredibly unwieldy way of admitting that you've never voluntarily read any fiction since you yourself left high school. Or bothered to investigate what students are actually learning.

No love,
Miss Tabby

P.S. Yes, this is a good move and should have been done years ago, across so-called Canada. I am celebrating the actual votes in at least two school boards that I know of so far. I am just deeply tired of the deliberately inflammatory and kneejerk framing.
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)
Today is a dark day for human rights. There is no longer any provincial government that is bound to respect civil liberties in so-called Canada. The Ford Regime has used the notwithstanding clause—the loophole in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms—to avoid playing fair at labour negotiations this time, but there is literally no reason for them, or any other government, to use it to quash any rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Charter. Quebec wants to put Muslims in camps? No problem. The unhinged banshee in Alberta wants to force trans people to detransition? No problem. Any majority provincial government has unlimited power for five years to oppress anyone they feel like oppressing.

If you don't believe me, here is the text of the bill. Note the following.

The Act limits the jurisdiction of the Ontario Labour Relations Board, arbitrators and other tribunals to make certain inquiries or decisions. It also provides for there to be no causes of action or proceedings against the Crown for certain acts. Certain proceedings are deemed to have been dismissed.

If you think this is in any way comparable to Trudeau's use of the Emergencies Act to quell a coup*, note that there is currently an inquiry happening right now about whether the use of the Emergencies Act was justified. Note that Ford is using his lawyers to avoid testifying despite saying that he agrees with Trudeau using it

Such an inquiry is not possible under the text of Bill 28. It. Bans. Inquiries. Other than the very superficial, toothless inquiry with no ability to enforce the findings.

This is the end of labour rights in Canada, but it is also the end of human rights.

If you are able to get to a protest or picket, please do so. Democracy doesn't end at the ballot box, and as we've seen, people are quite happy to vote their own human rights away. The only way this will be won is in the streets.

Solidarity to CUPE. An injury to one is an injury to all. FIGHT THIS.


*Which, note. I disagree with the use of the Emergencies Act—it's another loophole in democracy that shouldn't exist. I even wrote a book about why it's bad. Notwithstanding my own personal desire to see racists get arrested for trying to do a coup.
sabotabby: (furiosa)
I know everyone is all upset or amused, depending on your political persuasion, by some other big news right now, but I kinda had to share this before I forgot.

There is a thing called the Gord Downie & Chanie Wenjack Fund. The name alone needs some unpacking, especially if you live somewhere other than so-called Canada. Who are these names, you might ask? Not two people who ever met, that's for sure. Gord Downie was the lead singer of the Tragically Hip, who died rather tragically from cancer. Chanie Wenjack was a young Anishinaabe boy who, like many Indigenous children of his generation, was kidnapped and sent to residential school, where he was the victim of genocidal abuse. At 12 years old, he ran away and died of starvation and exposure.

Downie, in the last years of his life, was moved and horrified by Chanie's story. He set out to do something, and that something was a concept album and graphic novel about Chanie's life and death called The Secret Path. After his death the fund was established to educate and build awareness about residential schools. I'm reasonably sure that the proceeds didn't go to benefit Downie personally.

I've listened to a number of Indigenous people talk about this, and as you can imagine there are many different opinions. Most voices I've heard think that Downie absolutely had good intentions, but many are a little suspicious of this fund and also of the idea that this boy's story should have to be told by a wealthy white man in order for anyone to feel a certain way about it. I will not weigh in on it as I'm not Indigenous but I was sort of ambivalent. I don't use these sorts of materials in my classroom because I would prefer to highlight the work of Indigenous creators, many of whom have lived experience with residential schools and generational trauma.

All of this is to say that the fund sent around educational packages to schools this week. There was some good stuff in them, actually, including David A. Robertson's On the Trapline. And then I found these:

IMG_3416

Is it me or is it in poor taste that your branded swag for your fund that is literally named after a child who froze to death is...gloves? Kind of thin gloves???

Because I think it's gross, actually.

They say "do something" on them.

I don't blame Gord Downie for this, btw. By all accounts he was a decent guy. I want to believe he wouldn't have approved of this.

This is why the kids say reconciliation is dead.
sabotabby: (books!)
Allow me to hold forth on some unstructured thinky-thoughts that have been brewing in my head and came to an absolute boil when I checked Twitter this morning.

The Durham District School Board is currently engaged in a US-style school book banning, and one of the books that it pulled from its shelves is The Great Bear by Cree author David A. Robertson. I haven't read it as it targets a younger age group than I teach, but I have several of Robertson's other works and attended his talks and I can not possibly overemphasize how significant he is as an author and educator. His work speaks to young people, Indigenous and settler, in an accessible, direct, and authentic way. His work is particularly important for young people who struggle with reading. He's an absolute gift to English teachers.

Their rationale for censoring this book (sorry, conducting a fulsome review) is as follows:

An email, obtained by the Star, that was sent by the board to school principals says the books “do not align with the recently updated DDSB Indigenous Education policy and procedure.”
 
Ooookay then. Robertson thinks it's because the main character gets bullied and cuts off his braid. Which is an experience that many Indigenous youth have had. Then he regrows his hair as he gains self-confidence and connects with his culture.

In other words, the bean-counters don't like that a book by an Indigenous author might expose children to a specific trauma experienced by Indigenous children on a regular basis. Won't someone think of the children?

I am increasingly concerned about the weaponization of social justice language to achieve aims that are antithetical to social justice, particularly but not exclusively by institutions like school boards. In order to protect children from ever encountering a negative or uncomfortable emotion, the reading list has to be sanitized and purged of authentic experiences. 

In the US, this looks like Don't Say Gay bills, the Critical Race Theory scare, and banning Maus because of its depiction of mouse genitalia. In Canada, of course, we are Enlightened Progressives. So school boards, for example, do not want teachers using materials that have the N-word in them, because that might traumatize Black students. Except that this means I can't use films like I Am Not Your Negro or The Skin We're In, both of which are brilliant films by Black creators and centre the authentic experiences of Black people, and both of which use the N-word. The rhetoric used to justify this in Canada is always about social justice, anti-racism, equity, and diversity, but it's really about legal liability and the result is the silencing of important diverse voices.

Tangentially, I am absolutely fascinated by this excellent post about antis in fandom. The protection of theoretical children (in fandom, this means anyone in their 20s or even older, depending on their physical appearance) has taken on a hysterical tone in recent years, where some people are demanding protection from encountering work that may make them upset. These demands take the form of large-scale harassment campaigns, and notably, the targets of these campaigns are frequently labelled pedophiles.

At the root of most censorship campaigns, the urge to protect children from pedophiles (frequently combined with Satanists and/or Jews, depending on whether the quiet part is being said out loud or not) features prominently. It's notable to me that the "groomer" meme is weaponized both in fandom spaces, by ostensibly queer and marginalized young people for purposes of, supposedly, social justice, and by the far-right in demonizing queer and trans people. Obviously the latter group has much more political and legal clout, not to mention a higher body count, but the underlying impulse and structures are the same. Protect me from the thing that makes me, personally, uncomfortable, by making it unavailable to everyone. And use rhetoric about children and pedophiles to do so.

If you know me, you know that I'm quite far from being a free-speech absolutist. But I lean more in that direction when it comes to literature, because in general it's better to be able to have these works accessible and critiqued than to remove them from the discourse. And I am very skeptical when social justice language is severed from its meaning, which is to strive for a better, more just world. I am skeptical that school boards are in any way qualified to determine which texts can be taught in service of achieving that better, more just world. If you are so twisted up in your own rhetoric that you silence marginalized voices in your quest for safety, you are on the wrong side of history.

P.S. I am banning the word "fulsome," though. Along with "kind."
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
The Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board courageously voted to keep masking mandates and protect children until April 15, and Toronto and Toronto Catholic District School Boards meekly asked if Ford and his Goatfucker flunky might hold off a few more weeks before conducting their province-wide experiment on innocent kids.

Ford's response was predictable. While he spent most of his high school years outside dealing hash, and the Goatfucker attended a pay-to-play private school, they have decided that elected school boards will no longer have autonomy to protect the students in their care. This contravenes the advice of their own science table, doctors, and even Sick Kids (a corrupt institution that bears no small amount of responsibility for our current mess). It is anti-science, anti-democratic, and anti-human. One can only conclude that they want kids to die.

An interesting legal conundrum will be whether the kids who end up with their health, and potentially futures, curtailed by this decision will be able to launch a class action lawsuit. Given the poor settlements afforded to residential school survivors, I doubt it will make up for the trauma, but if I were a lawyer I'd be looking into this.
sabotabby: there's no point to an apocalypse if you still have to work (pointless apocalypse)
I appear to be stepping on toes no matter what I say. Today I've managed to piss off a number of people across the political spectrum by piecing together a conclusion based on the following information.

Assertion #1: Masking works better if everyone does it.

chart describing the different infection rates with different types of masks
Now, I don't know if this is accurate. It's definitely outdated, as Omicron is more contagious than Delta, and BA.2 is more contagious than Omicron. But if it's accurate (here is a link so you can investigate the veracity of the source), this is troubling. I wear a non-fit-tested KN95 FFR to work. The majority of my students and colleagues wear cloth masks or surgical masks. After March 21st, some will not wear any masks at all. The length of each class is 75 minutes. I teach 4 classes a day. At best, if there is an infected student wearing a similar mask to what I'm wearing, I will make it through the day without being infected. If the infected student is not wearing a mask, I have a strong likelihood of being infected by the end of the period.

Most schools will have 30 kids in a class. Statistically, some will not wear a mask. Protection drops with every unmasked student.

Assertion #2: There is no reporting on infection rates in schools, and no testing. Ontario currently has 2000-20,000 cases a day.

Assertion #3: While the mortality of covid is fairly well studied, morbidity is less so. We know that covid infection has a system-wide effect. To me, the most scary symptom of long covid is brain damage. Even mild covid can cause brain damage. It is also linked to heart and lung damage, fatigue, dizziness, and a host of other weird symptoms. We don't know its full effects or how much of this damage is reversible.

Assertion #4: The rates of long covid are completely unknown. How much do vaccines help? A study in Denmark (pre-print) suggests about a third. Here's another study with a breakdown of symptoms. Children are not immune. A British study showed 2-14% of infected children reported long covid symptoms, an Israeli study showed 11.2% showed some symptoms and 1.8-4.6% of them continued to experience symptoms six months later. It is unclear how much vaccination has an effect (non-peer-reviewed study, a study in Lancet). Vaccination in the 5-11 age group in Ontario is 55%, and kids under 5 can't be vaccinated.

conclusion, trigger warning )Logically, I know why people are not freaking out.

1. Everyone is exhausted.
2. Epidemiological data is super hard to understand, especially when you're exhausted.
3. There is a certain amount of denialism that's natural because you don't want to think about whether sending your kid off to school runs a 2% or a 30% chance of giving them brain damage.

Emotionally, I cannot understand why people freak out about a 13-year-old seeing cartoon mouse peen and not about the same 13-year-old experiencing lifelong neurological symptoms.

And I feel as though I'm inhabiting a completely different reality. I'm not even a science person! I'm not that well informed. But I gathered from my offensive post this morning that a lot of people are just unaware of the risks so I'm putting this out in the hopes that I'm either wrong and someone smart can explain why, or that someone more educated than I am will sound an alarm that will be heard.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
The Ford Regime has said that rapid antigen testing is unnecessary in public schools, where the children of plebes and unimportant people go. But it's available for the children of the elite in private schools. Funny how these tests are able to not only detect covid but also detect how much your parents make.

Also I somehow missed that the company that makes the tests is called the Creative Destruction Lab. WTF?

Private schools were also able to lower class sizes and improve ventilation. Some even have plexiglass installed between desks. Part of the reason I'm so pessimistic about us ever getting out of this covid mess is that the wealthy and powerful always manage to buy their way out of the dangers and inconveniences.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
All this week, I've been ruminating over September.

Our All-Knowing Overlords have made several declarations about the new school year. Vaccinations will not be mandatory for staff and students. Families will be free to kill or cripple others because God forbid we should trample on anyone's deeply held beliefs (that they acquired from reading Facebook). They're instituting a bizarre timetable for high schoolers that combines the worst parts of the semester schedule—jugging four courses at a time—with the worst parts of the quadmester system—condensed time frame and extra-long classes—with alternating weeks to maximize how confused the kids can get. I bet you're confused just reading that. Add to this that teachers will be required to simultaneously teach to the virtual kids at home and the live classes, with zero instruction as to how to do this and I'm sure zero technology to assist with it, and you've got another year where students will learn nothing. Masking is mandatory, except for the 40-minute period where students will sit in underventilated rooms and expose each other and their teachers to covid over lunch. There will also be sports and wind instruments to ensure that outbreaks happen. In theory, there's an attempt at cohorting with the alternating schedule, but in practice everyone's together for lunch, recess, extracurriculars, and the bit at the end of the day when all the kids get out of class and immediately start licking each other's faces.

The emphasis continues to be on hygiene theatre and fomite transmission. Cleaning surfaces is much cheaper than reducing class sizes, but doesn't actually make much of a difference in covid transmission.

At the same time, our new provincial chief medical officer of health has issued a call to "normalize" covid in schools.

Basically, the authorities—who, I might add, haven't set foot in a high school since their own school days, and many of them were "educated" at private schools or homeschooled—have thrown their hands up and said, "let's just infect all the kids."

I've been reading a lot of about Delta, Delta+, and especially Long Covid. Long Covid can occur in up to 2% of children, whether or not these children were asymptomatic or seriously ill. It's been linked to an average 7-point drop in IQ.* It's linked to neurological problems, lung and heart issues, chronic fatigue—and no one knows if it's permanent.

This morning, I was talking to a teacher on Facebook who contracted covid in March from a student who lied on the self-screening that is also part of the hygiene theatre we were required to perform. Five months later, they remain ill with constant headaches and exhaustion. They have no idea how they will function in September. This is not an uncommon story. It is unlikely that anyone responsible—be it the school, the board, or the government—will be held accountable for deliberately giving this person a chronic disability that they may need to manage for the rest of their lives.

It boggles my mind that workers can be injured at work, entirely due to the negligence of the employer, and have to muddle on with no compensation or support. It's not just teaching, of course, and this isn't a new issue. I believe our discussions around health and safety would be very different if every time a worker was injured by employer greed, that employer was responsible for providing for them. But workers are disposable—teachers especially, since there are more teachers than jobs—and so we'll be chewed up and tossed out.

Do parents really want to risk sending their kids to school, knowing that they may come out physically or cognitively damaged? I suspect parents are just tired, more than anything else. The US has normalized the risk of school shootings, so there's definitely precedent. Apparently it's an acceptable balance of rights. Some kids will get shot so that gun hoarders can continue to hoard guns. Some kids will be permanently disabled, and a few will die, so that anti-vaxxers can continue to peddle their conspiracy theories and the province doesn't go into deficit spending.

I want to go back in person too. I loathe teaching online and I desperately want to return to normal. But I'm terrified. Unlike the people making these decisions, I know what it's like to have your life curtailed by chronic illness and disability. It's made me unkind. It's made me wish brain fog and shortness of breath and heart palpitations and chronic pain on the government that has decreed our lives and our kids' lives to be worthless, and to their accomplices in the medical field who've provided a smoke screen for the impending atrocity.

* Obligatory reminder that IQ is a eugenics-inspired bullshit measure of intelligence. That said, normally if you take two IQ tests, you should score better on the second one, because one thing IQ tests are very good at measuring is one's ability to take IQ tests. If you do worse on the second, it's an indication of cognitive decline, which is a very real thing.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
Schools and childcare centres recorded 614 cases of COVID-19 today. That's 26.3% of all provincial cases for today (March 30, 2021).

In honour of this fact, I'd like to share a poem I wrote with y'all. It's not a very good poem and neither is our situation.

It's Okay
Schools are safe
and if they're not safe
that's okay
because kids don't get covid
and if they do
that's okay
because it's not that serious
and they don't spread it
and if it's serious
and if they spread it
that's okay
because they got it from the teacher
and if there's a lot of cases
that's okay
because we changed the definition of outbreak
keep moving the goalposts
and it will always be okay

166964638_4585097734840241_1976782304889237147_n

166746111_4585099781506703_746026854149710694_n

While the rest of the developed world is getting vaccinated, Ontario is building more field hospitals, and a secret memo that got leaked informs us that the situation is fine, since they have the capacity to handle all the death and illness that is about to be unleashed by the deliberate political decision to let the virus run rampant.

Fucksake

Feb. 11th, 2021 03:27 pm
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
So our overlords, in their quest to murder as many education workers and children as possible, have decided to increase the potential for infections by postponing March Break—five days that are unpaid for staff—until April 12.

Only people with the means to travel will do so during March Break, and they'll do so whether schools close or not. In fact, St. Michael's, where Goatfucker Stephen Lecce attended, will be having a super duper two-week long March Break to allow families to gallivant around and spread covid to ski resorts and developing countries. Those dears need a break from assaulting each other with hockey sticks on the locker room, I suppose. The Ontario Legislature, which is on holiday more often than not, will also be closing for March Break. But not students and teachers.

There's no real justification—students haven't "lost" time and like I said, aren't going to be prevented from travelling during this time. What it will do is increase stress in an already over-stressed workforce. It's yet another change that we now need to plan around, because this is a government that likes changing things just to keep everyone on edge.

It also massively increases the chance of death. While schools are closed, the potential for students and teachers to get infected is quite low, unless they're being stupid. Vaccination for teachers is supposedly going to begin in April. So by pushing it forward, it gives one more week for people to get sick and get others sick, which I guess is the point.

I don't know when society decided that it was best if children were taught by physically and mentally ill exhausted workers, but there you have it.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
 We all know there are people with very low executive function.

This is most of my students. They're smart as hell, but when it comes to things like remembering to bring a pen and pencil to class, they just can't, and if they're given a form to get signed at home, that form will inevitably end its life, crumpled, shredded, and unsigned, in the pocket dimension at the bottom of their backpack. They know the material but can't write the test. Etc.

There are people with very low executive function, who have developed workarounds.

This is me, and most of my closest friends. I can't make it out of bed in the morning, so I set my alarm two hours early to start waking me up. I can't remember anything so I keep three separate to-do lists. I can't motivate myself through any means beyond raging anxiety, so either I do a task immediately, or I procrastinate forever. I somehow manage to exist, but every day is a struggle.

Presumably, there are people with the normal amount of executive function, and they go around unbothered by life and everything is fine.

But I would posit the existence of a fourth class of people, and these are people with too much executive function to the point where it is detrimental to both their lives and society as a whole. These are people for whom executive functions are an end unto themselves. As long as boxes are generated and checked, and everyone is very busy, work is getting done and progress is being made. These are people for whom rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic seems like a good and feasible plan, because you are taking action and doing things.

I would posit that very early in life, and in many careers, an unhealthy level of executive function is rewarded. This is mostly the key to success in school, far more important than intellectual capability. And in white collar work, looking busy while accomplishing nothing is a useful skill. But I would also say that these are the sorts of people who end up promoted above their level of competence— school boards and governments are full of them. Everyone who has ever suffered through a PowerPoint explaining the new educational jargon through Venn diagrams has encountered this sort of person.

They are the sort who tend to be particularly impressed if you add "smart" or "enhanced" before a word but don't actually change anything.

Right now, they are making decisions that would better fall to people with perhaps lower capacity for navigating institutions and systems, but higher levels of intelligence, wisdom, and empathy. Life and death decisions.

I could be talking out of my ass. It has been known to happen. I'm pretty sure if I were a higher functioning sort, I could brand this into a PowerPoint somehow and make a decent living as an educational consultant, and I wouldn't have to go back into a plague box next week.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
Teachers in Ontario really need to get it out in the news that we have been teaching, and students have been learning, this whole time. I’m seeing ostensibly “progressive” groups like People For Education pushing this narrative that if we don’t get kids back in school ASAP (sitting in desks in rows with masks strapped to their faces and in mortal danger, which as we know is the best way to learn) that they will somehow “lose their year.”

Meanwhile our instructional minutes have increased and besides, didn’t Lecce say that online learning was so awesome it needs to be mandatory?

I'm used to being loathed and gaslit by the right, but I'll never get used to being thrown under the bus by the left. I had to request that folks on FB filter me out of their pro-school-reopening posts because it's causing me anxiety attacks on a daily basis to know just how many people are happy to risk my life.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
Ont. doctor suggests cancelling March Break to prevent another COVID-19 spike

The vast majority of public health professionals bowed to political pressure to reopen schools, despite having no clue as to the long-term health impacts of covid on children. They demonstrated a homicidal variant of expertise creep, believing because they understood (poorly) epidemiology, they were experts on what went on in a school building, all the time refusing to listen to the actual experts.

Worse, they arrogantly refused to admit that they were wrong, opening schools was dangerous and irresponsible, and it is even more dangerous and irresponsible to do so now, with Turbo Covid and vastly higher rates of infection in the mix.

And now they want to take away our fucking March Break.

They could just stop non-essential travel. You want your kid in school, you don't get that vacation to Florida. Instead they want to take away our one week (which I will be using to catch up on the extra workload they've heaped on us) because the general public can't fucking follow rules.

These people are going to be the death of me. Possibly literally.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
I will be chronicling the deaths of every education worker and student in Toronto who dies as a result of the Ford Regime's murderous decision to reopen schools in the middle of a pandemic. This will continue until the numbers grow too great for me to keep track of, the pandemic ends, or I die.

Jill Dupuis

Here is her class website. She seems like she'd be a great teacher. She was a nerd and had a loving family and cat.

Death toll: 2

What we know so far: Jill Dupuis, age 44, teacher at Glen Williams School in Georgetown, died after battling COVID for weeks in the ICU. This puts the timeline of infection in early December, which means  that she was possibly/probably infected in the line of duty, but the article suggests she might not have been teaching live.

Excuses given in the media: None; the article is sympathetic to the victim and her family, but does not speculate if she was murdered by the Ontario school system or not.

Quote: “Jill knew that too and took absolutely every precaution she could take. She stayed home pretty well all the time and only went out to doctor’s appointments or to pick up a prescription or groceries. We don’t even know where she caught it.”

Don't forget, don't look away, and always remember that this was a choice.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
Feeling the need to note this for posterity, as my memory isn't good but it's better than that of any public official in office.

From August to September, the threshold for declaring an epidemic in a school was two infections in the same building.

In November, 12 students infected in one school is not considered an outbreak. Nor 9 students and 4 teachers. There is no threshold for declaring an outbreak. Outbreaks cannot happen in schools, because schools are safe and kids need to be in schools for their mental health.

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 23 45
678 910 1112
131415 1617 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 03:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags