Rather startled Star Wars reaction
Dec. 24th, 2015 10:19 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I genuinely liked it. As in into every second of it and applauded various creative decisions and almost, almost forgive J.J. Abrams for screwing up Star Trek.
I had zero expectations, as part of the generation that was betrayed by the prequels, and even though it had good reviews, I did not believe it would be good until:
Anyway really happy to be wrong.
I had zero expectations, as part of the generation that was betrayed by the prequels, and even though it had good reviews, I did not believe it would be good until:
- Opening crawl with no mention of trade federations or taxes or anything.
- No fucking green screen CGI bullshit.
- Completely ignores the existence of the prequels.
- Stormtrooper with PTSD.
- Actual blood when people die! Violence has consequences and it's not a mindless cartoon.
- The setting felt lived-in, and like they were picking up from the fallout of the first three. I particularly loved Rey living in the ruins of an AT-AT.
- Lucky for Poe that he found the one Stormtrooper with a good aim.
- There were nods to the originals, but also subversions. While Rey is Luke's daughter, probably, you got to know the characters as people rather than Chosen Ones. Very little mystical bollocks. They destroyed the Starkiller by utilization of everyone's knowledge base + lots and lots of firepower, rather than one special guy turning off his targeting system and trusting Space Jesus.
- I really loved the new characters. I was predisposed to like Finn because of Boyega's role in Attack the Block, but they were all good, and quite decent acting from everyone involved.
- Minimal silly alien shit. The new droid and new little alien were cute but not cloying, like they are marketable as toys but also not annoying for adults.
- Leia. Unapologetically old and not thin and she's still a total badass and I love her.
- Roles for Han and Chewy that felt necessary and not like fanservice.
- Bechdel win. Places where you would expect a bit character to be male (or white) and then they weren't.
- Rey not getting shunted aside so that one of the dudes could have the crowning moment of badassery at the end. Nope, she's the heroine. Awesome.
- The Triumph of the Will scene, in case you weren't sure if the Empire were supposed to be Space Nazis.
- Your latest favourite Twitter account: Emo Kylo Ren.
Anyway really happy to be wrong.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-24 04:14 pm (UTC)Thanks for the Emo Kylo Ren recommendation. Best tweets I can't share.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-24 04:24 pm (UTC)Mildly Entertaining
Date: 2015-12-24 06:24 pm (UTC)Like you, I believe J.J. Abrams had screwed up the two Star Trek movies that he did. Unlike you, I was not impressed with "The Force Awakens". Mind you, I found it entertaining. But its slavish remake of "A New Hope" and some further vague writing left me feeling unimpressed. I only hope that Rian Johnson does better than this.
Re: Mildly Entertaining
Date: 2015-12-25 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-25 02:20 am (UTC)That would mean, I can see(z) as in seize it with the kids? I tend to avoid doing that but Princess Mononoke was a nice surprise (and I share your reluctance because I have the same difficulty relating to animated figures unless really, really well made and she and the story was) and they've seen Tolkien, Monty Python's Graal and stuff like that so are no whiners; they can actually be good fun at times like these and invading the house today (say no more) but you never know...hope so; I'm going to see some films (apart from Holmes of whom I'm now tired;) but this means, one has to go outside and then to a cinema, right?
I always liked the actress who does Leia and after not only that Blues Brothers scene (where I love her looks&acting) she sure needs her revenge!
no subject
Date: 2015-12-25 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-25 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-25 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-02 01:56 am (UTC)But yeah, the kids should love it too. :)
no subject
Date: 2015-12-25 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-25 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-26 12:06 am (UTC)Rey and Finn both awesome. Loved that they have as one of the main heroes a soldier who refused to kill.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-26 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-27 06:15 pm (UTC)What's disappointing is it sounds like now they're set up to just keep bringing out sequels and prequels forever. The next one is apparently something right before Episode IV but with all new characters. I'm only interested if they get Tom Stoppard to write it and it's effectively Rosencrantz & Gildenstern in Space.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-27 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-31 07:06 pm (UTC)Seriously.
http://jvmatucha.livejournal.com/590897.html
no subject
Date: 2015-12-31 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-02 02:03 am (UTC)I think they needed to keep it this close to the core of what the OT was in order to win our trust, so that we would be willing to follow them further into new territory for the next ones. They've shown that they understand the roots, that the get what Star Wars is in a way even George Lucas seems to have forgotten about.
I can't wait for 2017. :D
no subject
Date: 2016-01-02 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-02 02:22 am (UTC)dear diary
hux and i have made livejournal accounts
his name on it is starkiller and mine is xXxVaderxXx
7:41 AM - 24 Dec 2015
But get this. LiveJournal doesn't recognize the name.
He made a joke about it but didn't do it.
.
.
.
We could do it. :DDD
Anyone feel like grabbing it and channelling their angsty inner teen? Maybe write some bad poetry? :DDD
no subject
Date: 2016-01-02 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-05 12:32 pm (UTC)should involve lots of kissingthey might get to figure out for themselves.I am still on adrenaline high and reading everyone's weeks old star Wars posts, will get around to appreciating your Atlas Shrugged post soon.
no subject
Date: 2016-01-05 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-05 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-05 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-05 01:13 pm (UTC)