It's too late for me to weigh in, even if I wanted to, and really, I don't want to beyond what I've left in comments in other people's LJs.
However. I am trying to pick up the Novel Of Doom again*. Not that I envision becoming a famous bestselling author or anything like that, but I have books in me that shall, I hope, one day come out. Not to mention what must be at least several books worth of blogulation—I do seem to write an awful lot of stuff.
All of this is to say, dear friends, that if at any time it appears that I'm not wearing pants, I'd much rather know than not. You'd tell me, right?
* I mean, seriously. It is halfway done, at least. I know how it ends. I also pretty much know what happens in the middle, and my only excuse for not having finished it a year ago is that I haven't been in the correct frame of mind to write it.
However. I am trying to pick up the Novel Of Doom again*. Not that I envision becoming a famous bestselling author or anything like that, but I have books in me that shall, I hope, one day come out. Not to mention what must be at least several books worth of blogulation—I do seem to write an awful lot of stuff.
All of this is to say, dear friends, that if at any time it appears that I'm not wearing pants, I'd much rather know than not. You'd tell me, right?
* I mean, seriously. It is halfway done, at least. I know how it ends. I also pretty much know what happens in the middle, and my only excuse for not having finished it a year ago is that I haven't been in the correct frame of mind to write it.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 03:54 pm (UTC)*terrorist fist jabs*
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 03:53 pm (UTC)This go-round has been quite instructive for me because so much of it has been happening in geek sections of the community, where I thought it was generally accepted that if someone is Being Wrong, to point out the error is to do them a favour. I've lost count of how many times I've seen people vaunting that as one of the ways in which geek culture is superior to the mainstream. But apparently my copy of that memo was missing the rider that said "unless the Wrongness is related to race or some other privilege they don't want to examine."
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 04:02 pm (UTC)One of the reasons, geeky as I am, that I don't hang around many full-blown geeks (I mean, most of my friends are geeky, but there's geeky and there's Geek, if you know what I mean) is that I can't stand the conversation-as-correction thing, where you have:
Geek 1: [random obscure fact of trivia]
Geek 2: Well, actually [correction]
It just drives me up the wall. It's never a proper debate; just people showing off how smart they are, for a value of smart that, nine times out of ten, is completely irrelevant and boring.
But even given that, there's a glaring hypocrisy because not one of the people involved would have been this horrifically offended if someone had pointed out that the physics behind the FTL travel they used in their latest novel wouldn't actually work.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:20 pm (UTC)But I digress.
Your last paragraph is 100% true.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:24 pm (UTC)There's a whole lot of other stuff going on as well, of course.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:13 pm (UTC)Oh SO WELL PUT. -- And then there are people, like
sigh.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 06:42 pm (UTC)Woman: "I really like my new iPhone!"
Man, Geek: "But they're dangerous! Did you hear about (some obscure identity-theft thing you can do with the iPhone)?"
Woman, looking embarrassed at being caught out: "... Well ..."
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:27 pm (UTC)It's such a sado-masochistic ritual. It's really quite funny, in a sort of sick, teeth-on-edge way.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:11 pm (UTC)Geek 2: Well, actually [correction]
I do that only with grammar and spelling, but all the time....it's a weakness, it's an illness, my mum didn't love me!
//slinks off
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:00 pm (UTC)The thing is, the Wrongness of racist writing isn't comparable to the Wrongness of, say, specs for a railgun, or orbital mechanics, or what issue of Batman had him in a blue thong. People in general, not just geeks, often either shy away from comparing subjective truths which depend on context and perspective, or adopt extreme, caricatured positions and stick to them unyieldingly. A lack of objective standards means that to tell people they are Being Wrong on how not to be racist (without being able to point to a society which is not racist) is a much different proposition than telling them how to dress in period 17th century Lithuanian clothing. It's not impossible, of course, as proven by the many great posts I tracked down yesterday (though there were also terrible ones), but it's different. Second, it would be often wrong to assume that the white people in sci fi/fantasy are actually written as people. I think much of the genre's shallower pool sees all the characters as plot devices. If the token POC character is a cardboard caricature, but so is every other character (except, perhaps, the Marysue at the centre), all of them only there to propel narration along the magical devices or Klingons, where does one even start to complain?
(How did this whole thing get titled "Cultural Appropriation" anyway? "Representation of Race" != "cultural appropriation" *confused*)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:13 pm (UTC)or what issue of Batman had him in a blue thong.
Pics or it never happened.
If the token POC character is a cardboard caricature, but so is every other character (except, perhaps, the Marysue at the centre), all of them only there to propel narration along the magical devices or Klingons, where does one even start to complain?
I don't think it's a problem if that's the case. I mean, it's a problem, but one of poor writing rather than white privilege. What is the white equivalent of the Magical Negro or the Inscrutable Asian Villain, though?
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:35 pm (UTC)For that, we have to look at which groups of white people have a history of oppression and marginalization:
The tropes are there, and are damaging.
I think the current Snargle is more accurately characterized as being about Racial Stereotypes; however, because one of the sparks that lit the tinder was
Or something.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:56 pm (UTC)Duh, the Howard Roark prototype: the Lonely, Unyielding, Sexy, Misunderstood Genius God-King with Aspergers! :)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:41 pm (UTC)This round of the inevitable conflict was quite depressing, because it is now exhibit A that White Liberals Don't Get It, Refuse To Get It, and Will Believe in Martian Foil-Hat Deconstructionist Conspiracies Rather Than Attempt to Get It. Occam's Razor could have solved this on the first day, but the entrenched racism of the white liberal is defended with all the armadas and projectiles that unreason has at its command.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:09 pm (UTC)I love the way you put things.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:11 pm (UTC)Novel of Doom YAY. I would love to read all the books in you that are busting to come out.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-28 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 11:57 am (UTC)Good luck with your Novel of Doom.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 02:46 pm (UTC)And thanks!
no subject
Date: 2009-01-30 12:46 am (UTC)