Get ready for the future
Nov. 6th, 2007 03:43 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Captain Mushroom: We tried out a chair in London. You sat down on it, and it would conform to the shape of your body and then squeeze, slowly and gently. The chair would actually give you a hug.
Me: It'll be so awesome when we can replace human emotions with robots.
Me: It'll be so awesome when we can replace human emotions with robots.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:50 pm (UTC)After some discussion, someone (I forget who) whittled the hypothetical post down to a single word: GAYBORTION.
When it came time to name the comic, I took a poll of all the various names I liked. "Gaybortion!" was actually tied with "That's Not Funny, My Friend Died That Way," but since my friend had just died, I went with "Gaybortion!"
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:19 pm (UTC)Dr. Grandin designs humane slaughterhouses and found that cattle will calm down if their sides are compressed. This sounds like kind of a nasty trick (to calm the cattle before they are killed), but it means they don't get shocked by cattle prods as often and are less prone to abject terror upon entering the abbatoire.
Anyway, I think it would be kind of awesome to have robotic hugging machines. It's not that different from using a vibrator, when you think about it. Vibrators certainly deliver the goods more cleanly and efficiently than their human counterparts. Machine sex and machine hugs for the win, I say.
Oh sex machine, let me be your fleshy little machine slave <3
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 09:28 pm (UTC)I suppose they have their uses, but for some reason I'd still be freaked out. Possibly because you know that a human's arms will eventually get sore, but not so much with a chair.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:43 pm (UTC)Electronic things run out of batteries and sometimes the motors burn out. I have mourned the tragic loss of two Vibes thus far. I guess I got too needy :(
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 12:43 am (UTC)Oh dear God. I am so glad that I never lived in rez.
Electronic things run out of batteries and sometimes the motors burn out. I have mourned the tragic loss of two Vibes thus far. I guess I got too needy :(
Aww, I'm sorry about your vibes! Still, take it as a point of pride. You're insatiable!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 05:08 am (UTC)Doesn't sound all that humane to me.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 01:40 am (UTC)You can't deny the utility of something that gives you multiple orgasms on demand and is never busy or too tired or sick. Sometimes it is nice to have sex with people, but sexual partners aren't guaranteed to love you just because they are not machines. People might fuck you because they are needy or lonely or because they don't get off on machine sex and are desperately driven to Sex version 1.0 (fleshy model).
I'd rather have my biological need for orgasms (and maybe also huggles?) fed mechanically so that I don't get attached to the wrong people out of haste and desperation.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 01:55 am (UTC)And if I were to be really serious, I'd say that the fact, say, that we typically don't enjoy masturbation as much as we do partner sex is all in our minds. I have had... wait, this is public post, isn't it?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:07 am (UTC)Is that a problem? ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:32 am (UTC)Anyway, stop distracting me - you have no idea how much planning I still have to do for tomorrow.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:11 am (UTC)So my question is this: is there something inherently bad about getting pleasure from a machine? What is it that makes us suspicious of a hug-machine? I have a gut feeling that there's something creepy about a hug machine, but I can't rationalize it. I can see that I might lose something valuable if I never sought people-hugs once I had machine-hugs, but is there any evidence to suggest this would be the case? Do people want to have less sex if they have orgasm-producing machines?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:24 am (UTC)I don't really believe in concepts such as "inherent evil" - Foucault would laugh at those, and I can't stand being laughed at.
People are typically reluctant to extend their psyche (myself very much included), and since most people in our culture grew up with the notion of sex not being complete without love, it might very well be that we will feel that such sex is incomplete. If we grew up with notions that sex is good for its own sake, than this would hardly be the case.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:05 pm (UTC)Perhaps it could vibrate and make a purring noise.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:47 pm (UTC)But this one you could sit on. That might be a bad idea, though: It might train people to sit on their cats.
Me: It'll be so awesome when we can replace human emotions with robots.
Just think: You could program your phone to whine "You never call."
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 01:48 am (UTC)Though when I'm not sick, is it my turn or yours to call?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:03 am (UTC)I forget too. Flip a coin?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:06 am (UTC)I call tails.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:12 am (UTC)Or had you already seen it?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:19 am (UTC)Did you actually flip a coin? If so, I call. Which probably couldn't be until the weekend.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:26 am (UTC)Saturday night I'm seeing Dave Brubeck(!)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-08 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:33 am (UTC)Or have I already mentioned that?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:35 am (UTC)I never quite understood that there was a conflict among non-automated auto-sex, machine assisted sex, and sex with someone else. Sort of the same thing as mashed potatoes vs. ice cream. I probably ought to try ice cream on the mashed potatoes some time, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 12:40 pm (UTC)Then again, I don't care much for mashed potatoes on their own.