Ah, House. You have been a fun diversion for the past five years, but I think it may be time to call it quits. As in, what the fuck was with the season opener? Did we really need a pale copy of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (a book/movie that I already find deeply problematic) with every possible Hollywood stereotype of people with mental illnesses thrown in for good measure?
For those who missed it, the last season of House ended with the titular character hallucinating first his best friend's dead girlfriend, then an affair with his boss, and finally deciding that yes, he had a Bit of a Problem. Whereupon he checked himself into a psychiatric hospital. So far so good. One worries about this from a narrative point-of-view, because a sane and well-adjusted House without a Vicodin addiction is not exactly the world's most interesting character, but hey, I'll put up with a lot because of Hugh Laurie's pretty, pretty eyes.
So this season opened with a withdrawal montage. I hate withdrawal montages, but probably the only thing more annoying is actually witnessing withdrawal (have you ever seen someone go through withdrawal?) so, okay. Vicodin-free, he tries to check himself out, only to find that while he's technically free to leave, he doesn't get back his medical license until the chief psychiatrist at the hospital writes him a note.
He's then put on a random ward with a collection of random crazies. And I use this term deliberately. Because they are all Hollywood!Crazy, diagnosable by a single glance, an uttered phrase, or, in some cases, what they don't say. But there's the paranoid guy who's twitchy, the manic guy who raps, the depressed girl who tugs at her long sleeves to cover up her slit wrists, the anorexic guy who won't eat, the silent girl who stares creepily straight ahead. The doctors act like camp counsellors, cheerfully announcing, "group time!" Regardless of the specific mental illness, the treatment is the same: talking about your feelings AA-style, and pills.
House, being still in-character for the beginning of the episode, predictably tries to raise hell, and that's where we get our Cuckoo's Nest parody. It ought to be funny, but it's just painful. The other patients have no character beyond the clichés of their various illnesses, and they are as easily led around as children, be it in open revolt or covert schemes. The "twist," such that it is, is that instead of Nurse Ratched, House's antagonist is an intelligent and well-meaning doctor who outsmarts him and only wants the best for his patients, even though at least one has seen no improvement for a decade.
The moral of the episode is ghastly: Be good, follow the rules, and everything will be okay. House's "cure" is that he needs to cooperate with the nice doctor and learn to connect with people again (which he does by having an affair with the married friend of one of his patients). And take pills. Which makes no sense, as I don't think SSRIs do anything to prevent hallucinations. But then, another patient is cured after she opens a music box, so who knows. Didn't this show do its research at some point?
It's brutal to watch fictional portrayals of mental illness, particularly when one has struggled with mental illness for a decade. I suppose I'm lucky in that I'm pretty functional. On most days, I win and depression loses. It used to be the other way around. And having lived with depression still defines me to some degree. But you can't tell from looking at me. I don't have the sort of shorthand one sees every time a mentally ill character appears on TV or in a movie. Part of the cruelty of mental illness is its invisibility.
It's brutal to watch fictional portrayals of mentally ill people because these portrayals tend to re-enforce one of a few narratives. Mentally ill people are beautiful sacred oracles into a greater truth who need to be freeeeeee (the anti-psychiatry narrative favoured by the left and most sci-fi/fantasy; see also why I have problems with Cuckoo's Nest). Mentally ill people are mental children who need to be cared for and protected from themselves (the liberal narrative; my problem with this episode, mainly). Mentally ill people are faking it or weak and just need to get their shit together (the conservative narrative; why James Frey deserves to be beaten with a trout). Nowhere does the person living with mental illness get their own story, their own interests or personality or beliefs. The person is the sum of their (visible, highly stylized) illness. And the story is praised for its depth and daring.
Shorter
sabotabby: I might be paranoid, but you never see me twitching at invisible UFOs.
For those who missed it, the last season of House ended with the titular character hallucinating first his best friend's dead girlfriend, then an affair with his boss, and finally deciding that yes, he had a Bit of a Problem. Whereupon he checked himself into a psychiatric hospital. So far so good. One worries about this from a narrative point-of-view, because a sane and well-adjusted House without a Vicodin addiction is not exactly the world's most interesting character, but hey, I'll put up with a lot because of Hugh Laurie's pretty, pretty eyes.
So this season opened with a withdrawal montage. I hate withdrawal montages, but probably the only thing more annoying is actually witnessing withdrawal (have you ever seen someone go through withdrawal?) so, okay. Vicodin-free, he tries to check himself out, only to find that while he's technically free to leave, he doesn't get back his medical license until the chief psychiatrist at the hospital writes him a note.
He's then put on a random ward with a collection of random crazies. And I use this term deliberately. Because they are all Hollywood!Crazy, diagnosable by a single glance, an uttered phrase, or, in some cases, what they don't say. But there's the paranoid guy who's twitchy, the manic guy who raps, the depressed girl who tugs at her long sleeves to cover up her slit wrists, the anorexic guy who won't eat, the silent girl who stares creepily straight ahead. The doctors act like camp counsellors, cheerfully announcing, "group time!" Regardless of the specific mental illness, the treatment is the same: talking about your feelings AA-style, and pills.
House, being still in-character for the beginning of the episode, predictably tries to raise hell, and that's where we get our Cuckoo's Nest parody. It ought to be funny, but it's just painful. The other patients have no character beyond the clichés of their various illnesses, and they are as easily led around as children, be it in open revolt or covert schemes. The "twist," such that it is, is that instead of Nurse Ratched, House's antagonist is an intelligent and well-meaning doctor who outsmarts him and only wants the best for his patients, even though at least one has seen no improvement for a decade.
The moral of the episode is ghastly: Be good, follow the rules, and everything will be okay. House's "cure" is that he needs to cooperate with the nice doctor and learn to connect with people again (which he does by having an affair with the married friend of one of his patients). And take pills. Which makes no sense, as I don't think SSRIs do anything to prevent hallucinations. But then, another patient is cured after she opens a music box, so who knows. Didn't this show do its research at some point?
It's brutal to watch fictional portrayals of mental illness, particularly when one has struggled with mental illness for a decade. I suppose I'm lucky in that I'm pretty functional. On most days, I win and depression loses. It used to be the other way around. And having lived with depression still defines me to some degree. But you can't tell from looking at me. I don't have the sort of shorthand one sees every time a mentally ill character appears on TV or in a movie. Part of the cruelty of mental illness is its invisibility.
It's brutal to watch fictional portrayals of mentally ill people because these portrayals tend to re-enforce one of a few narratives. Mentally ill people are beautiful sacred oracles into a greater truth who need to be freeeeeee (the anti-psychiatry narrative favoured by the left and most sci-fi/fantasy; see also why I have problems with Cuckoo's Nest). Mentally ill people are mental children who need to be cared for and protected from themselves (the liberal narrative; my problem with this episode, mainly). Mentally ill people are faking it or weak and just need to get their shit together (the conservative narrative; why James Frey deserves to be beaten with a trout). Nowhere does the person living with mental illness get their own story, their own interests or personality or beliefs. The person is the sum of their (visible, highly stylized) illness. And the story is praised for its depth and daring.
Shorter
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:37 pm (UTC)The only thing right with the season premier of House was that Booger was in it *residual squees*
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:48 pm (UTC)Also, Franka Potente has a great smile. And Silent Girl reminded me of someone I used to know, and so I found myself liking her regardless of how stupid her plot was.
P.S. I probably come off as even less crazy IRL than on the internets. I am much more honest when I'm pseudononymous; in person, I come off as ridiculously cheerful and together.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:39 pm (UTC)I also loved "Broken" - the mental patient characters were not meant to be taken literally, they were metaphorical counter-balances and logical-extensions to House's own psychological faculties. I think you missed the intention of the episode - to portray the psyche of House in a dramatic setting.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:50 pm (UTC)the mental patient characters were not meant to be taken literally, they were metaphorical counter-balances and logical-extensions to House's own psychological faculties.
I don't know; I can usually tell when characters aren't meant to be taking literally. Amber, for example. This just struck me as lazy writing.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:27 pm (UTC)I so, so, want to believe this.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 09:56 pm (UTC)What I'm saying is that cultural texts possessing any coherence are probably unavoidably generalized, incomplete and simplified. And that's precisely why we like them.
No lock, eh?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:04 pm (UTC)To some degree it's unavoidable or desirable. (House himself being a highly stylized character, but in a way that is fun to watch. The episodic nature of the show doesn't allow for a ton of character development.) But there's a difference between a trope and a cliché.
No lock. If people were more open about the subject of mental illness, perhaps we would get some better media portrayals.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:23 pm (UTC)Not that it justifies the specific badnesses, but in some sense this was always going to be a bad episode. They'd dug themselves into a hole - they'd put House in rehab so they had to get him out and back to doctoring, which meant they had to make him 'well', which put them into 'happy ending' territory, which is not where the show lives. (OK, the patients live nine times out of ten, but House himself is never happy). Hopefully it'll get better now they've got past that speed-bump...
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:25 pm (UTC)I've never seen West Wing. Is it any good?
LOLOLOL I just clicked on
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:29 pm (UTC)What also bugged me about the episode was that someone who's being diagnosed & hospitalized for the first time doesn't end up on the floor with people who have been hospitalized multiple times. That's not how CAMH does it, at least.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 10:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 11:33 pm (UTC)Generally speaking, though, I haven't seen such a craptastic portray of mental illni since. . .well, they're all pretty bad, generally speaking, but Sally Field as Bipolar-Mad-Crazy-Mad! on ER a few seasons back remains a pretty sharp thorn in my side.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 11:42 pm (UTC)I'm trying to think of a portrayal that I liked, and I'm falling short. Buffy had a realistic one but it made for such bad drama that I'm hesitant to go there.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-25 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 12:21 am (UTC)So even though the other characters were gross charicatures and the mental hospital staff actually had good intentions and were all-knowingly correct in their actions, House himself was ACTUALLY CHANGING! For the first time ever! And he wasn't compulsively acting out of fear, and he was opening up about shit, etc. His acting was great enough, as usual, to carry it for me.
So, basically, you're totally right about every last thing in your post, and I still adored this premiere and hope that it will bring the show back to the other side of the shark.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 12:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 12:22 am (UTC)Another reason to leave "catch up on House" at the bottom of my to-do list.
I actually liked Kutner's death because I was already connecting really well with his character and learning that he was suicidal just made the comparison even more apt. So I was sad because he lost the battle/died pointlessly, but also happy.
^^I was going to transfer this paragraph into a reply to the comment where you actually mentioned Kutner, but then I realized I can make it relevant to the post at large after all: I think another thing I liked about Kutner's death was that it was so completely out of the blue. It really drove home the point that anyone can be suicidal, and sometimes there are no answers. Unless one of the episodes I haven't seen since then has provided a magic fix, but I doubt it.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 12:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 04:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 02:07 pm (UTC)In the past, even when someone's been crazy, there's usually something else going on. It's not like all of the character's life can be summarized by "crazy." They just threw that out the door on this one.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 05:29 am (UTC)I feel better about watching no TV. This is very crankymaking. Making light of mental illness, very not cool. Argh.
[incoherent]
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 02:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 02:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 05:47 am (UTC)After most of a season building up to this point they forced House into a contrived maudlin buildingsroman while simultaneously trying to show as little of it as possible.
Which is bullshit as it would have made more sense - for the character and the show dynamic - to have him detox, confront the deaths and establish competence yet drop therapy the moment he got his license.
In fact it seemed they were setting up the catatonic character so House would diagnose her with some rare disorder or bad medication, thus making the head shrink to admit he was functional and trying to blackmail him into opting for full therapy was wrong.
This would have made more sense than having him be a dime store McMurphy and also would have fit the format of the show, which is supposed to be medical mysteries.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 02:14 pm (UTC)It bugged me so much. What you said would have worked so much better.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 08:48 am (UTC)Who is he, or is he so annoying that I'd rather not know?
I find many people with mental illnesses DO conform to stereotype, but usually in very funny ways, such as stripping naked in public and thinking they're Jesuses or psychics or being hypnotised. I haven't met a manic rapper yet, but many manic people in the mental hospital here seem to be into rapping and DJing, so the OT has set up a DJing class. That might be because a lot of people diagnosed with schizophrenia happen to be young black men - sorry for the stereotype, but they do seem to be into DJing. And from what I've seen patients do get the same treatment irrespective of personal circumstances or illness! All the doctors have are pills that are meant to cover lots of symptoms in one. Sigh.
Not disagreeing with you at all - just sighing at how hopeless much of the system seems to be!
I like your summary of mental illness narratives. I am not intelligent to think of such things from such a perspective. Too wrapped up inside it all. I used to believe in the first one a lot from reading R.D. Laing and listening to my brother, who studied it a lot, but now I am a mixture between the second and just general irritation with mad people and finding they really take the biscuit. Mad cognitive blip sufferers.
I have never been a mental patient myself, just on the outskirts. I have nursed a dying alcoholic for many years, so have seen lots of withdrawal, though with alcohol withdrawal the sufferer usually dies in a fit unless the doctors can be persuaded with lots of shouting to give them an substitute injection in time.
Well, I'm glad I didn't see that House episode!!!
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 02:20 pm (UTC)I'm sure you can see why this is a dangerous and irresponsible narrative.
As to which narrative I believe, I don't think any are complete. I have had it with people telling me that I was a traitor to the revolution for taking SSRIs and believing they worked, that I was "faking it" and just needed to get my shit together, or being condescended to when I say that some of my limitations are things that I can live with and I want to direct my own life. Particularly the far-left and far-right narratives seem to be quite similar to me, in that the way one approaches mental illness in an individual is almost exactly the same if you believe either that mental illness is entirely the product of a society gone mad or that it's entirely the product of a society gone soft.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 01:03 pm (UTC)Anecdata based on lots of experience, this is how they do shit in RL.
I got over House a long time ago.
Even Monk a show starring a man with OCD is a minstrel show. I can't even think about it.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 02:30 pm (UTC)This has been my experience in at least one case (pre-finding someone who could actually help me); nevertheless, on the show, they portray it to be ultimately effective.
Even Monk a show starring a man with OCD is a minstrel show. I can't even think about it.
I haven't seen "Monk." Sounds like something that should be good but isn't.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 01:08 pm (UTC)So, really - colour me surprised that they did mental health condition FAIL as well.
(And yet, I was assured just last week that only the Victorians treated people who were mentally ill poorly and had a stigma against it. We're all so modern and accepting now.)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 04:04 pm (UTC)(And yet, I was assured just last week that only the Victorians treated people who were mentally ill poorly and had a stigma against it. We're all so modern and accepting now.)
Wait, what?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Sorry I'm late to the discussion; I just saw this linked by troubleinchina...
From:Re: Sorry I'm late to the discussion; I just saw this linked by troubleinchina...
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 04:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-28 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-28 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-07 09:04 pm (UTC)http://www.dosenation.com/listing.php?id=6678
DEA vs House
no subject
Date: 2009-10-10 12:14 pm (UTC)