sabotabby: two lisa frank style kittens with a zizek quote (trash can of ideology)
I’m having a hard time right now. We are all having a hard time. You all know what my preferred coping mechanism is for that? An easy dunk. And what is an easier dunk than a new Left Behind movie? If only there were a SECRET FUCKING LEFT BEHIND MOVIE THAT I HAD NEVER HEARD OF WTF???? I discovered this a few days ago and my friends, it’s as if you had told me that they just discovered a new fragment of the Epic of Gilgamesh, or the world’s tiniest frog. I am full of joy and the Lord.

Wait, how are there more Left Behind movies? I thought I had seen all the Left Behind movies! But apparently there was one made in 2017 that must have gone straight to YouTube, and you are never going to guess who produced it. No, really, I’m leaving this as a mystery because you are going to LOSE YOUR SHIT. (This joke is going to be extremely funny to you in about 5 minutes, depending on your reading speed.)


It’s loosely adapted from the spinoff series The Kids, which is Left Behind For the Teens, and is a blatant attempt to cash in, several years too late, on the whole YA post-apocalyptic craze. It even stars several people from Teen Wolf! (Disappointingly, not any of the characters I remember.)


Okay, the other disappointing news is that this is the best Left Behind adaptation to date, which is not saying very much. Because it’s not based on the main series, we don’t have to deal with the worst characters in fiction, and our young protagonists are free to be massively more likable people than Rayford Steele or Buck Williams. Which is to say they get to be protagonists instead of merely enabling the villain. The Jesus/Revelations stuff is definitely backgrounded, so most of the film has to do with running around in forests, which is harder, though not impossible as we’ll see, to fuck up. Which is not to say it’s a good movie (I promise that in fact it is a really terrible movie), just that it avoids so many of the pitfalls of both the books and earlier films that it’s almost shocking.


If you’re interested in some gossipy inside baseball, the reason why it’s better has something to do with the lawsuit between Cloud Ten and Tim LaHaye, who famously hated the Cloud Ten/Namesake movies. LaHaye was basically dying during this production, which was led by his grandson, Randy LaHaye. Randy wanted to make a film that Tim would be proud of, and he did it with a series of sketchy investment companies that only appear to exist to make films like this. They still did a better job than Cloud Ten, which is an incredibly low bar.


Let’s get to it!

apocalypse time! )
sabotabby: (books!)
 Consuming media is not the same as activism. That said.

Yesterday, I went to see a screening of Where Olive Trees Weep. If you haven't seen it or there's not a screening near you, you can PWYC on the internet. It's about Palestinians, trauma, and resistance, focusing primarily on journalist, activist, and therapist Ashira Darwish, with appearances from Dr. Gabor Maté, Amira Hass, and Ahed Tamimi. It's beautifully shot and compassionately written and edited.

The hardest thing about the film is that it was shot in 2022. You know. Before things got as bad as they are now. And yet it's still unbearable to see.

Then today I saw Omar El Akkad speak on his new book, One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This. Which I haven't read yet, but I've read a bunch of his articles and American War, all of which I loved. I go to a lot of readings and this one was probably the best. He's quiet and self-effacing, like he is rather surprised to find himself in front of a microphone speaking at the first of two sold-out events. And every word out of his mouth is just the most insightful, thoughtful thing you've heard anyone say. I can't wait to read this book and I already know that I'll weep big ugly tears.

Anyway. There's two things to check out, but then you (and I) have to go do something.
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)
I don't even know what to say. I was an Art Kid in the 90s; his influence on who I am and how I think cannot be overstated.

I hear that the wildfires may have played a role in his death and I am even more livid.

sabotabby: plain text icon that says first as shitpost, second as farce (shitpost)

My dear readers, the world is a fuck and things have all been very difficult lately, and you deserve what we all deserve.


An easy dunk.


Today I announce the triumphant return of Cheatsheet Of Freedom, in which I watch terrible (and, occasionally, surprisingly good) films so that you don’t have to. Basically, like Jesus Christ, I sacrifice myself on the cross of terrible screenwriting, piss-poor acting, and failures of camerawork, so that you, gentle reader, can be spared the worst cinematic horrors of our time.


And it is with joy that I approach this latest installment, because there is another Left Behind movie! That’s right! To no applause last year, a production company which I shall not yet name because the name itself is incredibly funny, helmed by one Kevin Sorbo (you know, the Hercules guy who now can’t get work, unless you count “being pwned by Xena Warrior Princess on Twitter” as work), produced a new Left Behind. Filmed in Calgary, Alberta, no less.


If you’re just tuning in and are a normal person who hasn’t spent the last two decades spelunking in the worst parts of the internet, you may be asking, “what exactly is Left Behind?”


The short version is, it’s a far-right Christian paranoid fever dream about all of the True Christians (along with every child and fetus under the age of 12) getting Raptured, condemning everyone else to seven years of hell on Earth before Jesus shows up and smites everyone with his laser beam eyes. Our quote-unquote protagonists realize what’s happening, say the magic words to convert to the exact right type of Christianity, and team up to form a Tribulation Force to fight the Antichrist, who is a Romanian politician named after a mountain range. There are seven main books in the series, too many spin-offs to count, and now five movies, three, based on the first three books, starring Kirk Cameron of Growing Pains fame, followed by an attempted reboot in 2014, and now this one.


Some context is needed here. You see, I was terribly confused by this, because it’s framed as a reboot of the series with a brand-new cast. However, it is not a reboot—it is a sequel to the 2014 Left Behind movie starring Nicholas Cage. That movie is a garbage piece of shit that repackaged the story as an action movie instead of a theological treatise, which is a problem not because I agree with the garbage theology but because that’s all it is, and if you take out the Jesus stuff, all you get is a lot of travel planning and people talking on cellphones. No one acts like a person. It spends the whole time on the plane with pilot Rayford Steele trying to land the plane while investigative reporter Buck Williams flaps about, and I really don’t remember it all that well. If I’d been in charge, I would have gone further in the plot and cast Nic Cage as Nicolae Carpathia instead of Rayford Steele and it would have been a better movie for it.


So this sequel, while titled after the third book, Nicolae: Rise of the Antichrist (spoilers, I guess), is actually an adaptation of the second half of the first book, Left Behind. Still following along? Great!


A little personal history. I first became obsessed with these books when I read Fred Clark/Slacktivist’s reviews of them. 14/10, no notes. I cannot recommend these reviews enough. You will learn more about storytelling, theology, and media criticism from them than you will learn from any number of university courses. I honestly think if there is a god, Fred Clark is doing their work here on Earth.


Of course I have seen all the movies and have strong opinions on them and the relative strengths of the adaptations. If you’re interested in my thoughts on most of the other ones, just go ahead and click the “left behind” tag. You may be surprised if you’re just joining me now that there are actually things I appreciate in the films. The books are a hot flaming dumpster fire but occasionally, you get these little bits where a filmmaker or an actor or a cinematographer will try to actually make a watchable movie out of them. An example is Brad Johnson (the first Rayford Steele) in the first one, who does his job as best he can even though the script is terrible. He gives an emotional performance where there is no emotion on the page. So I will at times weigh in on things in this movie that are less bad than they otherwise might have been. I appreciate the story on the level of unintentional humour—they are terrible, they are unaware that they are terrible, and I enjoy making fun of them to a truly Luciferian degree.

You are not ready )

Please join us next time for dizzying shifts of genre, the worst character in this whole series, and of course, lots of scenes where people Google things on cellphones.
sabotabby: two lisa frank style kittens with a zizek quote (trash can of ideology)
 Well, this will be quick and easy, as I only saw three new films this year, and one of them sucked. I don't know why I can mainline a million TV shows and not watch a single movie, but I think it's because I can only really sit still for an hour at a time. Anyway, the three whole movies I saw were:

El Conde: This is the one that sucked, unfortunately. You would think the premise was bulletproof: Pinochet is actually a vampire and gets dragged out of retirement even though he wants to die. That's ripe for political satire. This film has two problems. First, the characterization is muddled and so the satire is muddled. I think it wants to show some nuance and complexity and how fascism can appeal to even those who oppose it, plus the obvious vampirism = capitalism, but it ended up mired in pointless nihilism. Sometimes you have to be blatant in your satire. The other problem is that it's told almost entirely in voiceover narration. It's a stupid choice that's not justified once you realize who the voiceover is, which is also not a big twist. In some alternate timeline there is a good version of this.

Nimona: I liked this one quite a lot! I'm not a big cartoon fan, and I'm particularly not a fan of this particular cartoon style, but the story is good enough to overcome my aesthetic dislike. It's good for all the same reasons why the comic is good—it's a cute, subversive, queer fairy tale with memorable characters. My only issues were that I would prefer it if it were animated more like ND Stevenson's drawing style, because I like that more, and that I don't think the changes at the beginning work as well as the comic does. It's far more fun to discover Ballister Blackheart's backstory as Nimona does—this is one case where I think the story benefits from doing an obvious twist. It ends up softening the story quite a lot by not depicting any of Blackheart's villainy, though I guess that makes it more appropriate for the kiddies. I guess.

Cocaine Bear: Okay I can't believe I'm saying this but this ended up being the best movie I saw in 2023 because unlike the other two, it didn't have any flaws. It made us a promise—you get to see a bear on cocaine that kills a lot of people—and delivered exactly that. It's a massively self-aware film. It's hilarious. Sometimes all you want is to watch a bear that is higher than any living thing has ever gotten in existence eat a bunch of people and then try to get more cocaine. Unlike the other two it is an improvement over reality/the source material, as the actual story behind this is sad rather than funny.

I'll try to watch more movies next year. The key word is "try."
sabotabby: plain text icon that says first as shitpost, second as farce (shitpost)
 Today's podcast rec is "Everything Everywhere All At Once and the Asian American Family," on It Could Happen Here. I'm highlighting it because 1) it's a take I haven't seen anywhere else and I happen to agree, and 2) it's just an excellent piece of media criticism of the sort that I don't see enough. Mia chats with filmmaker Tiffany Yang about the film and where it's positioned more generally within Asian American cinema and culture. They are both Asian American and I am obviously not, and they do a good job of exploring nuances that I'm either unaware of or did not realize was a thing.

First of all, we all liked the movie. My initial impressions were that its reach exceeded its grasp and it was overlong, which I don't really object to, and that it didn't land the ending, which I do object to. But why? I saw it a second time and liked it a lot more, but I still felt the ending was kind of unearned. Its Oscar sweep and Michelle Yeoh and Ke Huy Quan finally getting the recognition they richly deserve is something we should all truly celebrate. Mia talks about how the character of Joy was the closest she's ever come to seeing herself on screen. And I don't think that any critique can take away from how important all of that is.

But we can also critique things we like, can't we? The problem with media criticism on the internet is that it so often boils down to Thing Good or Thing Bad with zero analysis or nuance. So when I see a piece like this that genuinely appreciates a work while picking it apart, the film critic in me goes absolutely bonkers with joy.

Mia describes it as the best version of the only type of film Asian American filmmakers seem allowed to make. Which, once you see the pattern, is impossible to avoid. There's a family struggling to run a small business that's in financial trouble. They struggle to assimilate into American society. There is intergenerational tensions. That tension is resolved, and the family is reconciled. No other story is allowed to be told, and the class positionality is very specific. Tiffany points out the difference between the film and book versions of Crazy Rich Asians; in the book, the family is not reconciled, and they change it for the film, because no other story is allowed to be told. She also references some filmmakers who tell other types of stories but these are not considered Asian American Films (TM), which is fascinating to me.

The most interesting element of it is the discussion of queerness, because I keep seeing EEAAO described as "queer joy" and like. It isn't? to me? Like it struck me how remarkably sexless the relationship was between Joy and her girlfriend, how that relationship only exists as a point of tension between Joy and Evelyn. But Mia and Tiffany go deeper, talking about the generational trauma that is glossed over by the film's resolution, the way in which the trauma to older generations must always supersede the trauma that parents and grandparents do to their children, the ways in which queerness is always framed as Other (note that both of the queer relationships depicted in the film are between Chinese characters and white/white-passing characters), and most of all, the fact that it's not anything intrinsic to Joy and her queerness that Evelyn embraces at the end, but the sheer fact of biological relation. Which is often just not enough.

They also talk about the role of the Elder in Asian American political discourse, and how it gets conflated with, say, Indigenous ideas of the Elder but is fundamentally different. There's a dovetail here with the concept of family abolition, which they suggest but don't explore, and I am absolutely dying to discuss this with the family abolition academic I know (who, incidentally, loved the film).

Anyway, I enjoyed the absolute hell out of this analysis and it made me really excited to talk about film again. 
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)
 As in previous years, I didn't watch a ton of movies, but there were a few notable films, including one standout last-minute entry.

Everything Everywhere All At Once: I don't have a lot to say about this one. If you like that kind of thing, you've probably seen it a million times. Personally I found it bloated and overlong, with a troublingly uneven tone that held some nasty implications about fatphobia and mental illness. But on the plus side it had a lot of Michelle Yeoh, and I will take an ambitious hot mess over the vastly inferior Marvel equivalent, Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness, which was shit other than every moment that Wong was on screen.

Day Shift: This was a movie I did not actually expect to be any good at all, and that I forced my friends to watch after we watched The Invitation (which was also a 2022 movie about vampires and race and class, and also highly enjoyable) for two reasons, and two reasons only. There is a third, and a fourth, unconfirmed reason to watch it, but let's talk about the movie first. It stars Jamie Foxx as a down-on-his luck vampire hunter who must re-ingratiate himself with the vampire hunting union so that he can get enough money to pay for his daughter's braces before his wife leaves him. The first reason to see it is that the union that organizes the vampire hunters is the IWW. It's really a blink-and-you-miss-it cameo but if you think the online left cares that it's only there for a split second, you haven't met the online left. The second reason is that one of the other vampire hunters is played by Snoop Dogg, who is absolutely hilarious in it. Anyway turns out it's good, actually? The vampires' evil plan is gentrification and it's part of a growing number of horror movies, and vampire movies in particular, that have working class Black leads and monsters that are metaphors for white supremacy and capitalism. The third reason to see it is that the soundtrack slaps. The fourth, unconfirmed reason is that apparently it's an adaptation of Night Watch and Day Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko, which I enjoyed in their translated and subtitled versions respectively. At the very least, it shares the bonkers sensibility of "let's play urban fantasy tropes completely straight."

RRR: This was, up until last night, going to be my movie of the year. It's a Tollywood (Telegu language) movie that's an absolute fucking masterpiece. Before I get too far in, there are some problematic politics about it that would probably be better analyzed by someone who is actually from India. I'm coming at this with as a white Westerner who knows slightly more about the early Indian Independence movement than the average white Westerner because I read some really horribly translated Marxist books about it.

Anyway, RRR is about two revolutionaries, Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem, who never met in real life and did not actually have superpowers and also never demolished the British in a dance-off in the 1920s. But look. It would have been better if they had. You know it would have been. There are musical numbers and CGI animals and imperialists get absolutely pwned and it's a delight that's manages to get some solid politics and heartfelt drama into a spectacle of a movie that is relentlessly entertaining for its entire 182-minute run time. Both of the leads are charming as all fuck. There's even a shout-out to my favourite Indian revolutionary, Bhagat Singh, at the very end.*

So that was going to be my pick as best movie of the year but yesterday I saw Women Talking, which is going to live rent-free in my head for the rest of my life.

I haven't read the Miriam Toews book that it's based on but I've read some other work by her, and Sarah Polley is a hell of a director so I went into it with no idea what it was about but figuring it would be great just based on who was attached to the project. Given the bleakness of the subject matter, the title almost feels like a bit of a joke or at least a play on the Bechdel-Wallace Test. Which, obviously, it passes with flying colours; there are two men with speaking roles in the film and they're both confined to the margins of the narrative for different reasons.

The film takes place on an isolated Mennonite colony in 2010. The women of the colony learn that for years, their husbands, brothers, and sons have been drugging them and violently sexually assaulting them in the middle of the night. The elders of the community not only participate in the coverup, but eventually take almost all of the men to town to post bail for the attackers and insist that the women forgive them. The only men left behind are the schoolteacher, who has only recently returned to the colony after his family was exiled, and a trans man who is in charge of supervising the children.

In the absence of the men, the women vote on a course of action with three options: do nothing, stay and fight, and leave. Doing nothing is ruled out by almost all of the women, but staying and fighting and leaving are tied. Two extended families are appointed to debate between the remaining options, while the schoolteacher takes minutes because none of the women can read or write.

What follows is nearly all dialogue and silences, which nonetheless manages to be visually captivating as well thanks to Polley's direction, the incredible acting, and an understated, heartwrenching soundtrack. The debate encompasses faith and theology, pacifism and nonviolent resistance, family, and female solidarity. The subtle use of light creates a gripping tension and urgency—the autumn day never feels long enough to grapple with the enormities facing these women. Every character is beautifully brought to life with a compelling viewpoint and poetic dialogue. And if you thought "Daydream Believer" was not a song that could ever bring you to tears, well.

This is one that was worth seeing in theatres because the cinematography is jaw-dropping, and worth watching multiple times because there are layers upon layers in a film that's 95% a group of women having a debate in a hay loft. Utterly brilliant.

* What's that you say? Not everyone has a favourite Indian revolutionary? What's wrong with you people?
sabotabby: astronaut cat wielding a hammer and sickle (cat space union)
 After a round of internet arguments (not on DW, elsewhere) I am left to conclude that the two major problems of pop cultural criticism are 1) A Modest Proposal is no longer taught in schools*, and 2) no one on the online left has actually read as much Bertolt Brecht as they claim to, if any at all.

I am happy to elaborate in comments.

* I am generally in favour of replacing Dead White Guy Literature in the compulsory high school canon but A Modest Proposal is my one exception. I am open to replacements and expansions for it, particularly by First Nations, Métis, or Inuit authors. Walking Eagle News is great and I absolutely plan to use it.
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)
 Late addendum to my film roundup post

Don't Look Up was absolutely my favourite film of 2021 and one of the best films I've seen in ages. I will be happy to take questions at the appropriate time.
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)
 I guess I better start these, huh? It is, after all, a tradition.

I'll start with the shortest one: Film. I don't watch a lot of movies at the best of times, and while other people felt like sitting in a cinema for 3 hours in a mask with strangers who are not necessarily wearing masks sounds like a good time, I am not one of those people. Accordingly, I saw two new films with other people, both at the drive-in, and one new-ish film on my own. According to my calendar, there was also one of our online Charlize Theron-a-thons in 2021, though I don't remember which of the films we watched. That might have actually been it? I don't know. 2021 is a blur.

The new and new-ish films I saw were:

Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings: This was the first movie I saw in two years with other people in person, with popcorn and everything! So it's always going to be associated with the brief period where things were actually looking up. I really enjoyed it beyond that, though—it is basically a Marvel formula movie but with some important twists: a primarily POC cast, the female lead not being the love interest, and the origin story elements minimized. It was also quite funny, and the special effects were excellent in a way that enhanced the narrative rather than felt like filler. Also Simu Liu is a local guy and we stan him. I didn't know Michelle Yeoh was going to be in it either and I actually squealed out loud when she turned up.

The Eternals: I also saw this one at the drive-in, except in this case it was more about "omg I get to see another movie" than coming away with the sense that it was any good. It definitely had good moments and I appreciate its ambition, but I felt that its reach exceeded its grasp. What was irritating for me was that it pushed back at some of the things I dislike about superhero movies and teased at subversion but then left it alone. It raised issues that I wanted to see explored more in superhero/fantasy movies, like "why do hugely powerful characters waste so much time stopping crime when they could end the climate crisis," but the constraints of the Marvel Formula and Hollywood economics meant that they couldn't explore them, by, say, having the Eternals and the Deviants band together to overthrow the gods, or even by suggesting that the steam engine is responsible for a good lot of our problems.

Additionally, I'm not sure it's possible to make a movie in which aliens nudge human civilization forward without it being racist, even if those aliens are played by BIPOC actors. It sure was pretty, though.

Blood Quantum: This was objectively the best movie I saw in 2021. It came out in 2019 though. It's by Jeff Barnaby so it's gory as fuck and Problematic. Set on a Mik'maq reservation, it's about a zombie plague where Indigenous people are immune to zombification (but can still be eaten by them). A group of white survivors take refuge in Red Crow's fortress, and predictable horror ensues.

Zombie movies are best when they tackle real world politics, and this has it in droves. The zombie plague brings up not just genocide through disease, but the complex politics of multiracial identity, generational trauma, and gender politics. It's also wonderfully inventive, with stunning animated sequences and memorable characters, with particularly outstanding performances by Michael Greyeyes, Elle-Máijá Tailfeathers, and Stonehorse Lone Goeman.

Winter break is traditionally my time to watch movies, so I'll probably see a few more (like Dune) this week. In lieu of me having anything to say about them, enjoy this article from the Jacobin about why movies suck now.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
Non-spoilery review:

The problem with Star Wars* as a franchise and this Star War in particular is that it attempts to marry fundamentally incompatible conceptions of duality in Eastern and Western philosophy. Balancing the Force makes sense if the Light Side and Dark Side are, respectively, order vs. chaos, or collective good vs. individual will. But not if they're good vs. evil or, in this case, Space Nazis vs. Not Space Nazis. Ironically this is the one thing the prequels did right.

But they didn't do that because you need to sell toys. Of Space Nazis.

* The movies. I know nothing about the EU or the video games or whatever.
sabotabby: (anarcat)
Hey, it's only, like, several months late.

I really enjoyed it, mainly owing to Joaquin Phoenix and Frances Conroy absolutely killing it on the acting front. But I have never wanted to edit a movie so badly in my life because it was so close to being perfect and argh.

spoilers for a movie you've either seen or don't care about )
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
This is going to be really short because it was the kind of year where I barely saw any movies. Which sucks, given what I do for a living. And most of the ones I saw weren't good enough to talk about. Here are the ones that were.

El Camino: This movie really didn't need to exist. It is 100% fanservice. The ending to Breaking Bad was perfect. We didn't need a movie sequel, as such.

So? It was more Jesse. It was two more hours of Breaking Bad, beautiful cinematography of Albuquerque, witty dialogue, dark humour, and things going horribly, horribly wrong. I loved every second of it. It didn't need to happen but I was glad it happened and the fact that something is not, strictly speaking, necessary, does not stop it from being good.

Deadwood the Movie: This, conversely, did need to happen, because I have waited a fucking decade for the end of my favourite TV show of all time. (Yes, most of the characters are historical figures. Yes, you can look up what happened to them. No, it doesn't matter, because the historical Calamity Jane is not the fictionalized Calamity Jane, and Joanie wasn't a real person, so Wikipedia is not going to tell me that they lived happily ever after.) 

The movie isn't perfect—there are a lot of flashbacks that I found quite unnecessary, as no one is going to watch this movie without having seen the show first, and I felt that they interrupted the narrative flow—but it's a fitting resolution to the story. And it had me in tears, both because it was just so awesome to revisit that world again, but because the primary plot, Al Swearengen's slow, poetic reckoning with mortality, comes out of writer David Milch's Alzheimer's diagnosis. This is, presumably, one of the last things he'll write, and it's absolutely gorgeous. 

Us: I am still kind of making sense of Us. It's not a straightforward allegory like Get Out was; it implies politics rather than outright stating them. It's creepy and atmospheric and Lupita Nyong'o is brilliant in it. I saw the twist coming a mile away, but I don't think that affected how disturbed I was by the whole thing.

Jojo Rabbit: One of the few movies I cared enough about to see in theatres because it is everyone's moral obligation to ensure that Taika Waititi makes lots of money and continues to get his weird ideas greenlit. This was the movie Life Is Beautiful didn't have the balls to be. It's also something that resonated deeply with me, as I see more and more young people seduced into fascist ideology. It's a story about how ordinary people can be warped into hatred, but critically, it offers a pathway out of that hatred, even though it comes at a terrible cost.

I'll probably see one or two other movies before the year is out—Christmas break being one of those times that I can actually go out and see films—so lemme know if you see anything good.

sabotabby: swift wind from she-ra (swift wind)
Despite the fact that I'm pretty much exhausted all the time, I managed to do stuff:

Thursday, I went with some friends to see Us. Which I loved. A lot more opaque than Get Out, Peele's first film, but that just means that I get to methodically go through all of the thinkpieces in an attempt to figure out the symbolism. Lupita Nyong'o' is so incredible. Go see it if you haven't and then come back here and talk to me about it. I probably need to watch it again b/c I'm not much of a horror movie person, so there were parts where I was just busy being scared and probably missed things.

Friday I got invited to a thing but ended up crashing out and watching telly. I have Opinions about the latest episodes of Disco and The Magicians.

Saturday, I went to see Orville Peck. On the subway on the way to meet my friend, there was a group of teenage girls sitting beside me. One of them asked if they were getting off at Christie Station, "as in the Christie Pits Riot" and another one said "I know all about that!" and they fistbumped. The kids are all right.

Orville Peck is amazing, though the sound at the show did him no favours, at least from where we were standing. (Ran into another friend after and she said that the vocals were more distinct from the opposite side.) Less of a problem for me because I've been listening to the album non-stop since it came out and thus know how the songs are supposed to sound, but my friend hadn't so that bothered her more. Great performance, though. If you haven't heard him, picture Chris Isaak and Roy Orbison giving each other handjobs in a truck stop, only in musical form, and sung by a sexy lamp.

56837314_10161543071365612_2994748552242003968_n
Oh, you think I'm kidding about the lamp thing? I am not.

This is what I'm talking about:



This is my favourite song off the album, which sadly doesn't have a weird music video to go with it:



Truly we live in a blessed time for WTF music.
sabotabby: picture of M'Baku from Black Panther, "Just kidding, we're vegetarians." (m'baku)
 This shall be very brief, as I don't get to the movies often and besides, there were only three movies released this year that mattered. (In fairness, I have not yet seen 2.0, which would almost certainly merit inclusion here.) They are as follows:

Black Panther

Hands down the best superhero movie of...ever, I think. It redefined the types of stories a blockbuster Hollywood action flick could tell, it had interesting, multilayered politics, compelling characters, gorgeous Afrofuturist-inspired visuals, and a kick ass soundtrack. You probably already saw it three times like I did.

The Death Of Stalin

Technically this came out in 2017 but didn't hit theatres here until 2018, so it totally counts. It's The Thick Of It but in the Soviet Union (ostensibly; like anything Armando Iannucci does, it's more about British politics than anything else) and it's about as pitch black as a comedy can get. Everyone is fucking terrible but some people are really, really terrible, and some people are merely terrible in ways that are entertaining. Which is, ngl, exactly the kind of humour I find most hilarious because I'm a bad person.

And the best movie of 2018 was...

Sorry To Bother You

Boots Riley's directorial debut is brilliant, funny, and political without ever getting didactic. The story of a black telemarketer who rises up through the corporate ranks owing to a magical ability to sound white on the phone starts out as one type of story, pulls the rug out from under you, and veers in an entirely weirder direction. Its only flaws are 1) I thought the ending was a little too long, and 2) I am really afraid that the Elon Musks and Jeff Bezoses of the world might watch it and get ideas. But it captures the zeitgeist in a way that's simultaneously chilling and hilarious as anything.

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 23 45
678 910 1112
131415 1617 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 12:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags