sabotabby: (anarcat)
 [personal profile] frandroid is making Podcast Friday a thing and I think that's a great thing. Warning in advance that my entries will not be as regular as Reading Wednesdays, and that they will probably mostly be It Could Happen Here because that's most of what I listen to.

Like today! When we talk about The Curious Case of Nazi Catboys. (Part 2 is here.) This is a two-part episode featuring Garrison Davis, who has spent too long spelunking in the worst parts of the internet and emerged with this questionable gem. They had been teasing it on Twitter for some time and I thought it was just a reference to some anime. But no. It's a whole thing.

If you're not familiar with the podcast, It Could Happen Here is a Behind the Bastards spinoff show. It focuses on The Crumbles, or the ways in which civilizations don't exactly collapse but slowly decline, as well as how to survive during collapse and, it is hoped, build a new world in the shell of the old. It tends to be less funny than BtB, though it often does an uplifting episode about union organizing or something to balance what is typically grimdark subject matter. Nazi Catboys is both grimdark and absolutely hilarious, so it balances itself I guess.

Anyway, the important question here is why do Nazis like catboys and femboys? Why are some catboys and femboys Nazis? Aren't Nazis all about homophobia and transphobia? Well, yes, but sometimes you're such a misogynist that you swing right back to being kinda gay? It's horseshoe theory in action except the horseshoe is flung at your head and breaks your brain. Garrison does a deep dive into Alienated Youth and how online subcultural spaces are vulnerable to fascist infiltration. Along the way there is some fascinating examination of gender and power dynamics amongst contemporary fascists.

The one omission, I think, is not talking more about the Night of the Long Knives and the doomed queer ancestors to today's Nazi catboys, but you know, it's only two hours of Nazi catboy content and there is a lot to get in. Especially once they get into Nick Fuentes' catboy fetish and everyone starts laughing too hard to breathe. Seriously, it is very, very funny. I know far too much about Nick Fuentes owing to another podcast I love, I Don't Speak German, so getting to know this side of him was certainly an interesting ride.

In conclusion: We need to fight for queer and trans rights for many reasons, but one is to make a world in which queer and trans kids can just be queer and trans and wear cat ears in normal ways instead of having to hide out in horrible internet spaces where they get converted to fascism. 
sabotabby: swift wind from she-ra (swift wind)
Went to see OperaQ's reimagining of Purcell’s Dido and Aeneas, Dido and Belinda, with [personal profile] chickenfeet last night, and I need to tell you about it, because there is now a queer opera company in Toronto, and they did a genderswapped Dido and Aeneas focusing on Belinda's POV, set in a vaguely post-apocalyptic future, in a chapel. And it was everything that I hoped it would be. The singers filled the space (which is apparently usually a difficult space to work in, since it's long and narrow, but they made it work for the production), the costume and makeup design was fantastic, and they managed to somehow get humour into what rather a dark story about a melodramatic emo queen committing suicide. I was wondering how they would manage the singing, since gender is a social construct but voice pitch and range are not, but it really worked, even (especially, in the case of the sorcerer), where it was transposed.

I'm pretty excited about this company. We were comparing it to Opera Atelier's production of the same opera, which made the inexplicable choice to write a very condescending prologue since "no one reads the Aeneid anymore." Despite the fact that no one in this production looked like they were out of high school, they pulled off a much more mature, sophisticated interpretation, modernizing it for a contemporary crowd while still respecting said crowd's intelligence. I'd have done away with some of the voiceovers because I felt that the music and staging spoke for itself, but beyond that, really impressive stuff, and I can't wait to see what they do next.

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
I don't know if there's a term for the phenomenon where a well-intentioned, even effective, action gets taken up or co-opted by groups or institutions in a way that either waters it down and renders it purely symbolic, or distorts it beyond its original meaning, but for lack of a better term, I'll call it Franchise Activism.

Some examples:
  • Occupy in New York was an effective tactic. It was meant to disrupt business as usual, and it reframed class war in a way that could be easily discussed by people without a grounding in Marxism (which I actually think is useful, even though I'm a Marxist). Other cities took up the slogans. By the time it hit Toronto, it became about camping and using the People's Mic, even though the camp was not in a place that caused any disruption, and the People's Mic was unnecessary, since we don't have the sorts of bylaws here against amplified sound, and to be honest the number of people in the camp was so low by that point that you could just talk normally and everyone could hear you.
  •  

  • The Yellow Vests is about...something??? in France, but I guess one of the demands involves fuel access, so it was immediately coopted by astroturf-funded far-right groups to be about supporting the oil pipelines, opposing any sort of environmental regulation, and kicking out immigrants.
  •  

  • Free the Children harnessed the momentum of the anti-sweatshop movement and tamed it to render it completely ineffective. It took activists smuggling hidden cameras into maquiladoras and culture-jamming Nike billboards and created large binders that could be ordered by every school in Ontario, with a list of approved activities (bake sales!) to raise funds to send rich kids to dig wells in developing countries and "be the change." It holds annual slick events at the Air Canada Centre and rakes in a considerable profit, none of which is ever seen by the 14-year-old girl who makes your clothing in Bangladesh.

Today's ironic example of Franchise Activism is this incredible tweet by—who else?—the Ontario Tory government. For those of you who aren't Canuckistanians, Pink Shirt Day came about because a child was being bullied by homophobes for wearing a pink shirt, and other kids came to his aid and wore pink shirts in solidarity. This is the kind of relatively non-threatening activism that schools adore, so Pink Shirt Day was born. Now, do I always wear a pink shirt on Pink Shirt Day? I do. But I make it clear that it's about homophobia and transphobia specifically, not bullying in general. In some schools, the climate is still so bigoted that you can't name homophobia and transphobia out loud, but everyone is anti-bullying, so the meaning becomes diluted.

It goes without saying that our provincial government is composed entirely of bullies, all of them homophobic and transphobic. They created massive disruption and cost taxpayers a ridiculous amount of money to change a recently updated Health and Physical Education curriculum out of fear that young children would discover that it's okay to be queer and/or trans. You will note that the tweet does not mention queer or trans people or name homophobia or transphobia. But they perform the ritual anyway, as it's expected.

The Ontario government—which doesn't want anyone to talk about queer sexualities and gender diversity—tweeting about Pink Shirt Day without mentioning homophobia is exactly what I can't stand about Pink Shirt Day.

sabotabby: (furiosa)
 Today, some of the many things that outraged me:

Venezuela had a coup, which is not too surprising given how things were heading there. Now, Maduro is an asshat, to be sure, but he is an elected asshat (albeit in sketchy circumstances, but no sketchier than the US electoral college). What is shameful here is that Canada is among the countries following America's lead and recognizing the un-elected opposition over the elected government. Sure, it's not going to actually change facts on the ground because it's not like we could have stopped the US doing a coup in Latin America—that's kind of what they do—but you don't need to encourage that sort of behaviour.

After a stacked vote that nevertheless narrowly affirmed Pride's ban on paid, uniformed cops marching in the parade, confirmed heterosexual John Tory decided to opine anyway. Why the straightest walking sweater vest to ever exclusively be attracted to women gets to speak publicly about who marches in Pride is probably a question best left to Pride sponsor TD Bank, I guess.

Finally, closer to home, our loathsome regime, having destroyed student unions in a test case to see if they could ban unions altogether, is now talking about eliminating the already ridiculously high class caps on kindergarten and primary school classes. Small people can be stacked horizontally to fit more of them in a room.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
Testing LJ's new TOS (and DW's image hosting):

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (go fuck yourself)
While I don't, personally, have tons of people in my social circle who have horrid ideas, if you expand to friends-of-friends, I encounter a ton of people with horrid ideas on a shockingly frequent basis.

A few weeks ago, I was trying to convince a friend of mine, who is PoC and an academic at one of the most progressive institutions in North America, that he is underestimating the influence and popularity of white supremacy, among other reasons, because he cannot by definition hear what white people say when they talk amongst themselves. I can, and do, and trust me, it's pretty gross. The BLM action on Sunday unleashed a geyser of bile, like a burst pimple, amongst Well Meaning Concerned Straight White Folks Who Are Just Concerned About Sending the Right Message, and I'm still scraping the pus off this morning. The highlight was arguing with a (presumably Jewish, by the name) fellow who posted a Milo Yiannopoulous video about BLM and seemed unaware that he was parroting the beliefs of a misogynistic shitstain who would happily herd him—and me—to the gas chamber and then get in right after us.

It's not far under the surface, festering there. That's why the overt eruptions—PEGIDA, Trump, the alt-right, and so on—are more significant than their actual numbers imply. The vast majority of all humans can't logic worth a damn, and all it takes is the right vile viral idea for them to latch on.

Why the right has been more successful than the left on this is outside the scope of my little rant, but it has been. The fact that it's been able to infiltrate this far into my carefully cultivated echo chamber is proof of just how easy it is to slip into reactionary thinking.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (candle salad)
It's a rare day—and especially in the middle of some acrimonious contract negotiations with my union—that I'll say something nice about the Ontario Liberal government. But here it is: They updated the antediluvian Grade 1-8 sex ed curriculum and it's pretty good. It needed to be done and the changes are thoughtful and vital, including information about LGBTQ sexuality and affirmative consent. So, yay government on this one particular specific issue! You done good! You are terrible and corrupt when it comes to mostly everything else, but I can rest assured that you are sensible when it comes to the health education of young children, and I genuinely do appreciate that.

If you are interested and have enough time on your hands that you want to read really dull Ministry curriculum documents, you can read it here. It's not very interesting unless you're a teacher or a parent but there you go—it's totally public information and you can read it for free.

You know who didn't read it, though? Most people with an opinion about it.

Naturally, when I Googled "ontario sex education curriculum," the curriculum itself was not the first search result. Or the second, or the third. It's at least halfway down the page. The top hits are about protests—very sympathetically covered by the media, in contrast to how left-wing protests are covered—and misinformation by the likes of extremist anti-abortion and right-wing hate groups. This thing has been incredibly controversial, with said hate groups appearing on mainstream media with absurd claims that the new curriculum teaches seven-year-olds how to buttsex. (Spoiler: No it doesn't.)

One thing that would probably seem weird to an outsider is the support that the Tories (and make no mistake—these are not grassroots concern groups coming out of nowhere with no political agenda out of concern for THE CHILDRENS) have amongst marginalized and immigrant communities. I mean, you would think that a party of almost exclusively rich white men who hate people of colour, restrict immigration, have actual ties to white supremacist groups in some cases, and starve poor communities would not be well-liked by the people they make a living disparaging. But they do! And this is by design.

I'm reading Kill the Messengers: Stephen Harper's assault on your right to know, by Mark Bourrie, and there is a fascinating chapter as to why this is the case. Harper has a famous mistrust of journalists and believes that the mainstream media is a Liberal conspiracy that's out to get him, and one of the things he's been able to do in his tenure is to craft his message mainly towards the ethnic language media. So he will say one thing to Tamil language media, and another thing to Chinese language media, and so on, depending on whose votes he wants to win, and these are all tiny publications and stations that are basically just excited to get exclusive interviews with major politicians, so they softball interviews and don't have the budget to fact-check. It's completely brilliant and lets the Tories pander to various communities while actually enacting policies that directly harm them.

So when I see stories about how Ontario parents are staging a "strike" over the new sex-ed curriculum, I don't think I'm particularly conspiracy-minded to suspect a greater manipulation at work. I mean, let's be honest; it's pretty impressive if parents of young children can organize a bake sale to raise a few hundred dollars for their child's school, let alone a province-wide movement. Someone is out there, spreading lies and misinformation and playing the fears of parents to score electoral points. And it's working, because our mainstream media is not, in fact, a well-oiled Liberal machine and is actually an uncritical, bare-bones, defunded dinosaur gasping for its last breath as the meteors strike.

Who loses in this? Ontario, because this is all in service of eventually electing a Tory government that will be even worse than the abominable Liberal government. And most of all, the very children that these poor dupes want to protect. Every study ever done points to poor sex education as a major factor in teen pregnancy and the spread of STDs. And even more dramatically, I think this curriculum, properly implemented, is a crucial step in building a culture of positive consent that will pay off when these kids are teenagers and experimenting with sex for the first time. Teaching young kids that "yes means yes" means a future where not as many boys will think they're entitled to girls' bodies, and not as many girls will think it's their fault because he bought them dinner. Not as many queer and trans kids will grow up thinking that they're abnormal. This is a net gain for everyone, except for the backwards reactionaries.

Which is maybe why we need to reframe the debate. Instead of "concerned parents," let's focus on the manipulators behind the scenes and their pro-rape, homophobic, transphobic agenda. While sex ed is always a controversial thing, the butthurt of a few uptight pearl-clutchers has never made quite so many headlines in modern Canada, so follow the money. Who is really holding the kids hostage to make a political point?
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (fighting the man)
So the Fords held a completely illegal propaganda fest—sorry, a barbecue in which they bribed poor people with free food to score votes, during a municipal campaign, which is in no way political—last night. There's a sentence in that article about a skirmish between queer activists who came out to remind people that the Honourable Wife-Beater is a homophobic douchecanoe. Ford Nation people—who had nothing to do with the official campaign, of course, or the Laughable Bumblefuck's sustained attacks against queer people in this city—attacked the demonstrators, grabbed their signs, stomped on them, and even choked a guy:



While, you know, the immediate Ford family did not engage in personally bashing any queers, I checked the Star just now to see if there was any kind of statement disapproving of the actions of their supporters, and—nada. One can only conclude that they approve.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (porn!dalek)
It's that time of year again when some stick-up-the-ass prude tries to make Pride Toronto, the biggest tourist event of the year, not happen because dudes rubbing dicks together makes them feel funny in their pants. This year, it's all quiet on the Queers Against Israeli Apartheid front, so it's back to the usual bugbear of the pearl-clutching set—Totally Naked Toronto Men, a.k.a. TNT!Men, a.k.a. the naked old dudes with wrinkly scrotes.

God, I love those guys. Seriously, if it wasn't for them, Pride would suck, and not in the fun way. It's not that I have a thing for wrinkled scrote (I don't) but if TNT!Men weren't letting it all hang out, Pride would be 100% co-opted by banks. Not that it isn't 99.99% co-opted, but the presence of these excellently freaky gentlemen is a reminder that Pride used to be a controversial protest. Plus, they are super-nice (I've marched behind them before) and always willing to help out when Pride is threatened by someone's stupid manufactured controversy, even if it doesn't affect them personally. Good folks.

Today's moral panic is courtesy of some boneheaded TDSB trustees, who want City Hall to guarantee that their the children's delicate sensibilities will not be offended by the presence of a bum or, god forbid, an actual peen. Because it's a family event and they have a float there.

Um.

To illustrate the sheer douchebaggery at play here, allow me to present an allegory. Let's say you throw a birthday party every year. It used to be you and a couple of your buddies, but word got around that you throw a great party and there's plenty of sweet cake and great cocktails there, so people you didn't know very well started showing up. Cool! The more the merrier. The invite's open, as long as no one's actively planning to trash your house.

Then, one of the acquaintances you invite says she'll show up. But, she says, you can't serve alcohol.

"But it's my birthday!" you protest. "You don't need to drink if you don't want to, but lots of people who come really like cocktails."

"I'm bringing my kids," your guest replies. "And it's inappropriate for them to be around drinking."

You don't remember inviting her kids, but fine. "That's your call," you say, politely. "I'd love to have you, and your kids there, but I'm a grown-up and it's kind of a grown-up party. So if you bring them, it's your job as a good parent to supervise them and explain to them that sometimes grown-ups like to drink, but they shouldn't drink until they're older."

"You'd better not serve alcohol at your party," your guest shrieks. "Or I'm calling the cops! Also I am gluten-free and my kids are allergic to peanuts and make sure the cake is vegan."

You see my issue here. Fortunately, like all initiatives aimed at destroying Pride, this one will flop, as Pride is a massive juggernaut and teh gays have disposable income. But the fact that it's my employer being ridiculous makes me extra angry.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (pinko pie)
As you know, Bob, there is some sort of minor sporting event being held in an increasingly fascist country that has just passed some draconian anti-gay legislation. Our fine city has elected to—in a minor show of solidarity with the persecuted queer folks in Russia whose declining civil liberties and right to existence are being trampled so that pampered athletes can move very quickly and put balls in holes, and foreign journalists can complain about having to throw toilet paper in the wastebasket*—fly the rainbow flag over City Hall.

Okay, great! You'd have to be a real douchecanoe to object to that.

You don't even need to click to see what this link is about, do you?

Our paragon of upstanding morality and virtue states: “This about the Olympics, this about being patriotic to your country." Naturally, his handful of supporters leapt to declare him Not Homophobic despite his many, many homophobic statements and the fact that he's still not planning on attending World Pride when it arrives this summer to shower upon our fair city a shit-ton of money, tourists, and TD Bank-branded condoms**.

As always, the money quotes go to Brother Doug, who objects to the presence of buck-naked middle-aged men with potbellies (the fact that he clearly never looks in a mirror explains a lot, actually) and:

“He’s not homophobic, he has friends that are gay, he just chooses not to go.


I bet he has a lot of black fri—oh wait.

I for one would like to thank all of the potbellied, buck-naked middle-aged men out there for keeping these two bigoted wankers and their scumtastic drug-addled family away from World Pride. Pride should be classy, dammit.

In other news, rumour had it that late yesterday afternoon, two cops were seen entering Ford's office from the back door,† but I can find no confirmation of this online. Investigations into his myriad criminal activities are ongoing.

* Seriously? Travel to Not North America sometime. Though I did like the "dangerous face water" tweet.

** Look, a free condom is a free condom.

† Not a euphemism!

Tolerance

Jul. 9th, 2013 11:01 am
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (quit your whoring now)
Remember when Orson Scott Card was going to overthrow the American government if gay marriage became legal?

Now he's pleading for tolerance. Um. OSC, you're on the board of an organization that has, as pretty much its sole mandate, intolerance.

A boycott is not censorship. No one owes OSC, or anyone else, a living as a writer. No one owes him a platform from which to spew his bigotry. Man, I hope this movie flops harder than a dying fish.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (motherfucking books)
I finally finished reading Samuel R. Delany’s Through the Valley of the Nest of Spiders, a.k.a. the rather large brick that’s taken up residency on my nightstand for the past few months. With some caveats, I’d say that it was worth slogging through and that some of you might want to read it (though I think that the handful of people on my friends list who would want to read it most already have).

I’m going to put all my other thoughts under the cut. I don’t believe in trigger warnings and don’t generally employ them on LJ, but if you’re triggered by something, it’s probably somewhere in this book.

keep reading? )

Hat-tip to [livejournal.com profile] nihilistic_kid for sending me a copy since for some reason it wasn't at the library. You can read his much more detailed review here. Jo Walton's is also worth reading.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (red flag over TO)
A few people have asked about FordWatch and why I've stopped posting a count of how many days it's been since the Honourable Wife-Beating, Drunk-Driving, Ass-Grabbing, Bird-Flipping, Crack-Smoking, and Possibly Drug-Dealer-Murdering Mayor has done something stupid. The answer is that I designed the graphic to display only whole numbers demarcating full days, and he can't go a single day without doing multiple things that are so stupid that it breaks my brain to even think about it. [livejournal.com profile] bcholmes still has it up on Under the Beret, but as you can see, the counter is permanently stuck at 0. Apparently someone asked her why there was space for four digits there. Heh.

So! What's going on with our fair city today? Well, a body was discovered in the Humber River in Etobicoke, but it appears to be that of a missing man who drowned rescuing his dog and not that of our still-missing video guys. The Star is now saying that Anthony Smith was not killed over the crack video but because of local drug feuds. I wouldn't rule out the possibility that said local drug feuds involve the Fords in some way, but the Star is, and it's kind of their business to go after Ford. So. The HWB and/or allies likely did not kill Smith, but with the whereabouts of the video guys still unknown, I'm not striking "potential murderer" off his list of crimes.

Link round-up from the Star:

Premier Kathleen Wynne, who had previously hinted that she might step in to save Toronto from its current chaos, actually can't do anything. Good. I respect her for trying, but it's best for everyone if she keeps this at arm's length and lets Doug Ford's connection with Tim Hudak take down her biggest opponent. (You know, not that I want Wynne to win the next provincial election—I'm still hoping for Andrea Horwath to do something impressive.)

The latest on Ford's popularity and chances of re-election. Unchanged. The interesting thing is why it's unchanged, and what this says about the various factions of the wingnut right.

I know if my job title was consistently prefaced by the terms "embattled" and "scandal-plauged," I wouldn't go courting any additional controversy and I'd be out there trying to make friends. But then, I'm not Rob Ford. So he's once again decided not to go to Pride. Heh. Again, good.

Here's an article about yesterday's (poorly organized and disappointing) demo calling for Ford's resignation. Hopefully we can build up some momentum—after I've sold and distributed more t-shirts. And here are some photos from the demo. Both [livejournal.com profile] rbowspryte and I can be seen in some sporting said t-shirts.

I think that's about it. I don't think I posted Corey Charron's new track, "Smoking Crack With Rob Ford," so in case you haven't heard it yet, here it is:

sabotabby: (jetpack)
Oh you guys, you guys. I am so enjoying the explosion of pure nerd rage that has accompanied Chris Sprouse's decision to quit Adventures of Superman over the Orson Scott Card controversy. (You can read some of the butthurt* in the comments there and also in the BoingBoing post about it.

Now, Sprouse's actions, if you read his statement, are not particularly heroic—he's not quitting because OSC is a terrible human being with terrible views; he's quitting because of the "controversy" surrounding OSC's hiring. Hell, even if he quit over OSC's terrible views, it's hardly praiseworthy to not want to work for an actual bigot who plans to overthrow the government if gays get too many human rights. That's kind of called "baseline human decency." But in the white, male, straight-dominated world of mainstream comics, I'll take what I can get, and Sprouse has done right by deed, if not by word, making him far better of a person than the bigwigs at DC.

But to hear the nerds tell it, Sprouse, and the folks calling for a boycott of OSC's Superman run and/or the new Ender's Game movie are one step away from throwing all of the conservatives in gulags and forcing their political opponents to choose between death and mandatory butt sex. I keep seeing neckbeards screeching about freedom of speech, and how OSC's has somehow been denied.

Nerdy liberals are not helping much by pointing out that the problem is not that OSC has reprehensible beliefs, but that he sits on the board for the National Organization for Marriage and every penny you give him ends up benefiting an organization that has, as its sole raison d'être, the denial of civil liberties to gay people. I think this is because no one's read his recent books. One of my friends, who is approximately as nerdy as I am, didn't even know about his politics. I've read—well, parts of his recent books; to be honest, they're pretty unreadable—and the dude has an agenda that he can't keep out of his writing and that should be kept well away from Superman's spandex-clad buttocks, trust me. (He can't write a riff off Hamlet without working in ass-fucking.) So the issue is not just economic; it also has to do with OSC as a person and an artist. You shouldn't give him your money because he's awful.

The most hilarious bit is when the neckbeards compare the boycott campaign to McCarthyism (because OSC probably would argue that communists and fellow travellers ought to be shot in the face), suggesting that we, the nerd community, have an obligation to buy his media so that he can earn a living in the style to which he has become accustomed. Freedom, apparently, means an compulsory copy of Ender's Game and its sequels in every household. (Hey neckbeards who take this line: I'm a geek too! You are hereby obligated to help me maintain my paid LJ account; otherwise you're censoring me.)

Which—no. In a capitalist system, you are not guaranteed the right to earn a living in the profession of your choosing, even if you wrote a book a gazillion years ago that people liked a a lot. If you think this is unfair, let's talk! But unless you're proposing something revolutionary, OSC has no inherent right to not have his career destroyed over his repellent worldview.

Nor is he being "censored." OSC has every right to peddle his hateful shit on a soapbox, literally or metaphorically, without the government stepping in to jail him on charges of Aggravated Asshaberdashery. He's got a right to put his poisonous ideas down on paper without every copy of said paper getting burned or pulped. He even has the right to try and sell his raving bollocks to any publisher who will have him—but said publishers are just as free to say, "No, we do not believe your raving bollocks will sell," and we, as media consumers, are also free to say, "No, we will not buy your raving bollocks because we don't want our money going to NOM, and also because your writing sucks now." This is not censorship.

Let's briefly touch on the other argument I'm seeing a lot of, which is that an artist is separate from his political beliefs. As previously mentioned, OSC is not—both financially and in his inability to keep attacks on queers and leftists** out of his books. But let's just say he was not on the board of NOM and he was only writing books about little boys being unaware that they were committing genocide. I would still argue that his political beliefs are relevant. Look, I like all kinds of problematic art—my two favourite musical genres being opera and neo-folk—but the distinction between a geek-as-active-participant-in-media and a passive consumer at least ought to be, to some degree, critical engagement with said art. I can love Wagner, or T.S. Eliot, or Frank Miller†, or James Bond movies, or Chronicles of Narnia, despite the anti-Semitism, or Islamophobia, or misogyny, or blatant support for British imperialism inherent in the authors and/or work while still criticizing the politics they represent. If you feel a need to mindlessly defend an artist because you like their work, you are officially too dumb to play in geekdom.

Finally, to address the last defence I'm seeing, which is that anything he wrote is actually good. I'm going to piss a bunch of people off and say that, unless you're a bullied adolescent, Ender's Game is actually a bit crap, and if you're over the age of 16, you ought to see OSC for the naked emperor that he is. He's kind of a crap writer. Even if he was the greatest guy, I still wouldn't buy his books or comics because they're not that good. That's not a boycott or anything—it's just taste. If Ender's Game came out now you'd probably roll your eyes. Admit it.

I actually kind of feel sorry for OSC as a person, because I think his bigotry goes beyond simple bigotry well into the realm of mental illness. But that doesn't mean that anyone ought to indulge his delusions. He's got issues, but unfortunately those issues resonate with many theoretically sane, fascist-minded people hell-bent on oppressing anyone who's not like them, and he's got money and more of a platform to be heard than most spluttering lunatics do. For this reason, you should actually torrent Ender's Game rather than pay money to see it, if you feel the need to torture yourself by watching it, and you should totally boycott his run on Superman if it goes ahead. There are enough bigots in the world without you funding their bigotry.

* Probably a bad choice of words.

** See Empire. Or don't. It's awful; I got about 50 pages in before deciding it was too bad to even parody.

† Well, before he went to actual shit.
sabotabby: (lolmarx)
Photobucket

As of 2011, the population of Toronto was 2,615,060. So it's hardly a small town. However, it's run by a small-minded mayor, who doesn't seem to understand the consequences of his actions.

He announced that "everyone" was invited to his party. That's a dumb thing to do. Remember when this happened?

Well. Since he was "too busy" to come to Pride, the gays will be bringing Pride to him! (Hopefully in a big pink bus.)

Here's the Facebook group if you're interested in coming and need his address or directions. It's going to be fun times. I hear there will be pony rides.

Of course, he might not be mayor by then. I really hope he's an ex-mayor by then.

Squee!

May. 6th, 2012 12:04 am
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (iCom by starrypop)
Awesome show tonight: the premiere of Kids on TV's newest album/videos, Pantheon, at Harbourfront HATCH artists-in-residence series. I am going to make you all buy this album when it comes out in September because it is fantastic. I do love it when I can shamelessly plug my friends' music.

Here's their first single, "Bobby," about the secret love affair between Robert Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns. In addition to being catchy, this song also taught me something I didn't know about art history.



But anyway. Just wait until the Dazzler one comes out. And the cover of "Cloudbusting" by way of the Magnetic Fields. Incidentally, I didn't know what "Cloudbusting" was about before either, though I really should have.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (champagne anarchist)
Saw two movies at HotDocs tonight: The Man That Got Away and She Said Boom: The Story of Fifth Column The latter was the one I went to see, being one of those precocious suburban teenage punks who saw Erica Ehm interview Fifth Column on MuchMusic as part of a general drift into zines and mixtapes, but both films were actually pretty wonderful.

The Man That Got Away is not really a documentary as such other than being about a real person, the filmmaker's great-uncle Jimmy. It's a musical (with impressive original music and choreography). It follows Jimmy's life from his roots in rural Alberta to his brief career as a chorus boy in New York City, to his eventual drug-related death on the streets of Vancouver. In between, there's a stint in a sanatorium where he meets Judy Garland. The entire thing is played out in a downward spiral on the ramp of a parking garage in Edmonton. It's completely bizarre and beautifully made.

If you haven't heard of Fifth Column but are into La Tigre and Bikini Kill and all that feminist punk stuff, there is a gap in your musical history. Fifth Column were the band that started basically queercore (and got written out of the history of Riot Grrrl because they were just a little too anarchist and a lot too gay to be marketable back then), launched Bruce LaBruce's career, and burned rather explosively on Toronto's music scene for about fifteen minutes back in the day. GB Jones, the band's drummer, is also an experimental filmmaker, and the film makes excellent use of Super 8 footage as well as contemporary interviews with the band members. There's some particularly affecting imagery of Toronto from the late 80s to mid 90s that makes someone like me go, "I remember that," which is a cool bonus. But the main reason to see the film is its exploration of queer radical politics and history that is not so much unwritten as it is cut and photocopied and shoved into someone's basement in a milk crate.

At the end during the Q&A, an Irish woman got up and said how emotionally affected she was by the film, given how queer history is still so repressed back home. She said that she was turning 40 this year, and it was the first time she's seen a film with lesbians in it.

Oh, and I got to meet GB Jones, albeit briefly and I'm always a dork in these situations.

Anyway, I'd highly recommend both films if you get a chance to see them.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (pretty princess party)
It is! Time for the Annual Pride Controversy. The opening volley is yet another attempt to get the Honourable Wife-Beater to attend.

It's an unfortunate situation because, obviously, no one wants him there. I mean, you don't invite white supremacists to Caribana, or MRAs to International Women's Day. The Honourable Wife-Beater is a rampant homophobe who, quite literally, hates and fears gay people. It's one thing to have had Miller there, because he was a decent, normal human being who actually cared about the city, or Lastman, who was mainly just corrupt and quite a bit slow but not actually actively evil, but including someone in the parade, in a prominent position no less, who despises your very existence is, well, awkward.

But he's mayor, and it's part of his job to attend big events in the city, particularly events like Pride that bring in a lot of income and are popular with everyone except homophobes, claustrophobes, and people who actually live at Church and Wellesley and want to go to sleep at some point that weekend. So Pride is stuck with holding its nose and holding out an olive branch to ask the Honourable Wife-Beater to please do his job.

Apparently they even need to bribe him by relating it somehow to hockey, like he's a little kid who otherwise won't go near it for fear of getting gay germs on him or something. I can't wait to see what happens this year.

In related news, Wildrose is actually a thing? I really didn't think anyone took them seriously. Maybe it's just a slow news day in Alberta.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (socialism with a human face)
It’s history, you guys. Everyone dies at the end.

When last we left our antiheroes, everyone was pretty broken, but at least Blunt’s relationship with the scum-sucking parasites had made them safe. All it would take was one hint of an accusation of less then complete loyalty, and Blunt could produce the photos demonstrating that the beloved Royal Family tree was harbouring some Nazis in its twisted and inbred branches.

But how safe are they? Obviously they didn’t completely get away with it, or you wouldn’t be watching/reading about this miniseries.

the thrilling conclusion )

Final verdict: Actually better than I remembered and you should all watch it. Now it's back to watching Babylon 5 and perhaps blogging about some things that aren't TV for a change.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (socialism with a human face)
After the sobfest that was the last episode, you’ll be happy to know that this one’s a little more cheerful. There’s only a miscarriage, an assassination, the complete loss of all innocence, and lots and lots of dead Russians.

Mawwiage )

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 23 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Jun. 5th, 2025 03:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags