sabotabby: (anarcat)
It's important to remember that when Indigenous activists (or my F6 ass doing my best to amplify their voices) say that things are bad, they're really bad, they've always been bad, no, worse than that—they are not exaggerating.

Case in point: The RCMP—yes, those quaint friendly Mounties that the Americans find adorable for whatever reason—just said the quiet part out loud. The Guardian broke the story and now it's spreading.

From the article:

Notes from a strategy session for a militarized raid on ancestral lands of the Wet’suwet’en nation show that commanders of Canada’s national police force, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), argued that “lethal overwatch is req’d” – a term for deploying snipers.

The RCMP commanders also instructed officers to “use as much violence toward the gate as you want” ahead of the operation to remove a roadblock which had been erected by Wet’suwet’en people to control access to their territories and stop construction of the proposed 670km (416-mile) Coastal GasLink pipeline (CGL).

In a separate document, an RCMP officer states that arrests would be necessary for “sterilizing the site”.
 

Another important thing to remember is that most of what Canada calls British Columbia is unceded territory, meaning the Indigenous people there never gave up possession of the land to European settlers. The government decided to build a pipeline through their land anyway. The land defenders were not using violence but even if they were, it would have been completely morally justifiable in the same way that if someone tries to break into your house in the middle of the night, you basically have the right to defend yourself and your property. Except in this case they're not just defending their community but the entire world, where we descendants of European settlers also—surprise!—have to live. But the RCMP acknowledged that while they did have firearms for hunting, there was zero indication that they intended to use them against the people violently invading their territory in violation of UN conventions.

And the RCMP planned to shoot them anyway. Including Elders and kids. Or at least shoot the adults and kidnap the kids.

This is under the shiny Liberal government of Prince Justin of the Nice Hair, by the way, who promised a nation-to-nation relationship (unless he really wanted to build a pipeline, like, really badly).

The fact that I'm not in any way surprised about this in no way lessens my utter disgust and contempt for the rotting and fetid colonialist project called Canada.

Genocide

Jun. 10th, 2019 06:18 pm
sabotabby: two lisa frank style kittens with a zizek quote (trash can of ideology)
 The final report of the Inquiry into Murdered and Missing Indigenous Women and Girls came out last week. It's 1200 pages and you can read it here (note: I have not). Among its conclusions and recommendations, it refers to the ongoing disinterest-to-outright-complicity of Canadians and the Canadian state in the deaths and disappearances of at least 1200 women and girls since 1980 constitutes an ongoing genocide.

This, to me, is a no-brainer. The relationship between the settler state and Indigenous peoples in general can really only be described as genocidal, to the point where Canada pushed quite heavily to redefine genocide at the UN in 1948 so that it couldn't be held accountable for trying to wipe out the vibrant cultures of Turtle Island.

For some reason, though, both Trudeau and the ambulatory bag of raw sewage threatening to ooze into Parliament after the next election have a really difficult time saying the G-word. So much for nation-to-nation and Haida tattoos in the former case; in the latter it's not exactly surprising that Yellow Vest ally Andrew Scheer is a goddamned racist. I'm nowhere near as active and involved in decolonization and Indigenous solidarity as I should be—as we all should be—but. Just. Gross. 

History will judge us for this. History is already judging us for this. There was a very low bar and we as a country couldn't even stumble over it.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
 ACAB and all that, but Brad Blair, deputy OPP commissioner, did do a very ethical thing in blowing the whistle on Drug Fraud's appointment of his completely unqualified buddy to the top cop job in the province.

So Ford fired him.

I'd appreciate that these dudes don't even bother hiding the appearance of corruption. They just sneer, "whatcha gonna do about it?" Except that there is very little any of us can do about it, short of measures most citizens are not willing to take.

Meanwhile, the rats continue to leave the sinking ship. I continue to boggle that Trudeau, who must have had the slickest road to power of any leader who was not born into a literal hereditary monarchy, managed to fuck up so spectacularly in such a short time. It's truly incredible.

And I read stories like this one, about a BC teacher who was fired from a publicly funded Christian school for moving in with her boyfriend, and think that it's the future of my profession. If I even still have a job after the budget comes down. I don't think the fear has even properly hit me yet.

They can do anything to us. Anything at all.

Teflon

Feb. 28th, 2019 07:02 am
sabotabby: swift wind from she-ra (swift wind)
 All of this SNC-Lavalin stuff has got me thinking. Caveat: I am, if it's in any way unclear, not a supporter of either the federal or provincial Liberals. The NDP are a bit too right-wing for me. I strongly believe that Trudeau needs to have his Haida tattoo sandpapered off, slowly.

This said; the scandal will probably take down Trudeau's government and install Andrew Scheer, who looks like he hasn't finished baking yet and pals around with literal Nazis. At the same time, we're watching scandal after scandal hit the provincial Tories, who have only been in power a few months, and solid proof that Trump committed criminal acts, including treason.

I am reminded of the 2010 mayoral election, where soft-left Adam Giambrone was forced to withdraw after possibly cheating on his partner, while Rob Ford, who beat his wife, drove drunk, smoked crack and possibly had someone killed to cover it up, only grew more popular as his term went on. No fan of Giambrone either, but why the double-standard?

Why do Liberal (and Democrat) governments fall to scandal while Conservatives (and Republicans) are untouchable, even when they commit far worse acts? What would happen if the centre-left behaved the same way and just...ignored scandals? Would they be punished electorally?
sabotabby: swift wind from she-ra (swift wind)
Like most of the country (or at least the part of the country that's been snowed in and thus reading the news as it updates), I'm pretty fascinated by the Puglaas-Trudeau-SNC Lavalin story. It's...complicated. Puglaas, a.k.a. Jody Wilson-Raybould, the former federal Justice Minister who Trudeau booted down to Veterans' Affairs a few weeks ago, resigned from cabinet today after a rather strong implication that she was being pressured by the PMO to abandon a prosecution against SNC-Lavalin. SNC Lavalin gets a lot of government contracts, employs 8,500 Canadians, and the RCMP is charging them with corruption and fraud after they (cough*allegedly*cough) tried to bribe officials in Libya, including Gadhafi. If convicted, the company can't bid on federal contracts for ten years, and current projects might be jeopardized, so it makes sense that Trudeau might want to quietly make those charges against his buddies go away.

Oh, except that's horribly corrupt, WTF. And as the attorney-general, Wilson-Raybould seems to not have felt comfortable doing this and said so, and thus was demoted to a less prestigious portfolio.

Then she resigned with this masterfully loaded letter, signing it with her indigenous name, Puglaas. There's quite a bit of nuance there and no one is really sure what she's up to, but it does not seem as though the bombshells are going to stop dropping any time soon.

It should be said that she is not some noble whistleblower and a number of indigenous activists have spoken out about various shitty things she did in Justice. And this could go very badly, since as bad as Prince Justin is, Scheer is infinitely worse and Singh just doesn't seem to want to be PM enough to actually fight for it.

Anyway. Popcorn. Also soliciting opinions and theories.

*

Closer to home, Drug Fraud managed to do another sneaky in education. The EQAO is our massively fucked up series of standardized tests, given in grades 3,6, 9, and 10. These tests are a massive waste of teachers' and students' time, don't measure what they are supposed to measure, are riddled with errors, and are a needless expense when school boards are strapped for cash. 

The EQAO is a weird balance, because like all standardized tests, it has no pedagogical value, but it has immense political value. See, the test scores must not be too low, or Ontario students are underachieving. But it cannot be too high, or the test is too easy. Students must score approximately 75% to pass (contrary to what Ford believes), but the actual score to pass changes every year and no one gets told what it is until after the test. But to prove that our school system is improving, average test scores must rise over time. If you understand math better than a politician, you'll see the numerical constraint at work.

Traditionally, visuals such as posters, anchor charts, word walls, formulas, and so on, have to get taken down when the kids write the test so that they can't "cheat." But this year, they've changed it, allowing a lot of material that would be helpful to a student writing the test. I wonder why?

Well, I am against having the test at all. And if kids do need to write the test, having helpful material on the walls is probably a good thing, since in the real world you can look stuff up, as this isn't the bloody 19th century. But it's obvious that students writing under the new conditions, with classroom visual aids, have an advantage over students writing under last year's conditions, with no classroom visual aids. So everything else being equal, students this year should score, on average, higher than students last year.

LOOK, THE TORIES FIXED EDUCATION.

Head. Desk.

*

Finally, as proof that we live in the strangest possible timeline, I offer you two more links to consider.

The first is that FOX News guy who says that he never washes his hands because "germs aren't real." Now, I know that "FOX News host says something stupid" isn't exactly headline news, but you have to marvel at someone being so backwards that the germ theory of disease, initially proposed in the 1500s and proven conclusively in the 1800s, made absolutely no impact on his worldview. I'm actually boggling that this guy is walking around, not having somehow given himself cholera from eating his own poo.

These are the kinds of people who have the ear of the giant toddler with his finger on the big red button.

He doesn't. Wash. His. Hands.

Da fuck.

But I'll leave you on a happier note, because the strangest timeline isn't always one completely lacking in hope. Comrade Cher has called for a general strike on Twitter. Lead us, O Goddess of Pop, to the new world built from the ashes of the old! I believe (in life after love).
sabotabby: (anarcat)
Just when I think I'm overly cynical about politics, I read a story like this one, wherein my supposedly "good" Liberal government, you know, the one led by a dreamboat male feminist with a Haida tattoo and the star of so many Meanwhile In Canada memes, stands by its existing arms deal with Saudi Arabia despite its monstrous repression of its own citizens, its genocidal war on Yemen that has left unknown numbers of people dead and 13 million facing famine, and fucking dismembering a journalist with a fucking bone saw. Chrystia Freeland, who can't help that her granddad was a Nazi collaborator but could theoretically choose to not be one herself, justifies this disgusting move because “it’s important for Canada’s word to last longer than any one particular government.”

Um, when has Saudi Arabia ever had a government that wasn't filled to the brim with the worst possible people on the planet? Or maybe she was talking about Canada's government, which I guess has never not been willing to collaborate with murderers, torturers, and war criminals.

I thought I was over news stories making me puke but nope. This sickens me such that I'm almost glad that climate change is going to kill us all off.


sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
 There's so much I want to write about and link to lately, but of course it's June and I'm a schoolteacher, so I've just been reblogging things on Facebook. And that's no way to live. Here are some highlights of the week.

The story gripping the city is of the Toronto Life story about a pair of self-involved, clueless rich kids who bought a Parkdale rooming house, sight unseen, and were shocked that people still lived there and also that you can't hire a contractor based on the fact that he's cycling by. This is all in the context of violent purging of the poor in the Parkdale neighbourhood, most notably an asshole landlord attempting to murder a tenant for striking against deplorable conditions. Quite a lot of pixels have been spilled over this issue, but the best response was my friend Todd's GoFundMe page (you can still donate), and the Metro interview with him that followed. Great stuff, and perfect timing—the Parkdale Rent Strike has the potential to be the most successful political action since BLM-TO forced Pride to ban uniformed, armed cops from getting paid to march in a parade that celebrated the very folks they like to beat up.

The Tories have a new Head Asshole, Andrew Scheer. No one has heard of this guy, and he conveniently had a lot of his more disgusting positions wiped from the intertubes. However, the Streisand Effect is still in play, so you can totally go and read what he's about. Spoiler: It ain't good. Fortunately, he has all the charisma of a mysteriously damp toilet paper roll, so I don't think he has much of a chance against Prince Justin or whoever the NDP nominates.

Do I have a clear preference for an NDP leader? I am shocked to say that no, I do not. I actually like multiple candidates. This is weird. I would be happy if Charlie Angus, Jagmeet Singh (with some reservations), or Niki Ashton won. I tend not to put a lot of hope in electoral politics but I do like having someone I can vote for and campaign for happily rather than someone who's the lesser of three evils.

Speaking of Niki, she's preggers. Yay Niki! She announced it on Twitter, because we live in the darkest possible timeline, and minor douchecanoe Brian Lilley got upset because she did not specify that she was pregnant with a human fetus. What else might she be pregnant with? Speculation abounded. Was it an alien? A tank-human hybrid? A dinosaur? No one knew until she clarified, kinda.

The coolest thing to happen around these parts is that the Ontario Liberals—who I don't even tend to like—announced that the minimum wage would rise to $15 by 2019, along with several other good labour reforms. This is great news, though in Toronto, where the cost of living is stupidly high compared to the rest of the province, it doesn't go far enough for my liking. Almost everyone is in favour, except for this whiny fuckhead, who is such an incompetent businessman that he can't afford to pay people to work for him. He was shocked and appalled to find himself the target of a boycott, and put up an even whinier sign that was immediately mocked for obvious reasons.

I try not to ever think about Barbara Kay, but a hero at Canadaland read that pro-genocide book that she recommended so that you don't have to.

Speaking of genocide against the First Nations, guess how much Trudeau's government spent fighting against indigenous rights in court? #sunnyways #colonialismbutfromtheheartoutwards

In international news, though I hate to go there:

Ivanka Trump makes her shoes in a Chinese sweatshop (no surprise there) and three activists have been disappeared for looking into it.

Laurie Penny continues to be my internet girlfriend. Here's a scathing editorial about freezed peach.

Finally, it is extremely important that we know about whether Melania is getting, and I quote, "federally-funded side peen." Yeah, you're welcome.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Mistgeburt)
I've seen a number of images and video on the theme of last night's election, but there's only one image—though it has failed to gain the traction that shirtless!Trudeau has managed—that can adequately sum up how I feel about the results.

Transmetropolitan_13_p21

That's from the cyberpunk masterpiece Transmetropolitan by Warren Ellis, and if you haven't read it, what are you doing reading my blog? This comic is so much better, and astonishingly prescient. In my favourite arc, the current President, known only as The Beast (even to his children) is challenged by a telegenic, liberal-seeming politician nicknamed The Smiler. At first, Spider Jerusalem, our cynical journalist hero who is in no way Hunter S. Thompson, grudgingly admires him—insofar as he can admire any politician—until he discovers that while The Beast, who is in no way Richard Nixon, is an authoritarian monster, the Smiler, who is in no way Tony Blair, is hiding something much worse.

I don't need to tell you what happens next. You've read a dystopian book or two.

I swear, if I see one more "congratulations Canada!" post, I am going to fucking hurl. It's bad from Americans, as you guys don't really understand our political system or major parties, but it's worse from Canadians, who don't understand our political system or major parties. While I'm as happy as anyone to not have to use this icon anymore—

Screen Shot 2015-10-20 at 4.20.05 PM
(You get to see it one more time though. Sorry.)

—there is no cause for celebration. And here's why.

Justin Trudeau is indistinguishable from Harper on most things that count, except scarier because no one seems to understand this.

I would ask all Canadians who "voted strategically"* or caught themselves saying "anyone but Harper" to ask themselves why they hate Harper.

Is it because his economic policies favour the rich at the expense of the poor? From a friend's post (since I'm too exhausted to dig up more authoritative sources, but trust me, this is the Liberal fiscal plan):


1) A tax increase on the rich 1%, in order to give the upper 50% a tax cut. People making over 100k, but less than 200k will be looking at a tax cut amounting to $600. Those who make 50k a year will get $80 dollars, those below $45k get nothing.
2) GST cuts for land developers who build "for profit" rental housing -- make a profit, get a tax cut plan. Mike Harris tried, and failed to promote affordable housing using "tax incentives", and the Liberal plan will also fail.
3) Cuts to EI payroll tax, further reducing available funds available for unemployed workers. In the 70s, 70% of the unemployed were serviced through EI (UIC), today only 30%. The Liberal plan continues this trajectory.
4) Expansion of the "baby-bonus" system instituted in 2006 by Harper in place of a daycare plan. Extremely wasteful use of government money.



Okay, math is hard. How about the environment? Trudeau's not quite so bad there, but he supports the Keystone XL pipeline and I'll bet you anything he flips on the other two.

Do you like jobs? Freedom of speech and privacy on the intertubes? Transparency when it comes to trade deals with other countries? Well, Harper negotiated that stuff away in secret with the TPP, but fortunately there's Wikileaks and come on people, if it were a good deal for Canada, they'd have told us what was in it. Instead, the Conservatives held out spilling details before the election, so everyone who doesn't keep up with trade deal acronyms was left in the dark as to how hard we'd get reamed.**

Trudeau doesn't know what's in it. But he's for it.

Most important to me personally, though, is the Harper government's attacks on our civil liberties. That would be Bill C-24, which takes the unprecedented step of allowing the government to strip the citizenship of any Canadian who is eligible for dual citizenship. This includes me, if you were wondering. If someone decides I'm a terrorist (more on that in a sec), I can be deported to Israel. Imagine. The Liberals supported the bill.

Even worse is Bill C-51, which is a mass surveillance, thought crime, and arbitrary arrest bill, loosely defining terrorism as "whatever we don't like," the sort of thing that they used to write dystopian literature about before dystopian literature became a manual for policy writing. The Liberals voted for that one, too. Except Trudeau; he didn't think the skullfucking of our most basic human rights was worth showing up to vote on.

Now, the one nice thing I can say about Liberals is that I appreciate their ideology. They have none. They crave power, and only power; their sole political aim is to get elected and stay there. This is kind of cool because it means that they're by and large not bigots. One voter-unit is the same as the next, and they don't care what your gender or sexual orientation or ethnicity is. So things, in the short-term, might suck slightly less for the Muslims who are getting assaulted on our streets by Harper brownshirts.

Oh, but shit, yo, Trudeau also voted for Bill S-7, the—I'm not fucking making this up—"Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act," which makes things that were already illegal more illegal if you do them while brown. So while I don't think the Liberals are racist for ideological reasons the way the Tories are, they'll be racist if it'll make them popular. And as the whole niqab debacle and the aforementioned brownshirts illustrate, Canadians are pretty fucking racist.

So tell me why I should be happy today. Other than that my inevitable "Prince Justin is a Twat" icon is going to be nicer to look at than my Harper "Fuck the People" icon. Seriously.

The other bad news is that the Liberals' gains come mostly at the expense, not of the Tories, but of the NDP, who while far from being proper socialists, at least voted against all of the shitty things I just mentioned. We lost a bunch of really great MPs to strategic voting. Just to give one example, Dan Harris in Scarborough Southwest, a hardworking progressive who is just a wonderful guy, lost to Bill Blair, former Chief Pig, who supports carding despite the fact that it's racist and doesn't work, and who presided over the vicious police state that Toronto became during the G20. Or awesome Olivia Chow losing to career sleazebag Adam Vaughan. Or punk-rock-as-fuck Andrew Cash losing to "who the fuck is she?" Julie Dzerowicz. (Seriously, what does "held senior leadership roles in the private and public sector" mean?) Or, in the campaign I worked on, Matthew Kellway, who lost to some guy who no one knows anything about except that the name "Trudeau" was on his sign. (Note to my countrymen—we vote for MPs, not the fucking president; learn what your MP stands for and don't just vote based on the party leader.)

Now, I don't even say this as an NDP ideologue, because I'm not one. I only joined the NDP very briefly, to try to keep Mulcair from winning the leadership after Layton's death, and left when they took the word "socialism" out of the party platform. I volunteered with Kellway's campaign out of outrage over Bill C-51 and support for the only political party that had convictions and a commitment to democracy. I'm glad I did, exhausting and depressing as it was. I'm hoping that this defeat leads to a reexamination of the NDP's Blairite direction, perhaps even an exodus of the rightward elements like we've seen in the UK. One hopes the correct lessons have been learned.

In any event, I was despairing last night, as Canada swapped a kitten-eating robot for a born-to-rule pretty boy with more or less the same political leanings but better hair, and backslapped and rejoiced and called it "change." I felt a little less despairing when I woke up and remembered:

1) This is basically the political configuration of my youth, with a Liberal majority, a Tory opposition, and the NDP snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. (The Orange Crush in the last election was an aberration based on Quebec's weirdness and Layton's charisma; the NDP should never have expected to build on Quebec as a base.)

2) Electoral politics has never been the main thing that I do; among other reasons, I'm far to the left of anyone electable.

3) As someone who writes a lot of dystopian fiction, I would be at a loss for inspiration if I ever actually liked the government in power.

4) Having canvassed once or twice a week, every week, for almost three months, my ass is looking really fine.

Sadly, though, Canadian media has no one like Spider Jerusalem to expose the truth, and those of us who value silly little things like freedom and democracy are left to muddle through as best we can. I hope we can rebuild from this, but it's easier to take rights away than it is to gain them, and there's more work to do with a populace that thinks it's free than one that knows it isn't. We must be at once—and I hope the NDP understands this, because historically it hasn't—both principled and ruthless.

Good riddance, Beast, and welcome Smiler, and the rest of you can hold your fucking congratulations until you see what he has in store.

* Note, remember next time that anyone who tells you to "vote strategically" is telling you to support the Liberals. The NDP were winning at the outset.

** I'd say they deserved it for not educating themselves, but I have to live with the results of their ignorance.


ETA: The Beaverton, as usual, has the best coverage: Nation groggily wakes up next to Justin Trudeau:


“Really, the C-51 guy? The guy who’s friends with Bill Blair?” said New Zealand, over Snapchat. “Tell me he at least doesn’t have a douchey native-inspired tattoo.”

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 23 45
678 910 1112
131415 1617 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 11:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags