sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
[personal profile] sabotabby
It's too late for me to weigh in, even if I wanted to, and really, I don't want to beyond what I've left in comments in other people's LJs.

However. I am trying to pick up the Novel Of Doom again*. Not that I envision becoming a famous bestselling author or anything like that, but I have books in me that shall, I hope, one day come out. Not to mention what must be at least several books worth of blogulation—I do seem to write an awful lot of stuff.

All of this is to say, dear friends, that if at any time it appears that I'm not wearing pants, I'd much rather know than not. You'd tell me, right?

* I mean, seriously. It is halfway done, at least. I know how it ends. I also pretty much know what happens in the middle, and my only excuse for not having finished it a year ago is that I haven't been in the correct frame of mind to write it.

Date: 2009-01-28 03:45 pm (UTC)
ext_28663: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bcholmes.livejournal.com
I promise to call you on any racist shit that I, as a marginally-trained white person, can spot if you'll do likewise.
Edited Date: 2009-01-28 03:45 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-01-28 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizw.livejournal.com
Yes, I would, because if it was me, I'd also much rather know.

This go-round has been quite instructive for me because so much of it has been happening in geek sections of the community, where I thought it was generally accepted that if someone is Being Wrong, to point out the error is to do them a favour. I've lost count of how many times I've seen people vaunting that as one of the ways in which geek culture is superior to the mainstream. But apparently my copy of that memo was missing the rider that said "unless the Wrongness is related to race or some other privilege they don't want to examine."

Date: 2009-01-28 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seaya.livejournal.com
You know when I've made that sort of correction it wasn't to show off, it was to make sure the other person wasn't under false impressions and they stopped spreading them. Usually when the person I'm correcting has a habit of going on about how smart they are and spreading misconceptions. Like the time that [redacted] was going on about the history of hip hop and saying many false things and showing off.

But I digress.

Your last paragraph is 100% true.

Date: 2009-01-28 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zingerella.livejournal.com
I think part of the reason that some people are taking this particular round of correction so badly is that we're not dealing with facts, here. We're dealing with readings of texts, something at which they'd considered themselves pretty durned good; empathy which, People Who Have Been Hurt, they think they shouldn't need any schooling; and communicating, which, as writers, many of them think they've had all the validation that should count. These are squishy, subjective things, rather than hard facts, and so they can't quite wrap their brains around how their opinions aren't as valid as other people's.


There's a whole lot of other stuff going on as well, of course.

Date: 2009-01-28 09:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com
We're dealing with readings of texts, something at which they'd considered themselves pretty durned good; empathy which, People Who Have Been Hurt, they think they shouldn't need any schooling; and communicating, which, as writers, many of them think they've had all the validation that should count.

Oh SO WELL PUT. -- And then there are people, like [livejournal.com profile] willshetterly, who think they have already paid their But I'm Not a Racist! dues in full and so refuse to think they could exhibit any kind of racist behaviour or bear any kind of unexamined racist prejudice in their psyches ever. Ever.

sigh.

Date: 2009-01-28 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] springheel-jack.livejournal.com
Geeks do that so much not because they think it's geek-acceptable but because they know geeks hate it even more than norms. It's an aggressive gesture in norm discourse but even more so in geek. Geeks are mean.

Date: 2009-01-28 06:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joxn.livejournal.com
Geeks will even do this when no objective error of fact is involved. I observed the following (approximate) conversation at a party recently.
Woman: "I really like my new iPhone!"
Man, Geek: "But they're dangerous! Did you hear about (some obscure identity-theft thing you can do with the iPhone)?"
Woman, looking embarrassed at being caught out: "... Well ..."
[livejournal.com profile] joxn, to self: "Fuck this noise, I'm going to go hang out with people who don't make one another randomly feel bad about themselves."
Edited Date: 2009-01-28 06:42 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-01-28 09:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] springheel-jack.livejournal.com
Model of academia. Academics hate to be criticized or even disagreed-with, yet they have to subject themselves to it at papers and panels all the time. They pretend it's collegial and then always, always go back to their offices and blow up about it to their favorite grad students.

It's such a sado-masochistic ritual. It's really quite funny, in a sort of sick, teeth-on-edge way.

Date: 2009-01-28 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] revolution-grrl.livejournal.com
That and what the hell else are we going to do with all this awesome knowledge inside?? Let it siiiing out!

Date: 2009-01-28 09:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com
Geek 1: [random obscure fact of trivia]
Geek 2: Well, actually [correction]


I do that only with grammar and spelling, but all the time....it's a weakness, it's an illness, my mum didn't love me!

//slinks off

Date: 2009-01-28 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cucumberseed.livejournal.com
I take it another way; the fact that these conversations come up at all is potentially positive, despite all the defensiveness that follows. That said, I am deliberately Pollyannaing this go round, because, yeah, it's not a lot different than the last go-round. Maybe my hope is misplaced.

Date: 2009-01-28 04:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cucumberseed.livejournal.com
I'll call you on anything fail I see, if you call me on the same.

Date: 2009-01-28 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caprinus.livejournal.com
I hadn't even clued in there was some greater shitstorm going on until yesterday! I saw a few people on ye olde flist making posts about racism and SF, but I didn't put two and two together, I thought it was just random synchronicity. Ooops.

The thing is, the Wrongness of racist writing isn't comparable to the Wrongness of, say, specs for a railgun, or orbital mechanics, or what issue of Batman had him in a blue thong. People in general, not just geeks, often either shy away from comparing subjective truths which depend on context and perspective, or adopt extreme, caricatured positions and stick to them unyieldingly. A lack of objective standards means that to tell people they are Being Wrong on how not to be racist (without being able to point to a society which is not racist) is a much different proposition than telling them how to dress in period 17th century Lithuanian clothing. It's not impossible, of course, as proven by the many great posts I tracked down yesterday (though there were also terrible ones), but it's different. Second, it would be often wrong to assume that the white people in sci fi/fantasy are actually written as people. I think much of the genre's shallower pool sees all the characters as plot devices. If the token POC character is a cardboard caricature, but so is every other character (except, perhaps, the Marysue at the centre), all of them only there to propel narration along the magical devices or Klingons, where does one even start to complain?

(How did this whole thing get titled "Cultural Appropriation" anyway? "Representation of Race" != "cultural appropriation" *confused*)

Date: 2009-01-28 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seaya.livejournal.com
This is because one stream of the early conversation was a conversation on cultural appropriation in Jay Lake's journal which got rolled into discussion of representation in general.

Date: 2009-01-28 05:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zingerella.livejournal.com
What is the white equivalent of the Magical Negro or the Inscrutable Asian Villain, though

For that, we have to look at which groups of white people have a history of oppression and marginalization:

  • The Funny Fat Dude

  • The Shrill Fat Stupid Woman

  • The Dead Lesbian

  • The Tragic Dead Gay Man

  • The Insatiable, Perverted Bisexual/Transperson

  • The Bad Girl Who Inevitably Has Something Bad Happen to Her Because She Had Sex



  • The tropes are there, and are damaging.

    I think the current Snargle is more accurately characterized as being about Racial Stereotypes; however, because one of the sparks that lit the tinder was [livejournal.com profile] matociquala's post on de-Othering the Other, there was some feeling that she (a white woman) was speaking for PoC, when her own efforts in representation of the Other have been less than perfect successes, which got conflated with appropriation.

    Or something.

    Date: 2009-01-28 05:56 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] caprinus.livejournal.com
    What is the white equivalent of the Magical Negro or the Inscrutable Asian Villain, though?

    Duh, the Howard Roark prototype: the Lonely, Unyielding, Sexy, Misunderstood Genius God-King with Aspergers! :)

    Date: 2009-01-28 05:41 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] springheel-jack.livejournal.com
    Fratricidal conflict like this is rather to be expected, especially when there's a sub-group who are getting consistently kicked in the teeth, and are seething about it for ages and ages, and then one of the people they thought was on their side shows up for work in teeth-kickin' boots. The reaction can only be ET TU.

    This round of the inevitable conflict was quite depressing, because it is now exhibit A that White Liberals Don't Get It, Refuse To Get It, and Will Believe in Martian Foil-Hat Deconstructionist Conspiracies Rather Than Attempt to Get It. Occam's Razor could have solved this on the first day, but the entrenched racism of the white liberal is defended with all the armadas and projectiles that unreason has at its command.

    Date: 2009-01-28 09:09 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com
    This round of the inevitable conflict was quite depressing, because it is now exhibit A that White Liberals Don't Get It, Refuse To Get It, and Will Believe in Martian Foil-Hat Deconstructionist Conspiracies Rather Than Attempt to Get It. Occam's Razor could have solved this on the first day, but the entrenched racism of the white liberal is defended with all the armadas and projectiles that unreason has at its command.

    I love the way you put things.

    Date: 2009-01-28 09:11 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com
    I will TOTALLY do you that solid, my friend, assuming (ha ha) I can tell when _I_ am not wearing pants myself, ACK.

    Novel of Doom YAY. I would love to read all the books in you that are busting to come out.

    Date: 2009-01-28 09:30 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com
    ....OMG YES PLZ. (Wait, my stupid gmail addy has my IRL name in it -- can you tell me your email first? Or is there an @livejournal email for you? I had to disable mine.)

    Date: 2009-01-28 09:56 pm (UTC)

    Date: 2009-01-28 10:54 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] faithhopetricks.livejournal.com
    Well crap! Did it not work?

    Date: 2009-01-29 04:46 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] 5-miles.livejournal.com
    me too! me too! I want to read it.

    Date: 2009-01-29 05:02 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] 5-miles.livejournal.com
    also, yes I will tell you when you need to put some pants on. I expect the same.

    Date: 2009-01-29 11:57 am (UTC)
    ironed_orchid: watercolour and pen style sketch of a brown tabby cat curl up with her head looking up at the viewer and her front paw stretched out on the left (Default)
    From: [personal profile] ironed_orchid
    I'm sure that it's far too early in 2009 to have had the definitive Cultural Appropriation/Racist Representation flamewar. I mean, there are months to go before Wiscon.

    Good luck with your Novel of Doom.

    Date: 2009-01-30 12:46 am (UTC)
    ironed_orchid: watercolour and pen style sketch of a brown tabby cat curl up with her head looking up at the viewer and her front paw stretched out on the left (Default)
    From: [personal profile] ironed_orchid
    Yup. So we'll have plenty more flamewars before the year is over.

    Profile

    sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
    sabotabby

    May 2026

    S M T W T F S
          1 2
    345 6 7 8 9
    10 1112 13 14 1516
    1718 19 2021 2223
    24252627282930
    31      

    Style Credit

    Page generated May. 22nd, 2026 07:28 pm
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags

    Most Popular Tags