Ken Loach is my homeboy
Apr. 20th, 2007 10:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I just saw The Wind That Shakes the Barley. It's utterly awesome. I mean, it suffers a bit from Ken Loach's anviliciousness at the beginning, but it more than makes up for it in other ways.
"Our freedom must be had at all hazards. If the men of property will not help us they must fall; we will free ourselves by the aid of that large and respectable class of the community - the men of no property." - James Connolly
Essentially, it's a story of how revolutionary struggle can go very wrong. Loach himself, I gather, sympathizes with the anti-Treaty Republicans as the heirs of Connolly et al., but he characterizes their fight as impossibly idealistic, and makes the National Army no less sympathetic. By the end, there are no heroes, no villains, and no right answers—just a tragic march to an inevitable conclusion. It's a beautiful mediation on the politics of compromise, and one can see its echoes in contemporary political debates (as Fred Clark mentions in his post on Rwanda).
One one level, it's a straight-up condemnation of ruling class interests betraying working class interests within a nationalist war, and the limits of class collaboration, etc. But on another level, it forces you to wonder about what the alternative would be. And it's rather bleak in the latter respect, but I have to hand it to Loach for asking hard questions. It's the sort of movie that I wish every black bloc, more-radical-than-thou type would watch before opining on various national liberation movements. Because sometimes it's just that imperfect and messy and ugly, and Loach does a lovely job of conveying that, and of keeping rather sophisticated political questions very grounded in humanism.
Anyone else seen it yet?
In unrelated news, click here for a photo of what appears to be a three-way brawl between neo-Nazi Paul Fromm, members of the fascist JDL, and a cop that happened yesterday morning. I wish I'd been there. With popcorn.
"Our freedom must be had at all hazards. If the men of property will not help us they must fall; we will free ourselves by the aid of that large and respectable class of the community - the men of no property." - James Connolly
Essentially, it's a story of how revolutionary struggle can go very wrong. Loach himself, I gather, sympathizes with the anti-Treaty Republicans as the heirs of Connolly et al., but he characterizes their fight as impossibly idealistic, and makes the National Army no less sympathetic. By the end, there are no heroes, no villains, and no right answers—just a tragic march to an inevitable conclusion. It's a beautiful mediation on the politics of compromise, and one can see its echoes in contemporary political debates (as Fred Clark mentions in his post on Rwanda).
One one level, it's a straight-up condemnation of ruling class interests betraying working class interests within a nationalist war, and the limits of class collaboration, etc. But on another level, it forces you to wonder about what the alternative would be. And it's rather bleak in the latter respect, but I have to hand it to Loach for asking hard questions. It's the sort of movie that I wish every black bloc, more-radical-than-thou type would watch before opining on various national liberation movements. Because sometimes it's just that imperfect and messy and ugly, and Loach does a lovely job of conveying that, and of keeping rather sophisticated political questions very grounded in humanism.
Anyone else seen it yet?
In unrelated news, click here for a photo of what appears to be a three-way brawl between neo-Nazi Paul Fromm, members of the fascist JDL, and a cop that happened yesterday morning. I wish I'd been there. With popcorn.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:00 am (UTC)Have you seen his film on the Spanish Civil War? I'm going to see that soon, I reckon.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:18 pm (UTC)Land and Freedom is fantastic.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 07:21 pm (UTC)I am ashamed...
Date: 2007-04-21 04:42 am (UTC)to admit it, but I still have not seen that film. I get e-mail from Sinn Fein asking me when I'm going to do so... and I give no response.
Re: I am ashamed...
Date: 2007-04-21 04:19 pm (UTC)Re: I am ashamed...
Date: 2007-04-21 10:44 pm (UTC)Oh lord, I don't have to. I can tell you that they loved it! Sending me e-mails telling me to go buy the movie immediately in the Sinn Fein bookstore
Seriously, there is a great deal of appreciation for a movie that tells the story straight---Neil Jordan did not do so with "Michael Collins," though I, at least, appreciate his attempt.
Re: I am ashamed...
Date: 2007-04-22 04:53 pm (UTC)Re: I am ashamed...
Date: 2007-04-22 04:59 pm (UTC)I still enjoy the film---I watch it every year sometime between St. Pat's Day and Easter, the bottle of Jameson's or John Power & Sons at my side---despite the numerous historical errors (Dev, for example, made mistakes, but he was in no way complicit in the murder of the Big Fellow), and the presence of Julia Roberts (!).
But, the plain truth is Neil Jordan is no Ken Loach.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 05:27 am (UTC)The one student there appears to be wearing a "Hollister" sweatshirt. Now, Hollister purports to be an old-school, dyed-in-the-wool southern california surf company. But this dude is in what, Ontario?
Maybe I was just hideously unobservant in my nine years there, but while I lived in Southern California I NEVER saw anyone wearing this stuff. I didn't see anyone wearing Hollister until I came back east. Even on my recent return visits to Southern Cal, I've only seen a very few people wearing it, and they were probably tourists trying to fit in.
Can anyone confirm or dispel my suspicions of total, eggregious poserdom on the part of this company?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 06:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 10:50 am (UTC)I did however find a copy of it on VHS for a dollar, which would be awesome if I had a VHS player. Since I do not, I would be happy to send it your way, if you like. If you find a copy on DVD and have a burner, you'll know how to repay the favour :)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 09:42 am (UTC)I tend to the view that Collins took what he could get when he could get it, but I don't really have a detailed knowledge of the situation at the time, so I won't pontificate on that one. :)
On a tangent, the Michael Collins song by the Wolftones (on the disc you sent me), there's a line that goes (at least according to all the lyrics sites) "Oh when will the young men a sad lesson spurn, that brother and brother they never should turn". That doesn't make sense. Surely it should be either "a sad lesson learn" or "Why do the young men a sad lesson spurn"? Ah well, song lyrics often fail to make sense.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:23 pm (UTC)Wolftones have all kinds of weird fuck-ups in their lyrics. I'd blame the oral tradition, but it's probably just alcohol. My favourite one is changing "come all ye dryland sailors" to "come all ye drunken sailors."
no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 04:27 pm (UTC)In the same way, he's a genocidal lunatic. I'd have hated to be Fromm's union rep.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-21 07:46 pm (UTC)I know I have to give the rotter another chance, I just won't be doing it at Cinematheque prices...
no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 01:50 pm (UTC)