In lieu of a substantial post...
Apr. 10th, 2006 04:38 pmBackground for non-Canuckistanis. (Note:
himy announced his intention to run—despite massive political differences with the party—as a nuisance candidate. I'm holding him to it.)
[Poll #707778]
Because I'll place non-monetary bets on anything, you know.
[Poll #707778]
Because I'll place non-monetary bets on anything, you know.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 09:26 pm (UTC)What the hell is Bob Rae doing running as a Liberal anyway?
no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 09:33 pm (UTC)I think Rae always was a Liberal, judging by his screwing of the working class and such.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 09:40 pm (UTC)I do know I don't want Ignatieff and I've never heard of Blais. It's not like we'll get to vote on it. Supposedly, Gerard Kennedy is a favourite.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 10:33 pm (UTC)Kennedy strikes me as a long-shot, despite what
no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 09:59 pm (UTC)Hall Findlay looks a bit young. I also don't know her although I'm starting to pay attention to her.
I'm pretty convinced that Ignatieff won't win. He's too self-sufficient. He laughs when asked uncomfortable questions and then gives glib answers. Also, he's lying through his teeth, and has no roots.
I think Kennedy will give Rae a run for his money, and then win in overtime.
As a New Democrat, I'm very scared of Rae, Kennedy and Dion. The rest we can handle.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 11:10 pm (UTC)Also, it's a bunch of whiteys :).
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 03:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-10 11:46 pm (UTC)Donald Sutherland should be PM, and then give speeches on the inhumanity of torture in which he lambastes 24.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 04:07 pm (UTC)