Things you should know about.
Sep. 5th, 2009 10:41 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sabotabbyVia ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
hayleysaurusrex, an interesting, if nonsensical creationist page about vestigial organs. I do not understand any of this as it is clearly written by moon people or something, but look how awesome evolution is compared to creationism:
That's right, you godless heathens! Evolution will give you a face like Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean and eye-nipples.
Wait, why is this a problem? Evolution is badass.
roter_terror, who also posted an excellent analysis of capitalism and health care, also informed the internets about a BBC miniseries called the Fall of Eagles, which reportedly stars Patrick Stewart as Lenin.
Evidence:
I clearly need to see this, like, yesterday.
hayleysaurusrex, an interesting, if nonsensical creationist page about vestigial organs. I do not understand any of this as it is clearly written by moon people or something, but look how awesome evolution is compared to creationism:That's right, you godless heathens! Evolution will give you a face like Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean and eye-nipples.
Wait, why is this a problem? Evolution is badass.
roter_terror, who also posted an excellent analysis of capitalism and health care, also informed the internets about a BBC miniseries called the Fall of Eagles, which reportedly stars Patrick Stewart as Lenin.Evidence:
I clearly need to see this, like, yesterday.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 02:51 pm (UTC)Is it basically saying that if evolution was correct, people would look like the mutant on the right? Or, in other words, "if things weren't how they are now, they'd be some other way" ...? I like it when creationists make that argument.
If that's what it's even saying! I can't really tell.
Man, that series looks good, if it indeed it's Stewart as Lenin.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 02:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 02:54 pm (UTC)How come they have Evolution Man mixed up with one of the Great Old Ones? It's the tentacles that gives it away.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 02:56 pm (UTC)Clearly, I need to see this.
How come they have Evolution Man mixed up with one of the Great Old Ones? It's the tentacles that gives it away.
I wouldn't imagine that crazy fundagelicals are too into Lovecraft, but I've been surprised before.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:04 pm (UTC)MAAAAAAAAAAAD!
Patrick Stewart as Lenin is Hawt, almost as Hawt as Geoffrey Rush as Trotsky in "Frida".
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:08 pm (UTC)He's too late.
I'm one of the few heterosexual women in the universe who doesn't find Patrick Stewart, in any role, hawt. What's wrong with me?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 04:09 pm (UTC)http://absinthetic.etsy.com
(pre-sale ends Monday night, so tell your friends!)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:lenin
Date: 2009-09-05 03:30 pm (UTC)Re: lenin
Date: 2009-09-05 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 04:47 pm (UTC)I saw a guy who looked like James Dean yesterday. Well, more like was dressed like James Dean with really scraggly facial hair. It was hilarious.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 05:59 pm (UTC)They don't seem to have explained the purpose of the created man's nipples or autumnal leaves, nor his little toes.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 08:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 08:18 pm (UTC)the fact that this person exists is proof of evolution from lower life forms and those "useless", "pointless", "senseless" tags should be affixed to a photo of the author.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 08:57 pm (UTC)Clearly, the author is superior to both of us.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 08:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 10:00 pm (UTC)But seriously, I'm pretty sure "Just Because" describes creationism far better than evolution. Only Nuwaubianism and the belief that Dolphins came from Sirius/that autistic children are just dolphins in human form exceed that kind of creationism in stupidity.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 10:53 pm (UTC)i also see no mention of the appendix on that site, which is a pretty blatant vestigal organ...
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 11:36 pm (UTC)Holy shit!!! I'm excited already.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-06 03:04 am (UTC)