Let's dunk on the publishing industry
Feb. 20th, 2023 11:12 amSo I find myself agreeing with the free-speech absolutists and the Tories about Puffin Books' rewrite of Roald Dahl's books, which is odd company to be in. Though, I want to point out that this is not an "Ironic! It's the left doing Bowlderization, not the right. The left are the real scolds, etc." This isn't a left thing, this is a capitalist thing, because Puffin is in the business of selling books, and it's harder (though not impossible) to sell racist, sexist, and fatphobic books in the Year Of Our Lord 2023. At least to children. As it should be.
Unpopular opinion: Roald Dahl's books are fundamentally cruel. I've seen the rewrites and they don't actually change that—they just soften some of the language and representation in them. But the appeal of them, let's be honest here, is their cruelty.
It's like if you edited Lovecraft and took the racism out. Sure, there are some cool things in Lovecraft that we all love, but the fear of the Other is baked in. Taking that out is misrepresenting the books. It's better to riff off of his stuff or to write something new than go back and try to rehabilitate them.
Dahl's writing is vicious and sadistic, and that's why I loved those books as a kid. They're not healthy and wholesome. They're an outlet for the worst urges that children have.
I think if you want your kid to grow up to be a loving, wholesome, kind person, you give them something else to read, not Bowlderized Dahl. Or you sit down with them and explain what's wrong with them. But you don't rewrite them to be nice.
ETA: Never mind, I found the best solution.
Unpopular opinion: Roald Dahl's books are fundamentally cruel. I've seen the rewrites and they don't actually change that—they just soften some of the language and representation in them. But the appeal of them, let's be honest here, is their cruelty.
It's like if you edited Lovecraft and took the racism out. Sure, there are some cool things in Lovecraft that we all love, but the fear of the Other is baked in. Taking that out is misrepresenting the books. It's better to riff off of his stuff or to write something new than go back and try to rehabilitate them.
Dahl's writing is vicious and sadistic, and that's why I loved those books as a kid. They're not healthy and wholesome. They're an outlet for the worst urges that children have.
I think if you want your kid to grow up to be a loving, wholesome, kind person, you give them something else to read, not Bowlderized Dahl. Or you sit down with them and explain what's wrong with them. But you don't rewrite them to be nice.
ETA: Never mind, I found the best solution.