Stupidwatch 2007
Jan. 26th, 2007 12:52 pmToday's run-down of total idiocy:
Cops are spending your tax dollars to crack down on khat.
Why it's stupid: Khat is basically like caffeine, in terms of effect and addictiveness. It's legal in most countries, and the only reason why it was banned here is because the state needed yet another excuse to persecute the Somali community.
Set phasers on "OMG OMG HOLY FUCK I'M BURNING TO DEATH!"
Why it's stupid: "Non-lethal" weapons are not a substitute for lethal weapons. In a life-or-death situation, you don't fuck around; you shoot to kill. "Non-lethal" weapons are used to increase the level of sadistic force in situations where cops or soldiers are not at risk of death: crowd control, strikes, arresting unarmed homeless people, and probably, busting Somalis for growing khat.
Ontario Finance Minister says that the government can't afford to raise minimum wage to $10/h.
Why it's stupid: Sure it can. It just doesn't want to.
Ontario's government thinks that it can embarrass deadbeat parents into paying child support by posting their pictures online.
Why it's stupid: a) Who reads government websites? Besides me? b) How about, like, a national strategy, so like, deadbeat parents don't just move to another province like my father did?
The Conservative chair of the aboriginal affairs committee replies to controversy over his racist comments with "some of my best friends are..."
Why it's stupid: Let's face it. Everything having to do with the Conservative government is stupid.
Tom Waits wins suit against car manufacturer for imitating his voice in an ad; will donate the money to charity.
Why it's stupid: As if Tom Waits would sell out enough to do car ads. Who did they think they were fooling?
Cops are spending your tax dollars to crack down on khat.
Why it's stupid: Khat is basically like caffeine, in terms of effect and addictiveness. It's legal in most countries, and the only reason why it was banned here is because the state needed yet another excuse to persecute the Somali community.
Set phasers on "OMG OMG HOLY FUCK I'M BURNING TO DEATH!"
Why it's stupid: "Non-lethal" weapons are not a substitute for lethal weapons. In a life-or-death situation, you don't fuck around; you shoot to kill. "Non-lethal" weapons are used to increase the level of sadistic force in situations where cops or soldiers are not at risk of death: crowd control, strikes, arresting unarmed homeless people, and probably, busting Somalis for growing khat.
Ontario Finance Minister says that the government can't afford to raise minimum wage to $10/h.
Why it's stupid: Sure it can. It just doesn't want to.
Ontario's government thinks that it can embarrass deadbeat parents into paying child support by posting their pictures online.
Why it's stupid: a) Who reads government websites? Besides me? b) How about, like, a national strategy, so like, deadbeat parents don't just move to another province like my father did?
The Conservative chair of the aboriginal affairs committee replies to controversy over his racist comments with "some of my best friends are..."
Why it's stupid: Let's face it. Everything having to do with the Conservative government is stupid.
Tom Waits wins suit against car manufacturer for imitating his voice in an ad; will donate the money to charity.
Why it's stupid: As if Tom Waits would sell out enough to do car ads. Who did they think they were fooling?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:21 pm (UTC)For a concrete example, Dick Cheney's daughter is an out lesbian. Lesbianism, as far as we can tell, isn't contagious, and she hasn't spread teh ghey to him. Regardless of whether he has no lesbians in the family, one lesbian in the family, or every one of his family members is a lesbian, his government's policies are objectively anti-gay.
Similarly, a white dude with a ton of friends who are people of colour can still be racist, or so blind to his own privileges that his words and actions are racist even if he himself doesn't see it. Perhaps he's more likely to be sensitive to racism than someone whose friends are all white, but that really depends on how much of a clueless moron he is, and whether his friends are willing to call him on his privilege.
Also, is there any good way for a public figure to defend themselves from such an allegation?
Sure. Instead of going immediately on the defensive, he could examine what he said and wrote and actually listen to the criticisms that people make. And then apologize.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:17 pm (UTC)examine what he said and wrote and actually listen to the criticisms that people make
How reasonable is such a course for a public figure? For a president, minister, or senator to have to endure a week (or even 12 hours, given the way television and the Internet work) of headlines that read '[Name] seriously contemplating possibility s/he is a racist' could well mean political suicide, even if the allegation was blatantly false. An immediate response and explanation is necessary.
Addendum
Date: 2007-01-26 07:23 pm (UTC)Re: Addendum
Date: 2007-01-26 07:36 pm (UTC)There's also the possibility that if some of my best friends are black, I can still have racist attitudes about First Nations people.
I think a lot of the problem is the way we (in the West) conceptualize and talk about racism—as though racism (defined as "prejudice" or "bigotry," rather than as a system with deep roots that affects absolutely everyone) is something that is either on or off. The defense, when one has made a racist comment, is not "but I'm not a racist!" Someone who has spent a lifetime analyzing white privilege, deconstructing her own attitudes, and actively fighting racism is still capable of making a racist comment. That doesn't make her an irredeemable cross-burning KKK member; it means that she has issues that she needs to address.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-27 12:48 am (UTC)>>>>> It's fuuny you mention this because he just went off on Wolf Blitzer when he ask him about his daughter having a kid and the Family Rescearch Coucil (U.S. christian bigot organization) denoucing her for it. He says that it's invading his family's privacy asking about it.
But I don't think that's true bcause
1. She's an out lesbian
2. She has done paid work on his campaign, the whitehouse and the republican party.
3. When you fuck with peoples families with pushing things like anti-gay marriage amendments, I don't don't feel real guilty about dragging thier families in to it, especially when the family member in question is active in politics herself.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-27 02:17 am (UTC)As is, she's a fair target for discussion, and Darth Cheney's hypocrisy when it comes to believing in one set of rules for his daughter and another for every other queer person in the country needs to be brought up as often as possible.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:43 pm (UTC)But my ears have a liberal slant.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:20 pm (UTC)However, that doesn't mean that the person speaking always intends for there to be a 'but,' or is racist.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:40 pm (UTC)But still, at best, the line reads like when my mother would say, "I worked with a lesbian once and she was so nice -- she NEVER hit on me!" I mean, my Mom didn't intend to offend, that was probably the closest thing she could give to a compliment for a person whose sexual orientation made her nervous, but I still cringed at it.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:50 pm (UTC)Fritos taste innocent when you dream.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:46 pm (UTC)They should send me there.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 09:44 pm (UTC)Reminds me of a study I read about using ketamine for people with long-term, treatment resistent depression, which mentioned that a "possible side-effect" was euphoria.
Oh noes, not euphoria!!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:03 pm (UTC)This has happened so many times now, I can't believe advertisers still think they can get away with it! This is at least the 4th time he has sued over such issues. Got Tom!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 08:22 pm (UTC)Erm. Already got one?
Date: 2007-01-26 08:25 pm (UTC)Re: Erm. Already got one?
Date: 2007-01-26 09:03 pm (UTC)Re: Erm. Already got one?
Date: 2007-01-26 09:06 pm (UTC)Also, I don't come up with marketing ideas or anything. I just make designs.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-26 09:13 pm (UTC)some of my best friends are ...
Date: 2007-01-26 10:33 pm (UTC)1. It is not possible to deny racism without sounding racist. No matter what you say, it sounds like a stupid defense.
2. If someone of a different race than you finds what you said racist, even if you were unaware of any racist content, apologize for your ignorance, if for nothing else. Saying anything in your own defense will sound bad. [See item 1 above.] Also, you are probably not in a very good position to judge. Your own perception of what is racist is conditioned by what happens to _you_, not what happens to someone of that other race. I am European-American, and I know that if I walk down a street with an African-American, they will see many more instances of racism than I will. I'm not sensitized to it in the same way.
Re: some of my best friends are ...
Date: 2007-01-27 02:23 am (UTC)Responding with a defense that's so common it has whole websites devoted to it is even worse.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 04:57 pm (UTC)PS, I'm kind of glad they won't raise the minimum wage more than 8$. I think there are welfare programs that could increase the income of the working poor more efficiently. When it comes to minimum wage laws I get the image of some teenager being able to buy his new ipod much faster. Maybe I'm wrong on this, but besides, 10$ minimum wage is still not enough to pay rent and raise a family, thats what I'm making now and I can't imagine a family being able to live on that income, neither single parents or two earners. Actually, wouldn't it be just enough that they wouldn't be able to qualify for welfare benefits anymore?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-29 02:56 pm (UTC)A lot of people work for minimum wage besides teenagers. I'm amazed at how some people I know are able to survive—you have to pretty much live in a crap area and pray nothing happens to your teeth. There should be some supplement so that if you're surviving on that little, you qualify for some welfare benefits.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-30 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 10:35 pm (UTC)Of course, the real reason for doing so is to draw attention to
Speaking of
no subject
Date: 2007-01-29 03:18 pm (UTC)*dies*
People keep on recommending World War Z to me, but no, haven't seen it.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-29 08:37 pm (UTC)The smaller the cock, the bigger the batmobile.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-29 12:58 am (UTC)Looks like its banned in most of Europe except the UK.
'Smuggling of the plant known as Qhat (khat) is the main reason British nationals require consular assistance in Canada.'
Opps.
Definitely sounds like something interesting although I'm wondering
about this psychosis part. My hub described for me someone on it when he was in Yemen, and it sounded freaky like acid.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-29 03:20 pm (UTC)