Contradictions
Apr. 10th, 2011 11:38 amThings the liberal commentariat tend to be kneejerkingly odd about:
• Police brutality
• School uniforms and discipline
Case in point: This post on BoingBoing. (Disclaimer: BoingBoingers are not uniformly–pardon the expression—progressive, nor is their commentariat that easily lumped together politically. However, I have noticed a trend towards mostly liberal with a large libertarian streak.) The very same group that was frothing at the mouth in opposition to TSA security policies*—and rightly so; it is entirely correct to call groping and pornoscanners "fascist"—appears to be, for the most part, generating increasingly bizarre justifications of authoritarianism in the schools.
I may be biased in this regard, as I went to a non-uniformed school where we weren't savagely beaten, and I somehow managed to emerge from this experience a civilized individual. But I also now teach in a school where the children display far less fashion acumen than we ever did, and they still manage, for the most part, to not riot. There is also a far greater wealth disparity than in the school that I attended, and yet when kids report bullying, the incidents never seem to have anything to do with clothing issues.
Not to single out BoingBoingers, or even liberals or libertarians, on their hypocrisy—socialists are just as bad, if not worse, with stranger justifications for why it is important to beat out any stirrings of individuality amongst today's youth.
Mismatched socks. Honestly. I can think of a million threats to the public education; socks do not even register.
* There is, of course, a strong element of classism and racism at work here. The TSA is staffed largely by underpaid, racialized individuals. School administrators and cops tend to be a whiter, more middle class bunch, and the worst abuses of power are acted out on the bodies of poorer, racialized children. So it's acceptable. Or something.
• Police brutality
• School uniforms and discipline
Case in point: This post on BoingBoing. (Disclaimer: BoingBoingers are not uniformly–pardon the expression—progressive, nor is their commentariat that easily lumped together politically. However, I have noticed a trend towards mostly liberal with a large libertarian streak.) The very same group that was frothing at the mouth in opposition to TSA security policies*—and rightly so; it is entirely correct to call groping and pornoscanners "fascist"—appears to be, for the most part, generating increasingly bizarre justifications of authoritarianism in the schools.
I may be biased in this regard, as I went to a non-uniformed school where we weren't savagely beaten, and I somehow managed to emerge from this experience a civilized individual. But I also now teach in a school where the children display far less fashion acumen than we ever did, and they still manage, for the most part, to not riot. There is also a far greater wealth disparity than in the school that I attended, and yet when kids report bullying, the incidents never seem to have anything to do with clothing issues.
Not to single out BoingBoingers, or even liberals or libertarians, on their hypocrisy—socialists are just as bad, if not worse, with stranger justifications for why it is important to beat out any stirrings of individuality amongst today's youth.
Mismatched socks. Honestly. I can think of a million threats to the public education; socks do not even register.
* There is, of course, a strong element of classism and racism at work here. The TSA is staffed largely by underpaid, racialized individuals. School administrators and cops tend to be a whiter, more middle class bunch, and the worst abuses of power are acted out on the bodies of poorer, racialized children. So it's acceptable. Or something.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:17 pm (UTC)So obviously, you can wear mismatched socks and still turn out perfectly- OH SHIT I FEEL A NEED TO RIOT NOW
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:40 pm (UTC)YEAH THAT WAS ME with my socks
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:25 pm (UTC)As a rich white Anglo lady without children, I have no horse in this race, but I probably have a slight leaning toward letting students and their parents and guardians decide whether a school should do uniforms or not, as opposed to the administration deciding for them.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:45 pm (UTC)It is A Thing in some US cities. Desirable sneakers and leather jackets most particularly, but also desirable hats and sports jerseys.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 09:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:26 pm (UTC)This appeared yesterday ish in the Guardian. It is vaguely interesting because the schools the two interviewees are from are very different. Fortismere is in a very middle class area indeed (where I walk my doggie lots - where I'd send my child to school if I had one and had the choice!), and has no uniform, and the girl is arguing that no uniform be better; the other school is in a very multicultural area with a lot of inner city poverty and quite a lot of violence, although a lot of cultual and student and arty stuff too, and the boy there is arguing for them.
It is arguing that children from wild backgrounds feel comforted by the discipline and sense of belonging a uniform gives them.
I think the latter school would have more in common with the demographic of your school, so it is nice to hear that you feel otherwise unifrom-wise!
I refused full stop to go to a school with a uniform. Ugh, I would have hated it.
A childhood friend of mine who went to a boys' public school was sent home for having hair a centimetre "too long" and told, "don't come back until you've had it cut," so said, "oh, ok," and just didn't. Heh.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:22 am (UTC)I think a lot of people see it as a magic fix for issues brought about by culture clashes and income disparities.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 09:44 am (UTC)There were quite a few fashion-obsessed girls at my school, to be fair - some whose parents were models or owned fashion shops, some whose parents were actors, etc..
My main problem with uniforms apart form them being evil authoritarian things is that it singles children out for getting attacked or whatever outside school. In London I know there are rival schools with gangs of teenagers roaming the streets looking for pupils from other schools to beat up. And drunken or crazy adults looking for young people to pick on. And paedophile types, though they might be rarer.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:07 pm (UTC)Then I transferred to a school with no uniform. It was lovely; the teachers were encouraging and I made friends for the first time.
In conclusion, school uniforms are BULLSHIT.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-13 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 02:30 am (UTC)Also, "wrong" coloured hair scrunchies.
Yyyyyep.
On the flip side, our students notoriously take ridiculous liberties with the uniform (black yoga pants instead of dress pants, slippers, etc.). It boggles my mind, because the most formal part of the uniform are the pants. They have short and long-sleeved golf shorts, and can wear solid black running shoes. THAT'S IT! I went to a school that strictly did dress shirts, ties, amorphous cardigans and blazers. So it lacks effort to wear the existing uniform properly, and they STILL dont wear it properly. LOL
I dont know what that says about our school's ability to enforce jackshit. (Well, besides that we suck at 'enforcing' RELEVANT shit.)