sabotabby: (books!)
[personal profile] sabotabby
Here you have the catchword around which has long circled a debate familiar to you. Its familiarity tells you how unfruitful it has been, for it has not advanced beyond the monotonous reiteration of arguments for and against: on the one hand, the correct political line is demanded of the poet; on the other, one is justified in expecting his work to have quality. Such a formulation is of course unsatisfactory as long as the connection between the two factors, political line and quality, has not been perceived. Of course, the connection can be asserted dogmatically. You can declare: a work that shows the correct political tendency need show no other quality. You can also declare: a work that exhibits the correct tendency must of necessity have every other quality.

This second formulation is not uninteresting, and, moreover, it is correct. I adopt it as my own. But in doing so I abstain from asserting it dogmatically. It must be proved.


(Bad political folksingers, I'm looking at you.)

I was wondering today what Benjamin's and Brecht's friendship must have been like. It's not that I imagine Brecht as more of a hardass (though he probably was), but there's a certain touching optimism that I see in Benjamin's work that makes me think that he must have argued a lot with the sort of personality who wrote something like "What Keeps Mankind Alive?" I really wish I had a time machine, though it probably still wouldn't help as I don't speak German.

Also, Benjamin's adorable fanboying writing about Karl Kraus makes me now want to read Karl Kraus. Have any of you read him?

Date: 2008-10-30 01:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shelestel.livejournal.com
*Sigh* And what was his proof, so that we can decons argue with it?

Date: 2008-10-30 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shelestel.livejournal.com
Haha. What a talented (and naive?) use of logic! The formulation you quote in the text though has given rise to many idiotic an interpretation, while "if it isn't good art then it isn't the right politics" sounds much better.
Probably has to do with how we perceive politicians (dirty) vs. how we perceive the art world (sublime).

Date: 2008-10-30 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jk-fabiani.livejournal.com
I have to write a chorus
and sing it
like clockwork
power to the people!

Date: 2008-10-30 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] culpster.livejournal.com
cf: "Brecht In Exile" by Bruce Cook. I think I purged my copy in a neurotic fit, but it has some material on Brecht and Benjamin's relationship I believe.

Also asks the musical question which also occupies Williams: how does Life of Galileo end up being both his best work (by their estimation), and the least 'rigorous' by Brecht's rhetorical standards?

I'm no Brecht scholar, but I agree with the old fogeys that "Food is the first thing/morals follow on" is a conception that it is quite possible to dissent from :)

I assume you know/own the Tom Waits version? It's on the "Lost In the Stars" comp.

Date: 2008-10-30 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] culpster.livejournal.com
PS - Apparently Weill couldn't stand the guy.

Date: 2008-10-31 01:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] culpster.livejournal.com
No intelligence re The Measures Taken.

And now I must ask: precisely WHICH footsoldier from the army of insipid activist folkies are you sniping at? ;)

Date: 2008-10-31 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] culpster.livejournal.com
It just sounded like you were running screaming from one in that moment.

Let "god" sort em out.

Date: 2008-10-30 05:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com
Still totally best dead depresso East European philosopher boyfriend ever.

Date: 2008-10-30 06:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rohmie.livejournal.com
Cute With Chris is live in Toronto tonight. (I just found out myself.)

He's also reading stories this Sunday, Nov 2nd at 2:00 PM.

Date: 2008-10-30 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seanmonster.livejournal.com
Did somebody say political folksingers?

Date: 2008-10-30 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dobrovolets.livejournal.com
I don't think Brecht and Benjamin would argue so much as Benjamin would say something silly, and Brecht would sneer. (I guess you can tell where I would tend to fall.)

Kraus was a good aphorist, though very culturally specific. Attempts to translate his work from German have been sporadic, and failures.

Date: 2008-10-30 01:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rrrao.livejournal.com

Gahh... I took a grad seminar on Benjamin, but it has left me precious little off the top of my head to contribute in the way of casting some speculative light on what their relationship would've been like, apart from stuff you probably already know - Adorno didn't like Brecht's coarse Marxism, and worried that it would dull Benjamin's delicate and refined, rarified theoretical musings.

I remember reading that Benjamin stayed in a little guesthouse or room at Brecht's place in Denmark (I suppose sometime in the early 30s, in exile from the Nazis), and they would drink red wine and have animated conversations and get on fabulously. I suppose that was what Adorno was jealous of, but he was a dour, sour old man...

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

May 2026

S M T W T F S
      1 2
345 6 7 8 9
10 1112 13 14 1516
1718 19 2021 2223
24252627282930
31      

Style Credit

Page generated May. 22nd, 2026 02:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags