LJ is still a little relevant
Sep. 23rd, 2011 06:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm consciously avoiding Facebook these days. I don't even want to look at it. I gather there are probably some features on it that I need to disable.
Facebook's effect on social networking reminds me of what happened with Chapters-Indigo in Canada. All of the small publishers and bookstores went out of business, and everyone had to go to Chindigo, and then Chindigo realized that it was much more profitable to sell a small number of popular books and lots of diaries and scented candles. So everyone ditched and started buying books on Amazon. I don't know what the SNS equivalent of Amazon is.
I'm avoiding G+ because nymwars have resulted in practically no one I know using it for anything other than posting about nymwars.
I'm trying to like Tumblr but there is not a convenient way to comment. It doesn't feel very social or interactive to just click a heart. And I'm not sure that there is a big audience for pictures of pulp sci-fi covers that look like they have dicks on them, which appears to be the theme I've fallen into.
So I'm glad LJ is still here.
And also because I love you guys.
Facebook's effect on social networking reminds me of what happened with Chapters-Indigo in Canada. All of the small publishers and bookstores went out of business, and everyone had to go to Chindigo, and then Chindigo realized that it was much more profitable to sell a small number of popular books and lots of diaries and scented candles. So everyone ditched and started buying books on Amazon. I don't know what the SNS equivalent of Amazon is.
I'm avoiding G+ because nymwars have resulted in practically no one I know using it for anything other than posting about nymwars.
I'm trying to like Tumblr but there is not a convenient way to comment. It doesn't feel very social or interactive to just click a heart. And I'm not sure that there is a big audience for pictures of pulp sci-fi covers that look like they have dicks on them, which appears to be the theme I've fallen into.
So I'm glad LJ is still here.
And also because I love you guys.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 04:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 04:55 am (UTC)Also, one of my dear friends will seriously go on FB for hours and post weird stories from some Chinese news site, and hence my feed is 90% stories of two-headed goats in rural China.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 04:57 am (UTC)There are things I need FB for; without it, I'd never get invited to demos, shows, or parties. I find the event function really useful. But LJ is what I like using teh intertubes for.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 04:58 am (UTC)I'd syndicate but there's too much RL in my FB now. There's RL in my LJ too, but no work or family crossover.
The thing I don't like about Wordpress is the lack of threaded comments. If they fixed that, and there was more cross-linking and community stuff going on, I'd maybe start one.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 05:18 am (UTC)I'm not using the crossposter myself, because I stopped posting full entries to LJ in protest over some of their stupidity, but I did use the importer when I created my DW account, and a fair percentage of the folks I know on DW are using the crossposter to be simultaneously present on LJ and DW. (And through a different mechanism, I crosspost to other sites in case DW ever dies.)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 06:42 am (UTC)I have one old friend on there who occasionally posts big, long notes about contentious topics in an attempt to stir up discussion (with a fair bit of success - a lot of people do seem to comment, though I have no idea how they keep track of the discussion - I certainly couldn't!). The first time or two I saw one of those I did comment, but it was frustrating not knowing if anyone had replied unless I remembered to go back to it and sift through a ton of comments to see if any of them referenced what I'd written. And then at one point he got mad at me because I mentioned that I had not read every single comment on one of his posts before writing mine. But there were 150 comments, and I have a life...
LJ's threaded discussions, with replies e-mailed to you, are about 1000% easier to follow, at least for me.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 06:50 am (UTC)I do find that the ease of posting short little tidbits on FB can be seductive. But when all online social interaction gets reduced to those, we lose a lot of real connection. You can't really express anything very complex or challenging in the textual equivalent of a TV sound-bite...
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 01:55 pm (UTC)I love you too!
Facebook is the ninth circle of hell and I am only on G+ in the hopes that if everyone gets on G+ it will start being relevant. And if they don't like my nym they can blow me. As for tumblr, no comments = no Pyth.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:12 pm (UTC)It's still beta-ish.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:15 pm (UTC)Uh... if you promise that you're not a troll or an axe-murderer or something like that.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:15 pm (UTC)Do you want I should bring my harddrive today with a vast collection of torrented telly and movies?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:17 pm (UTC)PS: I love your sci-fi dick pictures
...
that could perhaps have been phrased better.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:26 pm (UTC)