As a second-year undergrad, I spent a considerable amount of time apartment-hunting. One of the many places I investigated was a shitty hovel at Spadina and Dupont. It was a basement, and too small for me and my then-prospective roommate, but there was a painting on the wall that gave me pause. It was a white canvas covered with black writing. In even, block letters, it read: "I want to be William S. Burroughs. I want to be Tom Waits. I want to be Hunter S. Thompson. I want to be Ernest Hemingway. I want to be Jack Kerouac." And so on. I was far more interested in the painting, and the sentiment, than in the apartment itself. It seemed to sum up the totality of my 20-year-old existence.
Only later did it occur to me that all of the people to which I, and the unknown artist, aspired to be were male, and nearly all white, and, furthermore, suggested a certain type of masculinity. Kind of odd, as I've always identified as female, and more towards the femme end of the spectrum if I have to pick an end. But much of what I admire—of course, very much influenced by a patriarchal culture—is considered traditionally masculine. I like to wear dresses, but preferably paired with Docs. I'm a teacher, but I teach tech, dammit. I clean up well, but I can't be arsed to wax and pluck and worry about makeup. Tools are rad. I like sci-fi. I don't watch what I eat when I'm on a date. I only read women's magazines to rail about the sexist stereotypes in them. I like action movies and not romantic comedies. I'm a beer woman on a champagne budget.*
This isn't self-hate, or anti-feminism. Well, I mean, part of it is that I consider myself a Serious Person, and the things that our culture marks as Serious are male things. (Action movies are just as silly as romantic comedies, but one is marginally more respectable. It is fine to be obsessed with sports, but not with shopping.) Part of it is that I went through a phase of liking certain literature from an era where women were not free to have adventures, a phase I was only cured of upon reading the autobiography of Kerouac's neglected daughter. But I think quite a bit of it is that the skills and interests coded as masculine tend to be practical and public, while those coded as feminism (cooking and crafting aside, and cooking can be coded as masculine) tend to be private and time-consuming without a lot of pay-off.
That brings me to
dimethirwen's awesome post about Esquire articles about things men should know, and how there ought to be a list of things people should know. I grew up watching a lot of Bond movies (don't ask) and was left with the lingering sense that it's important to be a great shot, bluff in poker, and know your drinks. And wire your own lights, which I can do and Bond never did to my knowledge.
I think I'm rambling a bit, but what I take from the articles
dimethirwen linked to, and the painting that caught my eye a decade ago, is that my relationship with independent and rebellious masculinity is, well, slightly complicated. I mean, I identify with and write these hyper-masculine characters (male and female; everyone's a badass), but cojones are not the only marker of strength. I suppose my ideal of both masculinity and femininity ends in the same place—to paraphrase a macho revolutionary, to "endure without ever losing tenderness."
Which is to say that we should all probably know how to wield a hammer and also to hem pants, but Esquire is still bloody ridiculous. Skinning an animal? I doubt your average Esquire reader is capable enough to get off his couch and buy a burger from a supermarket.
Anyway. What traits or skills of traditional masculinity or traditional femininity would your enlightened, progressive self like to see preserved?
* Richard Brautigan being yet another icon of rebellious masculinity.
Only later did it occur to me that all of the people to which I, and the unknown artist, aspired to be were male, and nearly all white, and, furthermore, suggested a certain type of masculinity. Kind of odd, as I've always identified as female, and more towards the femme end of the spectrum if I have to pick an end. But much of what I admire—of course, very much influenced by a patriarchal culture—is considered traditionally masculine. I like to wear dresses, but preferably paired with Docs. I'm a teacher, but I teach tech, dammit. I clean up well, but I can't be arsed to wax and pluck and worry about makeup. Tools are rad. I like sci-fi. I don't watch what I eat when I'm on a date. I only read women's magazines to rail about the sexist stereotypes in them. I like action movies and not romantic comedies. I'm a beer woman on a champagne budget.*
This isn't self-hate, or anti-feminism. Well, I mean, part of it is that I consider myself a Serious Person, and the things that our culture marks as Serious are male things. (Action movies are just as silly as romantic comedies, but one is marginally more respectable. It is fine to be obsessed with sports, but not with shopping.) Part of it is that I went through a phase of liking certain literature from an era where women were not free to have adventures, a phase I was only cured of upon reading the autobiography of Kerouac's neglected daughter. But I think quite a bit of it is that the skills and interests coded as masculine tend to be practical and public, while those coded as feminism (cooking and crafting aside, and cooking can be coded as masculine) tend to be private and time-consuming without a lot of pay-off.
That brings me to
I think I'm rambling a bit, but what I take from the articles
Which is to say that we should all probably know how to wield a hammer and also to hem pants, but Esquire is still bloody ridiculous. Skinning an animal? I doubt your average Esquire reader is capable enough to get off his couch and buy a burger from a supermarket.
Anyway. What traits or skills of traditional masculinity or traditional femininity would your enlightened, progressive self like to see preserved?
* Richard Brautigan being yet another icon of rebellious masculinity.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:34 am (UTC)A lot of the things on that list, male or female, most people I know either dont have a need to do it, or theyd just pay someone else to.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:42 am (UTC)Because it is so easy and so delicious.
Actually, in general, everyone should know how to cook. And clean (all the things). And do laundry. Self-sufficiency: it's what's for breakfast.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 08:49 pm (UTC)This.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:49 am (UTC)Everything else is pretty optional.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:30 am (UTC)And doing the math when you can't get gauge, but are determined to use that yarn for that project anyhow.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 08:22 am (UTC)Someone skilled with a slide rule can give you a (usually accurate enough) answer to any problem involving addition, multiplication, division, and exponentiation (assuming one has a decent slide rule) in a fraction of the time someone with a calculator can.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 01:41 am (UTC)I always thought this whole identity-lists thing was some kind of fetish.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 02:18 am (UTC)to me the most exciting things are female. they are complicated and communicative.
(I can't make sense anymore because I been home alone all day and too much on the computer and writing) but thats my list.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 05:27 am (UTC)What does it say about me that I always wanted to be James Bond, but look like a Bond Girl?
*shame*
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 06:22 am (UTC)Chop wood, build a fire, cook stuff, bake stuff, quote Star Wars at appropriate times.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 08:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 08:32 am (UTC)1. Figure out a bus/train/metro map/schedule (for city dwellers)
2. Know how to hail a taxi (I'll admit, I'm not good at this. Fortunately, whenever I've needed a taxi, I've been with a woman who was.)
3. Know how to keep a level head in an emergency.
3.5 Know how to calm others in an emergency.
4. Stop bleeding. Heck, CPR is good, too.
5. Know the croaky chorus from the "Frogs", by Aristophanes, as well as what this requirement refers to.
6. Be able to read a map.
7. Be able to intervene in a situation to keep someone out of danger.
Otherwise, I have to go with Heinlein.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 12:27 pm (UTC)2. Bottle feed a kitten
3. Tie a bow tie
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 08:45 pm (UTC)I love your take on Leia and Vader.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 08:44 pm (UTC)That was the problem: You should have played Aliens.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 07:04 pm (UTC)I've never got that - beyond perhaps not ordering the most expensive thing on the menu if you are going Dutch. It's like women allegedly being uncomfortable ordering pints of beer or enjoying real ales - although apparently this trend is changing.
Argue with a European without getting xenophobic or insulting soccer.
Since they felt that merited a point, I'm guessing all Esquire readers are tossers? I gave up on the list at that point, but I'm betting that 'Learn how to talk to a woman without gazing at her chest' is somewhere further down?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 08:50 pm (UTC)-change a diaper and soothe a baby
-operate a firearm
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:52 am (UTC)not just sew on a button (without it falling off), but sew on a patch and know some basic stitches so you can fix basic things like hem pants or put things back together
take care of people (or animals or plants) when they're sick
take care of your house by yourself and make it a beautiful place
be supportive of others, be supportive of yourself (just nurture other creatures in the world, I guess)
for masculine things, I suppose I think it's things like: be able to fix some basic plumbing and car stuff, household repairs, and where to hit people when you're in a fight.
When I was a kid, I wanted to be Indiana Jones, minus the kissing. I always pretended to be Indiana Jones.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 07:12 am (UTC)______
* Whether this is at all an interesting social phenomenon to consider remains unclear. I don't think a proper materialist would care: the markets are roughly equivalent in the amount of capital in them.
** And you're no exception.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 08:39 pm (UTC)Yup. I'm always annoyed when someone says feminism is not about making women more like men. In many ways, it is. "Different voice feminism" is often an oxymoron and a lot of pop-pych nonsense, such as "Men are afraid of commitment." All sane, independent people are cautious about commitment. It's called being serious and responsible with everyone's feelings. And being a rebel is healthy for everybody.