Yo, is this racist?
Aug. 1st, 2012 02:36 pmWhen I was in high school, we had to read this anvillicious fantasy about a Chinese dude who gets stranded on some Island of the Ladies, where they bind his feet and completely oppress him. I'm guessing that it was well-intentioned, and written by a well-intentioned dude who probably considered himself a male feminist, but it angered my 17-year-old wannabe PoMo self so much that I argued about Foucault until I got myself kicked out of class.
I get the same vibes, times approximately a million because I don't think the author is all that well-intentioned, when I looked at Save the Pearls. It's one of those post-apocalyptic YA fantasies that is all the rage with Kids These Days. The central conceit is astoundingly original: What if, instead of racism against black people, there was racism against pretty white teenage girls?
Yes. Really.
There's also a cute little video where a white teenager dons blackface because we're making an Important Social Statement here.
It's the kind of concept that a reasonably bright high school kid would come up with ("What if straight people were discriminated against just like gay people are? How would you feel?") and that would be fine, except this is presumably the work of an adult, and loaded with far more problematic imagery—dehumanizing language (coals vs. pearls, mating), the threat of a young white woman forced to have sex with a black man, and the aforementioned blackface. You can't just flip racism upside-down and have it be a serious critique. Obviously, because it's not a problem of simple prejudice where any group can be a stand-in for any other group. I'm preaching to the converted here.
I gather that I'm not the first (or second, or tenth) person to find the whole thing objectionable, because there's a hilarious post by "Eden" (the name of the book's main character) on the site blog:
If you critique this book, you are just like HUAC! I guess that's better than pulling a Godwin, but not by much.
The author seems to be unaware that no one is trying to censor her here. Pointing out that the imagery in a novel is problematic as all get out is not the same as suppressing an author's ability to write said problematic imagery. It's probably even going to help her, given that this is a little vanity press and any publicity is good publicity.
Also, judging a book by its cover is awesome. I moonlight as a book designer. If we didn't want people to judge our covers and buy or not buy the book accordingly, all books would have plain covers with just the title and author.*
The Lurkers Support Me In E-mail! Also, pointing out racism is just like racism.
Basically, this imagery isn't neutral. You can't read it outside of its cultural context, outside of this or this or this. It's particularly difficult for a white author to try something like this, and a good example of why we can't have nice things.
Here's a bit of unsolicited advice: If people are already calling you out, author, it is best to listen to them rather than to post defensive things on your blog. They may in fact have a very good point.
ETA: Ah, I see it's already made sf-drama. Carry on, then.
(Hat tip:
audrawilliams)
* See Ursula K. LeGuin's The Dispossessed for a nice example of this.
I get the same vibes, times approximately a million because I don't think the author is all that well-intentioned, when I looked at Save the Pearls. It's one of those post-apocalyptic YA fantasies that is all the rage with Kids These Days. The central conceit is astoundingly original: What if, instead of racism against black people, there was racism against pretty white teenage girls?
Yes. Really.
There's also a cute little video where a white teenager dons blackface because we're making an Important Social Statement here.
It's the kind of concept that a reasonably bright high school kid would come up with ("What if straight people were discriminated against just like gay people are? How would you feel?") and that would be fine, except this is presumably the work of an adult, and loaded with far more problematic imagery—dehumanizing language (coals vs. pearls, mating), the threat of a young white woman forced to have sex with a black man, and the aforementioned blackface. You can't just flip racism upside-down and have it be a serious critique. Obviously, because it's not a problem of simple prejudice where any group can be a stand-in for any other group. I'm preaching to the converted here.
I gather that I'm not the first (or second, or tenth) person to find the whole thing objectionable, because there's a hilarious post by "Eden" (the name of the book's main character) on the site blog:
First, consider that the basis of all prejudice is judging a book by its cover. To condemn any book on the basis of its cover is hardly different than condemning a total stranger because of the color of his/her skin. How can you critique or damn a book if you haven’t read it? This kind of blind attack is exactly what creates racism or condemned many progressives as communists in the Fifties.
If you critique this book, you are just like HUAC! I guess that's better than pulling a Godwin, but not by much.
The author seems to be unaware that no one is trying to censor her here. Pointing out that the imagery in a novel is problematic as all get out is not the same as suppressing an author's ability to write said problematic imagery. It's probably even going to help her, given that this is a little vanity press and any publicity is good publicity.
Also, judging a book by its cover is awesome. I moonlight as a book designer. If we didn't want people to judge our covers and buy or not buy the book accordingly, all books would have plain covers with just the title and author.*
And there is reason to support my belief when you consider that the novel has won five literary awards, including the Eric Hoffer Best Young Adult Novel 2012 (Eric Hoffer was a great humanitarian), or that Marianne Williamson called it on her Facebook page, “A fascinating story…for lovers of all ages!” or that dozens of reviewers from the San Francisco Book Review to Fresh Fiction to many book bloggers have embraced it with glowing reviews.
And if you ask if all these reviewers are white then consider that you have a racist point of view.
The Lurkers Support Me In E-mail! Also, pointing out racism is just like racism.
Basically, this imagery isn't neutral. You can't read it outside of its cultural context, outside of this or this or this. It's particularly difficult for a white author to try something like this, and a good example of why we can't have nice things.
Here's a bit of unsolicited advice: If people are already calling you out, author, it is best to listen to them rather than to post defensive things on your blog. They may in fact have a very good point.
ETA: Ah, I see it's already made sf-drama. Carry on, then.
(Hat tip:
* See Ursula K. LeGuin's The Dispossessed for a nice example of this.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 06:57 pm (UTC)http://racebending.tumblr.com/post/28133063475/victoria-foyt-describes-the-praise-and-possible
We're way beyond blindness here into some weird territory of racial psychopathy.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 06:59 pm (UTC)....and my cat is throwing up. Gotta go. Frankly it's a relief.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:34 pm (UTC)I read the first chapter. Too awful to spork.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 06:58 pm (UTC)Really, WTF?
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:16 pm (UTC)But it was trying to be pretty complete in describing all the gradations of racism including internalized racism and polite racism instead of just going "ok, let's pretend white people are the oppressed ones."
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:19 pm (UTC)I was amazed at how a subject line I'd expect on a blog post poking fun at the entitled racist arrogance of the author is used sincerely to express the author's entitled racist arrogance.
Yet this holds nothing to the jaw-dropping double down insistence that her premise could totally happen:
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:23 pm (UTC)They can also walk on ceilings. Trufax.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 07:56 pm (UTC)Told that to me cousin in a debate over Obama. She is no longer talking to me.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 10:40 pm (UTC)Smegma
Maggot
Grub
Dough
Marshmallow
Cheese
Tighty-whiteys
Or, you know, "ghosts," which is an actual term that people use.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 02:19 pm (UTC)It's sad that the cover of The Dispossessed isn't plain green with a Circle of Life stamped on it. Instead, it always looks silly on the cover.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 06:04 pm (UTC)I think as you lot are nearer the U.S. these things must come up a lot more. I wish we were as far politically from the U.S. as we are geographically, here. Or rather further!
I haven't reread the Dispossessed since I was 12 or 13. It was the first book that made me go WOW and think there must be something magic in literature. I was so excited. I might be disappointed if I reread it nw.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 06:48 pm (UTC)Sponsored Review Program
If you have published a book and want to have a professional review of your book, you can participate in our Sponsored Review program to receive a guaranteed review. We will email your review to you for approval prior to publishing it. A Sponsored Review is not a guaranteed glowing review of your book. We’re not in the business of providing vanity reviews. If you should find our review unfavorable or not to your liking, you can choose to trade the review for an ad (see below).
no subject
Date: 2012-08-02 07:38 pm (UTC)