sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
[personal profile] sabotabby
The CBC is frantically posting a ton of polls that no one cares about or reads (okay, this one is admittedly funny, but you don't need to waste your time by participating. I'll be doing my own fair and balanced poll right here!

Have at it!

[Poll #623010]

Date: 2005-11-30 02:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groovitude.livejournal.com
OMG, I call for a new poll. This one has too many choices.

Date: 2005-11-30 03:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groovitude.livejournal.com
Dude, give us credit for our two party system, which is a direct result of declaring our independence from Britain about one million years before Canada.

Date: 2005-11-30 03:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groovitude.livejournal.com
Well, on the other hand, America has given the world the choice to drink iced tea made from the melted ice of the polar caps. Mmmmm...environmentalicious.

Date: 2005-11-30 04:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groovitude.livejournal.com
Oh, yeah? America gives the wretched refuse of your teeming shore the freedom to be deported nicely or kicked on the can until it hits the fan.

Now kids...

Date: 2005-11-30 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morgoid.livejournal.com
Can't our countries work together to persecute our immigrants? Look at the sucess of the Maher Arar case!

Re: Now kids...

Date: 2005-11-30 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groovitude.livejournal.com
Admittedly, US and Canada are always trying to top each other on that score. I can't imagine why one of them would want the other to look like it's winning the fight against "illegal" immigrants. There is a blood rivalry between them--a duel to death, if you will, a race towards that fabled land called "zero population growth," which, like Gatsby's dream, keeps eluding them, boats against the current, and so on....

Re: Now kids...

Date: 2005-11-30 08:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frandroid.livejournal.com
A race against the race!!

Date: 2005-12-01 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agent-moody.livejournal.com
Canada's own sealburgers, tenderised to perfection!

Date: 2005-11-30 03:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frippy.livejournal.com
But we don't have to have that ugly-ass queen lizardbreath on our moneys and highways and washroom signs...

Date: 2005-11-30 04:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frippy.livejournal.com
Yeah, those colonial American anthems like "Fuck King George the Third with a Hardened Biscuit*" don't have the same punch 230 years later.

*An act later renamed "Yankee Doodle"

Date: 2005-11-30 04:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groovitude.livejournal.com
YOU'RE CRACKING ME UP, YOU FIENDISH HARPY!!!

Date: 2005-11-30 04:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] groovitude.livejournal.com
OMG, queen lizardbreath!!!!!!

LMAO

Date: 2005-12-01 01:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] see-my-glock.livejournal.com
initially we had many more parties

Date: 2005-11-30 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bike4fish.livejournal.com
You forgot a question:

Will the next PM last longer than John Turner did?

Date: 2005-11-30 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bike4fish.livejournal.com
I think John Turner lasted a month. He was in and out so fast it made people's eyes hurt.

Edit: Ok, I'm type impared today

Date: 2005-11-30 05:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patgund.livejournal.com
As long as they don't last as long as Mackenzie King.

Date: 2005-12-01 01:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rohmie.livejournal.com
Wait: They once made Spuds prime minister?

Fine icon, by the way.

Date: 2005-11-30 02:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jvmatucha.livejournal.com
I don't know the various subtlties of Canadian politics, so I will just go on record as saying that [livejournal.com profile] sabotabby should be Prime Minister!

I don't suppose you can give a Yank a high paying Canadian government job, could you? :D

Date: 2005-12-02 12:04 am (UTC)
medie: queen elsa's grand entrance (sga - maple sarcasm - rodney snark)
From: [personal profile] medie
Sure! We'll make you Yank in charge of hanging up on George. Feel free to hurl insults and obscenities before doing so of course. We give grand pay raises for that one :-p

Date: 2005-11-30 03:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] threeliesforone.livejournal.com
it's probably really bad that not only am i going to vote NDP despite being opposed to electoral politics, i also agreed to put up an NDP sign in our kitchen window. i live in the riding peter kent is running in, though, so i maintain that i'm allowed. or something.

Date: 2005-11-30 04:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frippy.livejournal.com
I say opt for total anarchy, become a vast land of interconnected but unique and independent communities, and make conservative American commentators' heads explode.

Unrealistic? Oh come on! Alberta knows, deep down, it wants to be as free as Quebec does.

Date: 2005-11-30 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zingerella.livejournal.com
Yeah, but OMG the organizational headaches that interconnectedness would bring! If Canadians opted for total anarchy, within two weeks we'd have established joint sub-sub-subcommittees on everything! I mean everything: transit, upkeep of the QEW, importation of apples to Ontario and maple syrup to B.C.

And Alberta only wants to be free so that it can not associate with anything French.

Seriously? The notion of a sovereign Alberta makes me very scared.

Date: 2005-11-30 07:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morgoid.livejournal.com
I've told people that if Alberta ever gets it's all independent, I'm staging a mass exodus to BC, starting at the Legislature grounds.

I'll even get my friend Diego to dress up as Moses I'm so hardcore!

...sigh...

I work for the prov. government right now... and I think I'm losing my will to live.

Date: 2005-12-02 12:07 am (UTC)
medie: queen elsa's grand entrance (sga - maple sarcasm - rodney snark)
From: [personal profile] medie
If Alberta ever gets independant we'll all fall over laughing watching Ralph Klein flop around helplessly like a Stephen Harper trying not to screw up. It'll be a gas right up until Kutcher pops out and tells Ralphie he's been punked.

Date: 2005-11-30 05:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patgund.livejournal.com
Simple, appoint a Royal Commission to look into the matter of Anarchy. They'll report back in a decade or so.

Date: 2005-11-30 04:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roter-terror.livejournal.com
I vote for Rush.

Date: 2005-11-30 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zingerella.livejournal.com
Do you usually vote for Rush?

Date: 2005-11-30 07:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morgoid.livejournal.com
Who DOESN'T vote for Rush?

Date: 2005-11-30 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dobrovolets.livejournal.com
As always, I stand for the building of a revolutionary party of the working class. Since that's not going to happen between now and mid-January, the question arises of whether to employ a critical support tactic on another party. The only ones for which that can even be considered, on the grounds of working-class political independence, are the NDP and the CPC-ML. In the latter case, it's just farcical, pointless. In the former case, I would need to know a lot more about the current political situation in Canada. What are the strike rates? Does the NDP have any provincial governments right now? What are they claiming their attitude to another Liberal minority government would be? And so forth.

Date: 2005-11-30 08:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frandroid.livejournal.com
The current NDP leader has done more than any previous leader to put distance between his party and the labour movement.

However that can be linked to the new electoral finance law, which prevents unions and corporations alike from making large contributions to political parties. (Although even there, it's a bit skewed towards business, but I think the unions are glad to have this financial obligation lifted from their bottom-line...)

As for minority governments, I think the NDP would work with any party that would agree to key platform planks, like protecting healthcare. It would be really hard for them to ally with the Conservatives, but should it be a rainbow coalition (Bloc/NDP/Cons), they could find some common grounds, for example:
- electoral reform
- decentralization of the government (although the NDP is rather opposed to this, but it can be tweaked)
- euh, I'll have to think more about this

An NDP/Liberal coalition is a lot more likely, except that it is very probable that the NDP would have more seats and thus more clout in such a coalition.

Date: 2005-12-02 12:10 am (UTC)
medie: queen elsa's grand entrance (sga - maple sarcasm - rodney snark)
From: [personal profile] medie
Alas I am stuck voting for the current incompetent morons as opposed to the terrifying, rightwing cardboard morons with the pretty second in command or the endearingly inept but very earnest morons with the "oh please, oh please vote for us we're not pitiful" leader.

Yeah, the current bunch're getting up there and can't really get it going anymore, the little blue pills've failed, and they make funny noises but...hey, when they finally do bump off, we'll inherit a fortune and shack up with the hot young thang next door. Err...*looks over* or, y'know, maybe the polar ice caps'll melt and we all die horrible deaths.

Sounds good to me.

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

March 2026

S M T W T F S
123 45 67
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Page generated Mar. 12th, 2026 07:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags