sabotabby: (lolmarx)
With the caveat that it has been a very long time since I read Das Kapital, I'd like to ramble on a bit about economic reproduction and reproductive labour. Marx's theories of labour and exploitation boil down quite simply: The work of the baker to produce bread all day pays him enough money to buy a loaf of bread; the value of the remainder goes to his boss as profit. But there are hidden costs; someone must launder the baker's apron to allow him to keep baking bread, and those costs are generally not borne by the boss. Marx talked about the physical maintenance of the worker's body and family, as well as the social reproduction of the workforce. Essentially you can't work someone 24 hours a day, or they die, and they don't have time to reproduce the next generation of workers.

the person who has to bake a loaf to earn the money to buy a slice of bread is not freeMarxist feminists take it a step further to talk about reproductive labour—the domestic work of maintaining the workforce that is not factored into economic analysis because it's unpaid and gendered. It includes cooking, cleaning, childrearing, washing, and so on—activities that are necessary for the worker to produce profit for capitalists. Without this work, the baker can't go to work and bake every day, and his boss eventually won't be able to find new bakers to replace him. The capitalist ideal, for people who like capitalism, is based around the idea that one worker in the family unit receives a family wage, subsidizing the reproductive labour of a partner. This is an aberration, as few jobs supply a family wage and generally speaking, reproductive labour is performed around paid labour, during the (presumed female) worker's "free" time.

(Teaching in a public system is also an interesting case; as a public service, it generates no profit, but it's paid work and necessary for economic reproduction. The labour theory of value does not apply in the same way; economic reproduction and reproductive labour does.)

Regardless, reproduction is a cost that is largely subsidized by a worker. My employer gets 8-10 hours a day of labour from me. I receive a fraction of those profits as a wage, and the rest go to the employer. But there are a number of activities that need to be done in order to make those hours happen. If I commute an hour to get to my workplace, that commuting time is not paid. If I have to wear professional clothing to do my job, the cost of that clothing and its repair or replacement as it wears out, is not borne by my employer, even though I can't go to work in torn jeans and a dirty hoodie and it's therefore a requirement of completing the job. My employer probably doesn't pay for childcare or meals. All of those costs—financial and time wise—are required for making my 8-10 hours of labour happen, but however they may vary, this is an expense that affects me, not my boss's profits.

Enter the New Normal, as they call it. When COVID started, some of us fantasized about 4-hour days, working from home, flexibility with childcare, a universal basic income, even a narrowing of wealth inequality and a flowering of empathy brought about by our shared suffering.

Well, that didn't happen.

What's happened instead is that these externalities have increased in time and cost. If I want to buy groceries, I can't just easily pop to the store; I need to wait in line for an hour and pay more for what I buy. I have to do more laundry to avoid infection, and my clothing will wear out faster and need to be replaced sooner. I have to clean more to avoid surface contamination. All of this is necessary for the employer to profit, but I don't get an hour off to buy groceries, or to do a deep clean.

In my case, the employer has decided to use this opportunity to lengthen my work day and workload by 33%. I'm guessing this isn't uncommon. There's a renewed worry that workers might be taking advantage of the pandemic, that a child or pet is distracting them from staring at a computer screen, that CERB is preventing them from pounding pavement to get a job that doesn't actually exist, that grocery store workers getting danger pay are somehow getting soft. Even though everything is harder, more expensive, and takes longer, we're still being stretched thinner, every last drop of moisture in our bodies sucked dry. At a time when we should have expected compassion, the few individuals who've done quite well in this situation and are well-insulated from exposure themselves have taken the opportunity that our exhaustion and trauma has revealed to ensure that we don't relax, even for a second. Because we'll be in debt forever, don't you know? Prepare for pain, and more pain.

In this respect, the new normal looks exactly like the old normal. Except that the flip side of economic reproduction—rest and leisure, love, sex, friendship, community—is forbidden. You will work as hard, harder, harder than that, and you will risk your life, and at the end of the day you don't get a hug. You don't get to go to the pub or get a haircut. You don't get dancing or music. Just sickness, disability, premature death. And be grateful you have a job at all.

It enrages me that we as workers have taken this so placidly, docile cows awaiting the knife, but what can I say, I'm exhausted and traumatized too, and I'm not fighting nearly as hard as I should be either. Welcome to the new normal, which is the same as the old normal except you don't get to grab a beer with your friends after you're done being exploited for the day.
sabotabby: (lolmarx)
So much walking up hills. So worth it.

First up: Hampstead Heath. For someone who walked up multiple mountains last year, I am awful at hills. But I am going to be so fit when I get back home, omg.

Then Bucket List Item #1: Highgate Cemetery.

If I had to come up with the names of two men who are among the reasons I turned out this way, you would find both of those people buried here.

9F958A5B-2825-4A31-BAEA-E7618984B16A

Note: No other gravestone has a lot number. Someone just put it there.

Douglas Adams sparked my love of sci-fi and British humour and as a wee tiny child of 8, I had most of Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy memorized, even though at 8 there was no way I could have gotten all the references. But it was my favourite book for years and years.

B4BA1EC7-6D5A-4DE9-8CC6-4FC991CC305D

I left a pen on his grave. It’s my only pen, so I guess I’ll have to get another one on the way home.

And of course, the big man himself, and I imagine I don’t need to explain why visiting his grave was the top thing I wanted to see in London:

A9EA5088-83D5-4504-BA34-6362D0192090

(I have many other photos; I am sparing you b/c I am nice.)

48EB1681-1D63-4B34-9202-2EA89C70B892

Bonus Malcolm McLaren as he’s there too:

737E13CF-7DA7-4833-9846-0684CB41FC77

Then we went on a Hidden London tour of the abandoned station at Highgate. It was meant to be a Big Deal but war and economics interfered, and it was decommissioned. Now nature is reclaiming it and the city has decided to just leave it alone and let it be a sanctuary for endangered bats.

0615A4D4-7B83-4F33-8B42-F16859DED583

I have a lot of other pictures of it too, but for some reason Flickr isn’t allowing me to upload anything horizontal, so you’ll have to wait to see those after I edit them.

Then we went to Manuelita, a play about Manuela Saenz, a Latin American revolutionary and lover of Simón Bolívar, which was excellent and surprisingly entertaining.

Now I am off to bed.
sabotabby: (teacher lady)
Did you know that I work for an actual fanatical Marxist school board that teaches kids horrible things like class warfare, anti-racism, and not beating up hookers?

Oh, SUN News, you are precious.

TDSB day of significance : Prime time : SunNews Video Gallery

The answer, as always, is "scrap public education and give the money back to the parents."

Meanwhile, Crackgate continues, with the Honourable Wife-Beater still refusing to comment (I watched almost the entire City Hall proceedings yesterday, where he appeared hungover but not inebriated and did not answer any questions about crack). Jon Stewart's take is, of course, great.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (commiebot)
MY GOD YOU GUYS I AM SO TIRED. Totally worth it. But I feel like I'm going to sleep for a year and do nothing but watch TV and read cheesy fantasy novels for a bit.

Today's panels:

The Circuits of Labour and Capital. Translation: Migrant labour, and I chose this one both out of interest and because I knew three out of the five people involved. Alas, two didn't show (including the one who's in 2 Revolución). The other two were really good, though.

Marxist Aesthetics and Utopia. This was the perfect note to end on. Relevant to my interests in a big way, and we got into a debate about Tatlin's Monument to the Third International that ended up going way overtime and summarizing many of the themes in the conference as a whole. I Googled the presenter, Travis English, and I think he might also be the guy who does all of those cool minimalism posters that you see all over the intertubes. Not sure. Anyway, the discussion induced pangs in me because when I was thinking about grad school, I was thinking about working on Russian Constructivism stuff, which is at the intersection of art, design, and radical politics. Also, I love Monument to the Third International. It's brilliant on every level, encompassing both the power of the theory of dialectical materialism and the fragility of the revolutionary moment. And as someone pointed out in the discussion, as much as it was a failure in the sense that it was never built, given the history of the Russian revolution, it might have been more of a failure if it had been built. As an ethereal work that exists in the imagination instead of in reality, it's a more powerful symbol of revolutionary potential than if it existed as an actual physical object.


I shouldn't be so surprised to find out that people have Photoshopped the hell out of what it would have looked like if built.

SPEAKING OF SCULPTURE! Bad sculpture, this time. I failed utterly for the third day in a row to capture the glory that is the dick sculptures. However, I realized I could just Google it, and so here they are:

Photobucket
Fontana d'Italia by Enzo Cucchi.

Notice that the water is jetting out in the photo. In reality, it drizzles down the shaft and looks more like this. Ah, York. How much I do not miss you at all.

Anyway, all in all the conference was even better than my already inflated expectations, and I'm so glad I went. I think this is the longest I've been consistently in a good mood since Maggie's diagnosis.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (socialism with a human face)
HM continues to rock. Actually, today was better than yesterday because 1) more friends were there and 2) better able to pace myself in terms of caffeination levels.

Panels I attended:

Neoliberalism, Inequality, and Dispossession in the Americas. Unfortunately, the Haiti paper was withdrawn, but the two other presentations, one on oligarchic rule in El Salvador, the other on violence in rural Mexico, were quite good. The two presenters also had an interesting dialogue going on between the situations in their respective countries, which was quite interesting.

Forms of Alienation. Back to theory. The standout for me was Sean Sayers on how the popular understanding of alienation is actually quite different than what Marx was actually talking about.

The Body and Capitalist Culture. This was another one I ended up going to randomly because of one of the presenters (in this case, a friend of a friend) rather than the subject matter, and was probably the most interesting panel thus far. The presenter in question was Susanna Quail on the fat body, with a neat framework about systemic versus individualist narratives about obesity on both the left and the right (and how they're both wrong). Alan Sears was also quite fascinating in a presentation on bodybuilding, masculinity, and neoliberalism.

Communicative Commons. A case of a subject I was really interested in (probably the only panel that's close to my "field," so to speak) but not very engaging speakers. I did get some good starting points for further reading, though.

Apparently the highlight for some other folks was the Comintern panel where the Spartacist League turned up and lulz ensued. No fisticuffs were exchanged but I was told it was quite entertaining nevertheless.

Skipped out on the plenary—again—and went to see Cabin in the Woods with [livejournal.com profile] culpster, [livejournal.com profile] monster_grrrl, and L. Completely rocked. I won't say why, or what the one thing I'd change about it was, in case you haven't seen it yet.

Once again failed to take a picture of the dripping cock sculptures. Tomorrow. Remind me, okay?
sabotabby: (lolmarx)
Today was my first exciting day of intense Marxist theory, because I'm the kind of person who wants to spend an entire sunny May weekend at York University listening to academics. And it was so worth it! Delicious ideas, get in my brain.

Panels I went to:

Soviet Activity Theory: From L.S. Vygotsky to E.V. Ilyenkov. Why oh why have this at 9:30 in the morning when no one's awake? I knew one of the presenters and it turned out to be very interesting, despite me having zero background in the subject.

Marxism and Feminism: Revisiting and Extending the Dialogue. Much more accessible. I particularly liked Adrienne Roberts' discussion of the corporate appropriation of feminism as seen in "pink power" and microfinance.

Class and Literature. Also really good. The highlight, naturally, was Cristina D'Amico on charity in Brecht's plays.

Allan Sekula and Critical Realism in the Visual Arts. This was another one where I didn't know anything about the subject. Well, I know about critical realism in the visual arts, but I'd never seen Sekula's work before. It's hardcore.

Nice to be back on York campus too, now that I don't actually need to be there. York is a dreary wasteland in the winter, but quite nice in the spring, with everything in bloom and the gigantic dick fountains drizzling. (I attempted to take a picture of the dick fountains but it didn't come out. Tomorrow I shall try again.) The small presses were out in full force, tempting me with lovely books. I bought two (one on women revolutionaries in Nepal, the other is a surprise for someone) and decided to bring more money tomorrow.

I skipped out on the plenary and reception because I'm exhausted and need to pace myself over the next two days as well. There is such a thing as too much academic conference and I know my limits.

Nerrrrrrd

Jan. 19th, 2012 08:32 pm
sabotabby: (lolmarx)
Spend my birthday weekend at the Historical Materialism conference at York University?

I think that is how I want to spend my birthday. Yes. I think this is a plan.
sabotabby: (lolmarx)
I can't go to this, as usual (though at least I'm apparently not missing China Miéville this time) but isn't the header the most wonderful thing you've seen in awhile? And they say Marxists don't have a sense of humour.

(The font is utter shit, though.)
sabotabby: (lolmarx)
I can't go to this, as usual (though at least I'm apparently not missing China Miéville this time) but isn't the header the most wonderful thing you've seen in awhile? And they say Marxists don't have a sense of humour.

(The font is utter shit, though.)

LOLMARX

Aug. 30th, 2008 12:14 pm
sabotabby: (lolmarx)
Post something funny to justify the use of LOLMarx.

LOLMARX

Aug. 30th, 2008 12:14 pm
sabotabby: (lolmarx)
Post something funny to justify the use of LOLMarx.

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 23 45
678 910 1112
131415 1617 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 11:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags