sabotabby: two lisa frank style kittens with a zizek quote (trash can of ideology)
I promise I would not link you to an hour-long BreadTube video that is mainly a guy talking unless it was really, really good. But like, I also can't be the only person in my friend group to watch this really fascinating video that links Enzo Traverso and Mark Fisher to Ruth Levitas and Ernst Bloch by way of Jackson Galaxy. The cat guy, I mean. This is a rambling tour through the contemporary left, depression and despair, nostalgia and utopianism, and it absolutely made my day. Also at some point in the video an orange cat gets buttered but it's not what you think.

Also he does it under a poster with this incredible graphic, while wearing a Weakerthans shirt, so basically even the subtle details cleared my skin and watered my crops. So, you're welcome.


sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (commiebot)
Leigh Phillips joins authors Gwyneth Jones, Marge Piercy, Ken MacLeod and Kim Stanley Robinson to discuss the role of science fiction in extending the radical horizons of our imaginations.

I don't agree with everything in this article, especially in regards to Zizek (Ken MacLeod, you know that's not what he meant) but it's a pretty fascinating read on the radical potential of science fiction and a good starting point for discussion. I particularly liked the last question, about technology and its place in cultural narratives. All of the authors really hit the nail on the head in terms of describing exactly why I feel uncomfortable with the emphasis on anti-GMO/anti-Monsanto/pro-woo stuff on the left:

Gwyneth Jones: Progressives have a right to be cynical about nanotechnology, likewise GM foods and crops, as long as these developments are controlled by ruthless corporate interests. It isn’t about the science; it’s about the tragedy of the commons.




On a more mundane (but still futuristic!) note, this article on organizing workers in a service economy (from Macleans, no less!) is also an interesting read. The premise is that traditionally middle class jobs aren't coming back (likely true) and thus minimum wage service sector jobs should be transformed so that one can actually earn a living at them.

Proponents of the idea that service jobs can become the new ticket to the middle class point to sweeping changes in the manufacturing sector in the early 20th century that helped transform factory work from dangerous low-pay jobs into secure careers that could support a family. From 1914, when Henry Ford declared he would pay his employees what was then an exorbitant sum of $5 a day in order to reduce turnover and boost demand for his cars, governments saw higher wages and greater workplace regulation as the start of a virtuous economic cycle. But whether the service industry can follow the same model is far from certain.


Read and discuss.
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (this too shall pass)
For some reason, I've got libertarianism on the brain today. I blame The Daily Show for interviewing that one Republican senator who believed in cutting all government spending except for the military. And Eye Weekly's surprisingly good editorial that suggested, among other things, renaming Councillor Doug Holyday's Ward 3 Always Ultra Maxi Pads with Flexi-Wings for Heavy Flow Days Centre. (I'm for renaming Holyday himself that, come of think of it.)

Anyway, [livejournal.com profile] nostalgia_lj pointed out awhile back that the basic difference between a libertarian and a socialist is that the libertarian refuses to see himself as anything other than part of the 0.01% of brilliant, healthy, wonderful people who will be amazingly successful, whereas the socialist can easily picture herself as part of the unlucky majority. (Actually, she phrased it better. That post never gets old, seriously.)

So I was thinking of how a libertarian/Objectivist utopia could actually work. I anticipate a certain level of government fascism needed to, say, preserve the institutions of Rush (the band, not the pundit) and bad Objectivist art, as very few people actually like these things and thus they might become extinct in a completely free market. But beyond that? Would it look like Land of the Dead, with businesspeople paying the military to shoot at the rampaging hordes of poor people storming the gates? Would it last only a few decades because food poisoning and unchecked pollution would quickly kill all of us? Would everyone look like a NASCAR driver, forced to wear as many different corporate logos as physically possible?

Amuse me, people. Hit me with your cool sci-fi projections.

Also, does anyone see a similarity in the romantic realism preferred by Objectivists and the mockeries of classic realism preferred by various totalitarian regimes?
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
For some reason, I've got libertarianism on the brain today. I blame The Daily Show for interviewing that one Republican senator who believed in cutting all government spending except for the military. And Eye Weekly's surprisingly good editorial that suggested, among other things, renaming Councillor Doug Holyday's Ward 3 Always Ultra Maxi Pads with Flexi-Wings for Heavy Flow Days Centre. (I'm for renaming Holyday himself that, come of think of it.)

Anyway, [livejournal.com profile] nostalgia_lj pointed out awhile back that the basic difference between a libertarian and a socialist is that the libertarian refuses to see himself as anything other than part of the 0.01% of brilliant, healthy, wonderful people who will be amazingly successful, whereas the socialist can easily picture herself as part of the unlucky majority. (Actually, she phrased it better. That post never gets old, seriously.)

So I was thinking of how a libertarian/Objectivist utopia could actually work. I anticipate a certain level of government fascism needed to, say, preserve the institutions of Rush (the band, not the pundit) and bad Objectivist art, as very few people actually like these things and thus they might become extinct in a completely free market. But beyond that? Would it look like Land of the Dead, with businesspeople paying the military to shoot at the rampaging hordes of poor people storming the gates? Would it last only a few decades because food poisoning and unchecked pollution would quickly kill all of us? Would everyone look like a NASCAR driver, forced to wear as many different corporate logos as physically possible?

Amuse me, people. Hit me with your cool sci-fi projections.

Also, does anyone see a similarity in the romantic realism preferred by Objectivists and the mockeries of classic realism preferred by various totalitarian regimes?

Profile

sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (Default)
sabotabby

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 23 45
678 910 1112
131415 1617 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
27282930   

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 12:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags