Bits and pieces
Feb. 7th, 2006 10:06 amPaying to stay alive, part II:
jk_fabiani has a horror story.
"Perhaps after the surgery I'll have around $100,000 dollars of debt, but hey, wouldn't you pay that to save your own life?"
Yes, but no one should have to make that sort of choice.
I did say that I wasn't going to go on about the stupid cartoons, but in case you still thought that this was about equal-opportunity freedom of speech blah-de-blah, it appears that Jyllands-Posten has a double standard. (Via
springheel_jack and my overloaded inbox.)
In related news, just because the other kid started it doesn't mean that you get to be a moron, too.
And finally, good news: IWW Toronto is now officially a branch. Go us!
"Perhaps after the surgery I'll have around $100,000 dollars of debt, but hey, wouldn't you pay that to save your own life?"
Yes, but no one should have to make that sort of choice.
I did say that I wasn't going to go on about the stupid cartoons, but in case you still thought that this was about equal-opportunity freedom of speech blah-de-blah, it appears that Jyllands-Posten has a double standard. (Via
In related news, just because the other kid started it doesn't mean that you get to be a moron, too.
And finally, good news: IWW Toronto is now officially a branch. Go us!
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 03:55 pm (UTC)Nose, mouth, chin. All gone. Horror story. She even saw it in the mirror.
This was in Yahoo yesterday, She went public with the rather good results of the surgery.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 05:39 pm (UTC)when iwas there, he would attack me with kitchen knives and we'd fight it out until first blood.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:11 pm (UTC)i forgot to mention his most common way of waking me up: humping my legs.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 04:50 pm (UTC)My ex-fiance's cat gnawed on me a bit, but he didn't mean anything by it.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 04:48 pm (UTC)Perhaps she was trying to backpedal from what had been said in the Media before.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 08:21 pm (UTC)AllahTommy for Medicare!no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 08:34 pm (UTC)Holy healthcare
Date: 2006-02-07 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-07 11:33 pm (UTC)I'm trying to see an essential difference between Muslims who find sufficient offence to cause them to resort to violence and those who would throw people into jail for performing the symbolic act of burning a US flag. It's very difficult.
In both cases, people have missed the boat. The prohibition of making images of Mohammed (and a more general prohibition against images of animate beings) had the intent of discouraing idolatry. That people resort to violence about depictions of Mohammed that are not likely to be objects of veneration by the faithful not only misses the original point, but seems to make a idol of not making images of Mohammed.
Similarly, banning the symbolic act of burning a flag completely misses the ideals on which the US was founded, as expressed in the Constitution.
I noticed the Onion has announced the opening of an additional circle of Hell. I think I have a clue about what sort of people wind up there.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 02:41 pm (UTC)I don't think violence is justified in this case, but it's telling that the most significant act of violence -- the killing of four protesters in Afghanistan, was done by either NATO troops or their Afghan allies. There have been images made of Mohammad before that have not had that sort of effect; the riots, I think, stem from the larger political context as much as they stem from misguided religious zealotry.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 09:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-08 02:51 pm (UTC)It's interesting that people call it the government's mouthpiece; the impression we're getting here is that the government is trying to distance itself from the whole thing and saying that it has nothing to do with them.
Ugh
Date: 2006-02-16 06:47 pm (UTC)Makes me wonder more and more about what you guys have up north (and over-seas as well, at least in most of western Europe)that I'm missing down here.