
Vaguely related photo of the day.
So let me get this straight. Woman goes to a bar with some friends. Drunken jerk gropes her. Woman restrains him, physically, while delivering a stern lecture about how he ought to treat women with a bit more respect. Woman's husband, who happens to be a Campbell Award-winning author with a really great blog, makes an amusing post about the incident.
Immediately, some readers want to know why Scalzi even allowed Mrs. Scalzi out of the house without a burqa and a male relative in the first place—and to a bar, no less! Dr. Helen thinks it's unfeminine. Libertarian gun nuts who wouldn't think twice about defending the right of a property owner to shoot some dude who trespassed on their land freak out over the idea that men may not have the unalienable right to touch any woman they encounter in public. People demand Krissy's arrest. Predictably, someone blames feminism and suggests that this sort of thing is the reason why the mail-order bride business is booming. Overwhelmingly, many people echo the sentiment that getting groped is a common "annoyance" for women who go to bars, which is why proper ladies shouldn't go to bars.
In case you think I'm exaggerating, here are some sample comments:
Several questions:
Did she ask him, politely or not, to leave her alone first before actually attacking him?
Why is it that everyone here seems to be turned on by belligerent, butch women?
Do you know any lawyers? Because if she actually hits someone who annoys here with a bat you're going to need one.
- K
Very classy. You married a woman who starts bar room brawls. You must be soooo proud.
Krissy committed a battery. It wasn't self defense and she's fortunate she wasn't arrested. Had she been, it sounds like she'd have fit in just fine in jail.
- Ming the Merciless Siamese Cat
...For example: there actually is a primary, main reason why men behave like that -- it is because in the past, women have rewarded them for it, with attention, affection, and intimacy.
So what would actually 'rock' now would be for Krissy and John, or any of most of the commenters here, to post acknowledging that, and do the nigh-unthinkable in today's culture: actually dare to criticize women for their particular behavioral irresponsibility; to point out that many women go in groups to drinking establishments specifically in order to hook up with men there, or at the very least get their egos stroked through interaction with the men there; and that the men there know it, and also know that very often a 'no' from the women there really just means 'try harder'...
- Acksiom
WRONG. Completely wrong.
What you're advocating is the same stupidity that afflicts the world over. There were numerous options available other than a violent response, and your proclamation that this was the right thing to do in the situation is completely out of line.
Quite simply, two wrongs don't make a right.
The only reason your wife doesn't deserve to be beaten with an ugly stick is because God already beat us to the job.
Your wife might think she's a hard a$$, but she's nowhere near it. She was lucky the dude was just a drunken buffoon. I recommend against perpetuating your misconception.
Next time, I hope the guy has a gun.
- Anonymous
...While my daughters do go to bars with friends, they don't go to bars and get into brawls with other drunks.
If they did, I'd expect their husbands/boyfriends to watch out for them somehow -- not cheer them on!
I know you, like Emily [a poster who defended Krissy's actions], wish it were a world in which a woman can go anywhere and do anything a man can. But it ain't.
- pipe
And my personal favourite:
The picture is mis-captioned. It should read:
This is an American Woman.
Seen the marriage statistics lately?
No wonder the foreign-bride businesses are booming. What man in possession of his own mind would want that?
- Baron Waste, who goes on to provide such gems as...
There is for the Mexicana a difference of centrality. Her focus is on her home, her man, and her children. She sees her job as a way to support her family instead of, as happens northward, the other way around. Her home is more important to her than her office. Making partner at Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe is not her reason for living...
Now, young and beautiful has its charm. Men do not, as a rule, seek out the aged. But—and I know many of these men well—what draws them is the warmth and womanliness of the Mexicana. In Mexico you don’t marry one of the guys. You don’t marry a child-support bomb waiting to explode without visitation. You don’t marry a hundred pounds of irrational anger looking for an excuse. You marry a woman. The difference... my God, the difference...
... Ukrainian women seem to simply appreciate and respect men more. Not in a subservient way, but as a complement to a man. That is the sincere desire for most of them. American women pre-feminism were like this and also never as subservient as the media likes to portray them today. Most were very happy being wives and mothers until that route became demonized by the intelligentsia. They were told they were unhappy and became that way.
Scalzi's response, both in various comments and in his follow-up post, is kinder than mine would be, considering the number of people suddenly jumping on the "violence is wrong" bandwagon (but I suspect they wouldn't be so quick to assume that the violence of the American government against Iraq is wrong, or the violence of a cop shooting a suspect is wrong) and suggesting that his wife should be beaten, shot, or thrown in prison.
As usual, Amanda Marcotte has some good commentary.
To sum up, we've learned the following:
• Male violence against women is common, and therefore acceptable.
• Should a woman retaliate, even if no harm is done, she is anything from immature to criminal.
• If a man touches a woman's breasts, it isn't violent. If a woman touches a man's throat with her elbow, she ought to be locked up for the good of society.
• Ignore the potential rapist and he'll go away. Except for when he doesn't. But anyway, if he does, it's your fault for putting on shoes and leaving the kitchen.
• Foreign women are better because they're submissive and appreciative of men.
It always a wonder to see how anonymous forums allow so many men to be so open with their misogyny. I wonder how many decent-seeming men I encounter in my daily life secretly feel this way.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 05:09 pm (UTC)Ugh! What? What the FUCK!? WHAT?!
In light of my own experiences with friends who have gotten groped, I would suggest that this person would benefit from talking to more women. But that's really not true. What this person really needs is a swift one to the family jewels.
The comments about Mexican and Ukrainian women are actually kind of funny. In the same way the Nazi UFO theory and IDF time machines are kind of funny.
But mostly this makes me mind-bendingly angry.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 05:18 pm (UTC)Yesterday, a friend told me that she was going to start posting personal ads again. She'd initially started with "single Asian female," which is an accurate, if cliché, description. I had to warn her against that because I know she'll get flooded with white boys who fetishize "foreign" women and will probably get all belligerent when they discover that she's actually not a submissive little lotus blossom. I wish she didn't have to worry about that. It's hard enough to meet a decent fellow.
I also wish I haven't had to defend my boobs from men who assumed that they were public property since I was nine years old. I should have taken up kickboxing as soon as I hit puberty, and if I ever have a daughter, I'm going to make sure that she does.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 05:44 pm (UTC)This is one of those situations that are so blatantly wrong, and the responses to it so extraordinarily stupid and assanine, that I am left speechless, just absolutely flabbergasted with anger, that I cannot think or speak, or make a reasoned response. The stupidity, arrogance, and narrowmindedness of the men (and women [!!!]) who have responded to this incident, and called for the punishment or death of this woman for daring to defend herself, makes me wish that terrorists would get a dirty bomb and take out a major urban area.
Has it gotten so bad in this country that this many people think it is acceptable to treat another human being in this manner? Or, has it always been this bad? It just sickens me, really.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 05:52 pm (UTC)But, you know, we invade various Middle Eastern countries to protect the womenfolk. Etc.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 05:47 pm (UTC)You'd think those libertarians would be pleased that this woman didn't rely on the Nanny State to help her. I mean, what if the guy groping her was statistically undesirable?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 05:57 pm (UTC)Hahaha.
Men feel entitled to grope women, and they do it in a bubble of relative safety. Every time that one tries and gets kicked in the balls for his effort, it makes other men think twice. This is why I think even "disproportionate" responses to sexual harassment are justifiable; it's a defense against a culture of entitlement that treats women's bodies as objects of men's control.
I'm turning into such a little rad-fem. Oh my.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 06:36 pm (UTC)...Over here via cdaae, btw, nice article sabotabby...
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 06:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:I now VOW to read John Scalzi
Date: 2006-09-12 07:01 pm (UTC)Re: I now VOW to read John Scalzi
Date: 2006-09-12 07:04 pm (UTC)Re: I now VOW to read John Scalzi
From:Re: I now VOW to read John Scalzi
From:Re: I now VOW to read John Scalzi
From:Re: I now VOW to read John Scalzi
Date: 2006-09-12 09:34 pm (UTC)Re: I now VOW to read John Scalzi
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 07:25 pm (UTC)Gross! It's the same argument people use to justify date rape!
And not that I believe any women are actually like this, but assuming that there are any women who actually flirt like the way he described, I have a huge beef. After all the bullshit I hear from men about being "confused" about "no meaning yes" and all that other tripe, you would think they would try to stick with women who were honest and straightforward: women whose yes's mean yes, and whose no's mean no. I know women like that exist because I am one!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 07:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 07:29 pm (UTC)What if!?!?!?!?!!!!!! AND !!!!1ONE!!!!!?????
Because there's nothing boorish about grabbing people in bars after being told to back off. Nothing at all. And there's nothing misogynistic about targetting women when you do your grabbing.
Some of the commenters there seem to think that it only counts as misogyny if someone is saying "I hates me some wimminfolk," while targetting women to rape and murder. Simply targetting them as objects of drunken boorishness is somehow normal.
God bugger a goat but the sheer number of clueless patriarchal troglodytic asshats out there is astounding.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 07:37 pm (UTC)Don't you know that it only counts as assault if someone gets charged by the cops? Otherwise, it's just boys being boys.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 08:31 pm (UTC)That's my first brush with Instapundit, I have to say. I've deliberately avoided ever reading him. And I have to say the name is apt - opinions served up in about a second, without anything wholesome, nourishing, or substantive in them!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 08:33 pm (UTC)fucking A.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 08:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 10:22 pm (UTC)A few years ago I had a similar thing happen at a show. It was sort of in the pit and everyone was squished together. Some drunk asshole thought it was a good excuse to grope me. I gently tried to push him off at first, and the nice young man with pink hair next to me offered to burn him with his cigarette, but I finally opted to throwing him off, and an elbow was involved. It ended up a little worse unfortunately than Scalzi's story. And, he didn't apologize...
no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 11:57 pm (UTC)Gah. Plenty of men manage to get shitfaced and not grope women. Drinking is no excuse. Pits are actually no excuse—I've been in plenty, and never been treated with anything other than respect. Of course, they were all Canadian pits, so you had six-foot-tall punks bashing into each other and then muttering, "Sorry!"
But I digress.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:03 am (UTC)And realistically, she probably wasn't in that much danger. By her account, she was with friends and she was in a bar. And in my experience, most asshats aren't really expecting someone to respond, which is why they resort to groping in the first place. So her assessment of the situation was good.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-12 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Off Topic
Date: 2006-09-12 10:59 pm (UTC)Re: Off Topic
Date: 2006-09-13 12:05 am (UTC)I need an icon for Godwin posts and/or dropping the H-Bomb.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 01:14 am (UTC)Wonder No More
Date: 2006-09-13 04:24 am (UTC)It's all of us, honey. Every single, god damned, cock-ridden, testosterone-junky, a-verbal one of us Every single time you turn your back on us we're plotting our next grope and blaming it on the cut of track-pants.
That, or there a relatively small number of bigotted trolls out there with a relatively large amount of time on their hands.
Considering the amount of damage I've seen left-wing trolls do to discussions, I can imagine the right-wing sub-species could do substantially more. Their progenitures dominate American "Talk Radio" and a hell of a lot of television "news" time, so a lot of empty heads gravitate towards that view-point, when 20 years ago that same person might have become a member of the CPC(ML). And they're richer than left-wingers, so they have more time on their hands.
(Going to go to sleep very shortly.)
Re: Wonder No More
Date: 2006-09-13 04:24 am (UTC)Re: Wonder No More
From:*twitch*
Date: 2006-09-13 07:40 am (UTC)Women, too- I've met some of them. And they are not nice. (Think catty, backstabbing, gossiping bitches, please). Ugh.
I knew I was a recluse for a reason. *wry grins*
*hugs*
Anj
Re: *twitch*
Date: 2006-09-13 01:48 pm (UTC)ohmygawd...
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-14 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-14 05:26 pm (UTC)