❄️🍊

Dec. 16th, 2017 05:43 pm
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
I wonder if the ❄️🍊 crowd is going to speak up for the right of the CDC to say the banned words:

vulnerable
entitlement
diversity
transgender
fetus
evidence-based
science-based

No?
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (teachthecontroversy)
It's almost New Year's! I don't do resolutions or year-in-review posts anymore; I guess I just don't see much of a point. I always end up roughly the same person, if drastically more hungover, on the 1st as I was on the 31st. Case in point: I'm up, drinking my morning coffee with a cat on my wrist, and arguing about conspiracy theories at The Other Place.

This is mostly a post about Monsanto, if you are going to be upset by my opinions about Monsanto and/or GMOs. A lot of people tend to be.

A fellow educator posted a link, with his added commentary, "Very disturbing."

unsourced facebooksharing

The original post linked to an article from Health Impact News (no, I'm not going to give them the hits), a site which boasts that it brings you, quote, "News that Impacts Your Health that Other Media Sources May Censor!" Sounds legit, right? The headline, "MIT Researcher: Glyphosate Herbicide will Cause Half of All Children To Have Autism by 2025" sounds even more so.

Wake up, sheeple!

The cool thing is that I don't even need to read the article to know it's bullshit. I can just look at the headline. I read it anyway, but it was exactly what you'd expect. I posted a quick response last night, "On the plus side, it's almost certainly not true!"* and left it at that.

The fellow responded, Eeyore-like, "I hope you're right."

I replied that I was, because it was pseudoscience. The thing with the conspiracy inclined mind, though, is once they get a bone, they don't wanna let go of it.

Gets a bit long. )

So, eh, don't know if it'll get through. But maybe I planted a little seed of critical thinking, there?

And since that seed is a GMO, science and skeptism will almost certainly triumph!

Happy New Year, sheeple!

* I'd take out the "almost certainly" if I hadn't been hungover at  the time.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (harper = evil)
Conservative senator Patrick Brazeau is a wife-beating racist shitbag, and it seems to have caught up with him. Read this, then read this, and then enjoy the happy memory of that time Justin Trudeau punched him out. (Note: I also enjoy the thought of Trudeau getting punched, but Brazeau is more of a scumbag. Note also that this typifies my feelings about the Liberal and Conservative parties, respectively.)

While we're on the topic of people who shouldn't be in positions of authority, the LAPD has now totally lost its shit. If I'm following the story correctly, an ex-LAPD officer went nuts and killed a bunch of people after trying to whistleblow about corruption in the department. The LAPD reacted by shooting him just kidding, shooting two completely innocent people who looked nothing like him (as in they were Asian women and he is a black dude, but, you know, driving a car that looked a bit like his).

My pension plan is evil. :( I mean, I knew that, but this is really evil.

If you need a chaser after that, here's a video of the first Hello Kitty in space.



I also like this list of 25 things you don't have to justify to anyone. I disagree with #22, though—who you vote for affects other people, and if you vote for someone who, for example, wants to take some of my human rights away, I reserve the right to judge you for it. Otherwise, though, I think it's got a message many of us need to hear right now.

In other news, the snow is really coming down, isn't it? I am really enjoying my classes this semester and I hate the thought of losing a day of teaching, but—you know, if it's a snow day and I can hang around in my pyjamas all day watching The Wire and cuddling with my cats, that's okay too.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (the beatings will continue...)
Stanford Magazine has an article with a series of interviews from researchers and participants in the Stanford Prison Experiment. It's a fascinating read, especially when you see what some of the people involved have ended up doing with their lives.

Some choice quotes:

If someone had said that in six days you can take 10 healthy college kids, in good health and at the peak of resilience, and break them down by subjecting them to things that are commonplace and relatively mild by the standards of real prisons—I'm not sure I would have believed it, if I hadn't seen it happen.
— Craig Haney, SPE researcher, now a professor and prison reform advocate


One thing that I thought was interesting about the experiment was whether, if you believe society has assigned you a role, do you then assume the characteristics of that role? I teach at an inner city high school in Oakland. These kids don't have to go through experiments to witness horrible things. But what frustrates my colleagues and me is that we are creating great opportunities for these kids, we offer great support for them, why are they not taking advantage of it? Why are they dropping out of school? Why are they coming to school unprepared? I think a big reason is what the prison study shows—they fall into the role their society has made for them.
— Richard Yacco, SPE prisoner, now a schoolteacher


People will sometimes come up to me—at conferences, or maybe they're students who have taken psychology classes—and they'll say, "Oh my God, you're such a hero! What is it like to be a hero?" And it's always a little surprising to me because it sure didn't feel heroic at the time. The prison study has given me a new understanding of what "heroism" means. It's not some egocentric, I'm-going-to-rush-into-that-burning-building thing—it's about seeing something that needs to be addressed and saying, I need to help and do something to make it better.
— Christina Maslach, the whistleblower, now a professor
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (science vs religion)
If there is any cosmic justice whatsoever, glow-in-the-dark pterosaurs are still alive in Papua New Guinea.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (bat country)
There are many pictures and even a short video of our adventures today. I tried to weed, honestly I did, but there was so much awesome that I almost considered splitting the awesome in half.

road trip 2010
We tip generously, but [livejournal.com profile] monster_grrrl goes a step farther and also tips a dinosaur.

Beneath the cut lies:
• Natural History Museum and Bug Art
• Dog Chapel
• Bread and Puppets Theater
• The Diet Coke and Mentos Experiment
• Random cool things that happened and animals, adorable and otherwise

are you ready? )

Tonight, we are in Montréal at [livejournal.com profile] ivytheadventure's pad. We bumped into one of her friends and went to her place for beer and conversation. Tomorrow we head home.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (teachthecontroversy)
Via [livejournal.com profile] hayleysaurusrex, an interesting, if nonsensical creationist page about vestigial organs. I do not understand any of this as it is clearly written by moon people or something, but look how awesome evolution is compared to creationism:



That's right, you godless heathens! Evolution will give you a face like Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean and eye-nipples.

Wait, why is this a problem? Evolution is badass.

[livejournal.com profile] roter_terror, who also posted an excellent analysis of capitalism and health care, also informed the internets about a BBC miniseries called the Fall of Eagles, which reportedly stars Patrick Stewart as Lenin.

Evidence:



I clearly need to see this, like, yesterday.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
Via [livejournal.com profile] hayleysaurusrex, an interesting, if nonsensical creationist page about vestigial organs. I do not understand any of this as it is clearly written by moon people or something, but look how awesome evolution is compared to creationism:



That's right, you godless heathens! Evolution will give you a face like Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean and eye-nipples.

Wait, why is this a problem? Evolution is badass.

[livejournal.com profile] roter_terror, who also posted an excellent analysis of capitalism and health care, also informed the internets about a BBC miniseries called the Fall of Eagles, which reportedly stars Patrick Stewart as Lenin.

Evidence:



I clearly need to see this, like, yesterday.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (raspberry reich)
Photobucket

[livejournal.com profile] zingerella and I have determined by skientifical research (a.k.a. polling a bunch of our friends at Stitch n' Bitch) that two iconic movies of the 80s and 90s, Terminator 2 and Aliens, have helped a lot of lesbians figure out their sexuality and have nudged otherwise straight women just a little farther along the Kinsey Scale. All of the women involved in this conversation of a certain generation who had seen said movies agreed.

Photobucket
Oh, admit it.

But what we also realized was that we have no idea whether the equivalent sorts of movies exist for men because, well, male sexuality is very confusing. We sort of figure that there are certain Kinsey-shifting actors and movies out there, but we're not entirely sure what they are.

Photobucket
We think that this guy would probably do it, though.

So we require your input, O Livejournal friends and acquaintances. Which movies and actors made you gay(er)?
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
Photobucket

[livejournal.com profile] zingerella and I have determined by skientifical research (a.k.a. polling a bunch of our friends at Stitch n' Bitch) that two iconic movies of the 80s and 90s, Terminator 2 and Aliens, have helped a lot of lesbians figure out their sexuality and have nudged otherwise straight women just a little farther along the Kinsey Scale. All of the women involved in this conversation of a certain generation who had seen said movies agreed.

Photobucket
Oh, admit it.

But what we also realized was that we have no idea whether the equivalent sorts of movies exist for men because, well, male sexuality is very confusing. We sort of figure that there are certain Kinsey-shifting actors and movies out there, but we're not entirely sure what they are.

Photobucket
We think that this guy would probably do it, though.

So we require your input, O Livejournal friends and acquaintances. Which movies and actors made you gay(er)?

TIME EATER

Sep. 19th, 2008 06:20 pm
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (boilerplate)
Photobucket

I don't care what it does, as long as we're that much closer to a steampunk future.

Chronophage/Large Hadron Collider OTP.

TIME EATER

Sep. 19th, 2008 06:20 pm
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
Photobucket

I don't care what it does, as long as we're that much closer to a steampunk future.

Chronophage/Large Hadron Collider OTP.
sabotabby: (jetpack)
...airships!

(I'd meant to blog this when [livejournal.com profile] frandroid first posted it, but of course I've been terribly busy.)

Anyway, I keep seeing posters around town for this fellow Monbiot and his new book about how we are all fucked. I like him, if only because his solution to the energy crisis is to replace airplanes with pure, unmitigated awesome.
Airships fly much lower than planes – typically at about 4000 feet – which means that their emissions of water vapour have very little effect on temperature. If they were powered by hydrogen fuel cells, they would be almost silent, greatly reducing the effects for people on the ground. Though they are slower than jets, the cabin can be built much wider, which means that travelling by airship would be rather like travelling by cruise ship, but at twice the speed and using a fraction of the fuel.

Photobucket
y/y?

He also lists a bunch of disadvantages, but they're all outweighed by how hardcore it would be to travel by dirigible.

Photobucket
I mean, really.

EDIT: I am jealous of this guy's jetpack.
sabotabby: (jetpack)
...airships!

(I'd meant to blog this when [livejournal.com profile] frandroid first posted it, but of course I've been terribly busy.)

Anyway, I keep seeing posters around town for this fellow Monbiot and his new book about how we are all fucked. I like him, if only because his solution to the energy crisis is to replace airplanes with pure, unmitigated awesome.
Airships fly much lower than planes – typically at about 4000 feet – which means that their emissions of water vapour have very little effect on temperature. If they were powered by hydrogen fuel cells, they would be almost silent, greatly reducing the effects for people on the ground. Though they are slower than jets, the cabin can be built much wider, which means that travelling by airship would be rather like travelling by cruise ship, but at twice the speed and using a fraction of the fuel.

Photobucket
y/y?

He also lists a bunch of disadvantages, but they're all outweighed by how hardcore it would be to travel by dirigible.

Photobucket
I mean, really.

EDIT: I am jealous of this guy's jetpack.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (ignorance)
When someone smart tells you not to Google "Cymothoa Exigua," you should listen to that person.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
When someone smart tells you not to Google "Cymothoa Exigua," you should listen to that person.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (no pigdogs)
Does evolutionary psychology even exist as a discipline outside of the interblahgs? I don't think it does. [livejournal.com profile] realcdaae did a good post awhile back where she referred to it as Social Darwinism for the 21st century—pseudo-science used to justify essentialist gender roles distilled from an idealized version of 1950s America. Which it is, of course, but my explanation was less charitable: It's a pseudo-science invented by dorky first-year college students to explain why they can't get dates.

As far as I can tell from reading posts by evo-trolls on feminist blogs, the logic goes something like this: Men and women are locked into gender roles established back when we lived in caves and men hunted and women gathered. Those who get their anthropological knowledge from somewhere other than the Flintstones will immediately see the problem with this basic assumption.


Earliest evidence of useless lug managing to get with a hot chick.

But let's assume they're right for a moment, and every modern discrepancy between men and women (there are only two genders in evolutionary psychology) can be traced back to something perfectly logical in human evolution. My personal favourite is the argument that men don't clean as often because they evolved with less of an ability to see dirt. This makes sense, because sharper vision is necessary for raising babies but not for hunting.

It seems, though, that belief in evo-psych is directly proportionate to one's inability to attract an appropriate "female mate" (evo-psych proponents never fail to describe women as such). It's a problem closely related to Nice GuyismTM; this belief system maintains that men are naturally attracted to conventionally attractive women (with symmetrical features! that indicate health for making babies!) and women look for qualities such as stability and financial security (geeky but nice! to support the babies!). This has everything to do with science, and nothing to do with popular culture memes that insist that the dirty, uncouth, beer-swilling schtub is always entitled to a hot chick. (It's been like this throughout human history. See illustration of cave-people, above.)

Evo-psych, despite pseudo-scientific pretensions, is closely linked to the fundangelical religious notion of man-as-beast, requiring the civilizing influence of a woman to be complete (but, of course, men instinctively need to spread their seed as far as possible, so they can't help cheating. Once they manage to get dates, that is.).

Finally, it's related to libertarianism (as is Social Darwinism), which is, interestingly enough, also related to an inability to get dates. Possibly because no one wants to date a guy who will kill and eat you if his trust fund runs out.

Feel free to spout off with your favourite evo-psych links and theories in the comments.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
Does evolutionary psychology even exist as a discipline outside of the interblahgs? I don't think it does. [livejournal.com profile] realcdaae did a good post awhile back where she referred to it as Social Darwinism for the 21st century—pseudo-science used to justify essentialist gender roles distilled from an idealized version of 1950s America. Which it is, of course, but my explanation was less charitable: It's a pseudo-science invented by dorky first-year college students to explain why they can't get dates.

As far as I can tell from reading posts by evo-trolls on feminist blogs, the logic goes something like this: Men and women are locked into gender roles established back when we lived in caves and men hunted and women gathered. Those who get their anthropological knowledge from somewhere other than the Flintstones will immediately see the problem with this basic assumption.


Earliest evidence of useless lug managing to get with a hot chick.

But let's assume they're right for a moment, and every modern discrepancy between men and women (there are only two genders in evolutionary psychology) can be traced back to something perfectly logical in human evolution. My personal favourite is the argument that men don't clean as often because they evolved with less of an ability to see dirt. This makes sense, because sharper vision is necessary for raising babies but not for hunting.

It seems, though, that belief in evo-psych is directly proportionate to one's inability to attract an appropriate "female mate" (evo-psych proponents never fail to describe women as such). It's a problem closely related to Nice GuyismTM; this belief system maintains that men are naturally attracted to conventionally attractive women (with symmetrical features! that indicate health for making babies!) and women look for qualities such as stability and financial security (geeky but nice! to support the babies!). This has everything to do with science, and nothing to do with popular culture memes that insist that the dirty, uncouth, beer-swilling schtub is always entitled to a hot chick. (It's been like this throughout human history. See illustration of cave-people, above.)

Evo-psych, despite pseudo-scientific pretensions, is closely linked to the fundangelical religious notion of man-as-beast, requiring the civilizing influence of a woman to be complete (but, of course, men instinctively need to spread their seed as far as possible, so they can't help cheating. Once they manage to get dates, that is.).

Finally, it's related to libertarianism (as is Social Darwinism), which is, interestingly enough, also related to an inability to get dates. Possibly because no one wants to date a guy who will kill and eat you if his trust fund runs out.

Feel free to spout off with your favourite evo-psych links and theories in the comments.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Mao Hello Kitty/springheel_jack)
Sometimes you make assumptions about regional foods. I know, for example, that most of what we call "Chinese food" in North America bears absolutely no resemblance to anything actually eaten in China. (My friend Ellen was in for a shocking surprise the first time she visited a Chinese restaurant here.) But [livejournal.com profile] corvus just alerted me to this article, which suggests that fake-Chinese food not only doesn't exist in China, but it doesn't even exist outside of Canada. WTF?

Anyway, he is pretty sure that they don't have sweet-and-sour chicken balls in the U.S. I find this mind-boggling; I always thought that this particular culinary violation originated in the States. But it appears that we might be to blame.


WTF is that? It's gross.

Therefore, a poll is in order:

[Poll #930814]

Happy Chinese New Year, everyone!
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
Sometimes you make assumptions about regional foods. I know, for example, that most of what we call "Chinese food" in North America bears absolutely no resemblance to anything actually eaten in China. (My friend Ellen was in for a shocking surprise the first time she visited a Chinese restaurant here.) But [livejournal.com profile] corvus just alerted me to this article, which suggests that fake-Chinese food not only doesn't exist in China, but it doesn't even exist outside of Canada. WTF?

Anyway, he is pretty sure that they don't have sweet-and-sour chicken balls in the U.S. I find this mind-boggling; I always thought that this particular culinary violation originated in the States. But it appears that we might be to blame.


WTF is that? It's gross.

Therefore, a poll is in order:

[Poll #930814]

Happy Chinese New Year, everyone!

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 23 45
678 910 1112
131415 1617 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 12:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags