Sure, I don't need a fuckbot. Fuckbots are just very useful. Machine sex is also superior to sex with humans in a few ways. Machines may be disadvantaged in that they cannot love, but this is only a disadvantage if you want love with your orgasms. Sometimes I want orgasms to come with a side of affection, but not always.
So my question is this: is there something inherently bad about getting pleasure from a machine? What is it that makes us suspicious of a hug-machine? I have a gut feeling that there's something creepy about a hug machine, but I can't rationalize it. I can see that I might lose something valuable if I never sought people-hugs once I had machine-hugs, but is there any evidence to suggest this would be the case? Do people want to have less sex if they have orgasm-producing machines?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:11 am (UTC)So my question is this: is there something inherently bad about getting pleasure from a machine? What is it that makes us suspicious of a hug-machine? I have a gut feeling that there's something creepy about a hug machine, but I can't rationalize it. I can see that I might lose something valuable if I never sought people-hugs once I had machine-hugs, but is there any evidence to suggest this would be the case? Do people want to have less sex if they have orgasm-producing machines?