Anger: What Riles You Up?
Aug. 29th, 2006 09:53 pmThanks to everyone who responded to the Big Ol' Anger Survey! You'll notice the entry is friends-only now. I didn't expect people to get quite so confessional. You folks rock.
Let's start with the results to the first question: What gets you angry? (Just like JMPP, I'm reducing everything to numbers. You are 89.3456% angrier than the general population.)

Click on Clarence and his friend to find out what makes Harlem angry.
Injustice tops out the list by a huge margin. Fourteen of you listed injustice, cruelty, or oppression. Somehow, this is not surprising. Closely related—some form of intolerance, bigotry, misogyny, racism, or general asshaberdashery pissed off seven of you.
The next biggest grouping had to do with being dismissed, condescended to, or otherwise not taken seriously: Seven people got riled up about that.
Seven people hate teh stupid.
Six people felt some sort of antagonism towards authority figures, be they Bush or your teacher.
Other significant irritations: lying (4), everything (4), the news or some current event (3), yourselves or your own failings (3), other people (3), the media (2), frustration or unmet expectations (2), entitlement (2), and bad drivers or slow walkers (2). Five of you said something specific that couldn't be grouped with anything else. Three of you were obviously trying to make me laugh. (It worked. By the by, "Pluto-huggers" was my favourite response.) I found it odd that only one person mentioned betrayal, so I didn't group it with the rest of the miscellaneous responses.
The idea I started with is that anger gets a bad rap because it is the emotion most capable of producing change. It's anecdotal, but your responses do seem to fit neatly with that. Hmmm.
Also surprising: Not a one of you mentioned Harlan Ellison grabbing Connie Willis's boob at the Hugos, despite Boobiegate being the one of the leading sources of anger in the blogosphere at the moment. What gives, people?
Let's start with the results to the first question: What gets you angry? (Just like JMPP, I'm reducing everything to numbers. You are 89.3456% angrier than the general population.)
Click on Clarence and his friend to find out what makes Harlem angry.
Injustice tops out the list by a huge margin. Fourteen of you listed injustice, cruelty, or oppression. Somehow, this is not surprising. Closely related—some form of intolerance, bigotry, misogyny, racism, or general asshaberdashery pissed off seven of you.
The next biggest grouping had to do with being dismissed, condescended to, or otherwise not taken seriously: Seven people got riled up about that.
Seven people hate teh stupid.
Six people felt some sort of antagonism towards authority figures, be they Bush or your teacher.
Other significant irritations: lying (4), everything (4), the news or some current event (3), yourselves or your own failings (3), other people (3), the media (2), frustration or unmet expectations (2), entitlement (2), and bad drivers or slow walkers (2). Five of you said something specific that couldn't be grouped with anything else. Three of you were obviously trying to make me laugh. (It worked. By the by, "Pluto-huggers" was my favourite response.) I found it odd that only one person mentioned betrayal, so I didn't group it with the rest of the miscellaneous responses.
The idea I started with is that anger gets a bad rap because it is the emotion most capable of producing change. It's anecdotal, but your responses do seem to fit neatly with that. Hmmm.
Also surprising: Not a one of you mentioned Harlan Ellison grabbing Connie Willis's boob at the Hugos, despite Boobiegate being the one of the leading sources of anger in the blogosphere at the moment. What gives, people?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 11:39 am (UTC)I thought it was widely known that Ellison was a fucking asshole anyway. Maybe it's just well known to me because my husband has various friends who are on the edges of those circles (dark fantasy and horror writers).
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:37 am (UTC)I might have to do a "What turns you on" one in similar form:) (Me: Carrots)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:54 am (UTC)Making fun of hippies
Libertarians
Gay pirates and/or cowboys
Sex (assuming the poster is a reasonably attractive woman)
It's an internets rule.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 03:20 am (UTC)Why is Bukkake only #14? And did we talk about the Taiwanese glowing pigs already? Because I actually like those.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 03:22 am (UTC)Maybe that'd be a good premise for a sitcom: JEWCOPS!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:48 pm (UTC)Are there other Clarence videos out there. Where can you get them?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 03:01 pm (UTC)Go to YouTube and search for "wonder showzen." You'll find all sorts of awesome.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-31 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 04:40 pm (UTC)Anger, in my experience, will produce change, but the quality of change is typically damaged by the anger.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 05:12 pm (UTC)The SUV, too, is a wonderful example: a modicum of safety (illusory, of course, but that's to my secret satisfaction) purchased at a general increase in risk of death to non-SUV drivers, i.e. me. "My kids lives as they commute to soccer practice are worth more than your life" is the maxim one must endorse.
In short, I think the categorical imperative is great stuff. Everyone looks at it and shudders over the apparently passionless, abstract exceptionlessness of it, but that's the wrong way to read it. What it actually says: one doesn't get to be exceptional in how one behaves simply because of what one is.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 05:39 pm (UTC)The SUV is a symptom of a deep flaw in Western culture. I mean, automobiles are, in general, but the very idea of choosing a car because it's more likely to kill someone else than you? How very, very disturbing.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 06:33 pm (UTC)