Ladies and gentlemen, our PM!
Jul. 17th, 2006 12:27 pmOf course, Prime Minister Harper has swiftly moved to condemn the Israeli air strike that killed seven Canadians, including some children, on Sunday. And he's making every effort to evacuate the thousands of Canadians stranded in Lebanon.
Just kidding.
Just kidding.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 05:25 pm (UTC)I also heard a rumour that the Canadian embassy in Lebanon was closed yesterday. Because it was Sunday. I really hope that rumour was false. If there's ever a day when you really need to come in to work on your day off...
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:24 pm (UTC)Or to take another example, is that like the village where Israel warned the citizens to leave, and then when they did, Israel bombed the departing convoy?
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 05:38 pm (UTC)and no. it's really not. it's a case in which israel was under attack that was carefully planned for about seven years.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 06:46 pm (UTC)I'm always amazed when Israel demands that a government (either the PA or the Lebanese) take military action, and then starts bombing that government's military (référence libanaise, in effect preventing them from complying when they are driven to that point.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 06:50 pm (UTC)lebanon doesn't really *have* a military. it barely has a government.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 12:28 am (UTC)I understand that being attacked by terrorists is different than being attacked by a nation's armed forces. However, I think our PM's stance has more to do with national (er, US) interests and racism than with a recognition of this difference.
And yes, I am aware that on average over 90% of the casualties of modern warfare are civilians. This is precisely why war is not an appropriate response to a terrorist attack. There may be a moral difference between killing people on purpose and hitting "bystanders" by mistake, but there is no practical difference.
(The "mistake" argument is a stupid argument to make, anyway - of course there are people in populated areas! Killing bystanders is not a "mistake".)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 04:37 pm (UTC)and, fyi, the lebanese front is only southern lebanon and beirut, there are plenty of war-free areas.
are you aware that over a thousand rockets have been shot at israel since the fighting started? do you care? just today there were 70 rockets in one hour. these aren't the palestinians. this is not an enemy that can't afford to buy bread. it's an expensive, well-planned attack that has been in the works for about seven to ten years, backed up by iran. they have thousands of missiles in their stock, and no plans to stop shooting them.
the idf is working on getting all the foreign citizens back home. the problem is that canada has only little desire to get them back.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 01:58 am (UTC)Yes, I'm worried about who is dying on the Israeli side. I don't know why Israel went to war, knowing that Hizbollah could and would fight back with their rockets. It doesn't seem like it was a decision that was in the best interests of Israeli citizens, but perhaps you could explain it.
You keep bringing up the fact that in Lebanon, people in areas that are about to be bombed are warned in advance, that there are areas they could flee to, and that foreign nationals are being evacuated, as some kind of reason as to why war is not as bad as terrorism (or maybe more speifically why Israel's attacks aren't as bad as Hizbollah's?) This opinion is nonsense to me: if you're dead you're dead. It's of no practical difference whether you were intentionally killed or if it was a (so-called) mistake.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 01:40 am (UTC)i don't have know what really *would* put an end to hezbollah, but i don't think you or anyone else does either.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 09:36 am (UTC)um. i didn't claim i knew how to put an end to hezballah, you, however, seemed to have plenty of ideas how *not* to, so i was wondering if you know what israel actually should have done. do you think that just because no one has an answer, then no one should do anything about it?
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 03:05 am (UTC)it's a bit disturbing that you hold your national government to a lower standard than you hold a terrorist orgabization to.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 05:11 pm (UTC)But if they were killed by Israel they must have been bad people.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 05:36 pm (UTC)You can read the details here: http://www.lfpm.org/forum/showpost.php?p=314584&postcount=70
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 06:21 pm (UTC)Self-centered? Maybe. But we also want to avoid skirmishes between people coming from different political parties, and to bring to Canadians' attention that what PM Harper's response is extremely biased and unacceptable.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 06:28 pm (UTC)Bush On The Beeb
Date: 2006-07-17 09:51 pm (UTC)Re: Bush On The Beeb
Date: 2006-07-17 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 09:07 pm (UTC)I can't believe this kid's story made it to the front page of the <i>State News</i>, usually the <i>State News</i> relegates arabs to a column at the bottom of page 9C.